LOL

Phil Geis Dear Dr. and Professor Geis, My rhetoric is only so deep. I find anyone’s rhetoric to be only so deep. I would be honored to have a formal debate with you, allowing for nuances and for the common good.

Your rhetoric is measured as single digit micrometers. I've read many of your unpublished, self conscious BS sheets that serve almost exclusively as your references. Perhaps you might consider that integrity of self citation.

Phil Geis Maybe I want to argue with you more. Would you like to debate me? If so, let’s a pick a willing formal institution with a moderator. I use both logic and empirical evidence. A benefit to you being really direct is my ideas spread faster.

Pay attention, please. This is not a comparison - only one will be elected so only one will act. We shall have but one observation.

You have a bias - so what?

Your 'ideas" are garbage that sits in the landfill of your self citation.

Phil Geis I would be honored to have a formal debate with you, hosted by an institution and a moderator. Where will we debate? When? Who will moderate?

POTUS does not cater to the whim of collective individuals. The POTUS will consider many factors, including personal gain within a group of well defined personalized traits that balance the needs of people that matter financially, economically, and politically at that moment the decisions are made. POTUSs fundamentally support what is "right" for the time. They are machiavellian, which means that you cannot expect anything from them except what they think will work at that moment. Great examples are almost every president that has ever ruled the US. Perfect examples come from them in 4 year periods where they say one thing, and then do others, do some things now, and then change what they say and do later. Every president has done this. So, talking about moral perceptions are different from discussing actually event results. Think of focusing more on what the presidents will try to do or accomplish, rather than trying to equate their actions to "good" or "bad". Look at the objective and subjective matter of their reign, and then propose individual solutions to these actions using ideas. That will get you better results from readers, and cause a deeper discussion. Debating Nice, or not nice is almost irrelavent in this day and age. Focus on improvement and discuss solutions. I hope this helps you.