Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

The process of popularizing the concept of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy?

What is the role of particular social groups in disseminating the concept of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy?

The role of engineers is particularly important for enabling sustainable development, including sustainable pro-ecological development, based on the concept of a new, green economy. Engineers create new technological solutions, new energy technologies, ecological innovations, innovative ecological buildings, develop renewable energy sources in industry and other applications, create automation technologies for waste segregation, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, develop electromobility, carry out investment projects to reclaim a devastated natural environment, etc.

Apart from engineers, the key actors are the state as an economic entity and financial institutions, ie the main actors of external financing of environment-friendly investment projects, thanks to which sustainable sustainable development based on the concept of green economy is enabled and implemented. The role of politicians who set the direction of the necessary systemic changes is also important. Also important is the role of citizens who within the civil and information society are increasingly aware of the threats to the growing risk of climatic cataclysms that are a derivative of the progressive global warming. The role of mass media and new online media is important, including social media portals, thanks to which the level of social awareness for this type of important problems, particularly important in the 21st century, important for humanity, for the whole planet Earth is growing.

In view of the above, the current question is: What is the role of particular social groups in the dissemination of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

Is it possible that man with the help of modern RES energy technology would stop the greenhouse effect on Earth?

Unfortunately, more and more data and research centers scientifically confirms that progressively progressing global warming has become a fact. First and foremost, human activity influences this. The impact of natural factors is significant, however, the progress of civilization, industrial development, greenhouse gas emissions in the past few decades has increased significantly and continues to grow. The biggest problem may be the inability to reverse this process even if all of the industry, energy and transport are now switching to renewable energy sources.

In view of the above, the current question is: Is it possible that man with the help of modern RES energy technology would stop the greenhouse effect on Earth?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

Do current weather anomalies occurring in many places on Earth are a derivative of the globally progressing greenhouse effect?

At the end of 2018, they were recorded in Europe numerous weather anomalies such as snowfall in Spain, floods in Italy, almost summer temperature in some places in Central and Eastern Europe are recorded in Europe. From year to year, more and more warm winters are recorded in many places around the globe. In addition, for several years, higher and higher annual average temperatures have been recorded. More and more areas in Africa are covered by droughts, lack of rainfall and higher heat temperatures. In some coastal locations, off the coast of the oceans, in America, in Southeast Asia, in Polynesia tornadoes appear more and more dramatic. However, in Alaska, Canada, Norway and other countries where there are glaciers in the mountains, there are fewer and fewer glaciers. In the 20th century, a significant part of these glaciers melted. does it mean that the greenhouse effect on Earth is progressing so fast and is it already an irreversible process?

It probably already works globally, the greenhouse effect and weather anomalies in many places in the world are a derivative of this progressive global warming, ie the recorded rise in the average temperature on Earth.

In some places on Earth from year to year, the average temperature is gradually rising, but there are places on the Earth where there was no real winter before, there was no frost and snow, and in recent years such a winter begins to appear. Cold weather recorded in some geographic places on Earth may also be a result of a globally increasing global warming. This is one of the elements of more and more emerging weather anomalies.

Are current weather anomalies in Europe derived from the progressive greenhouse effect on Earth?

Do current weather anomalies occurring in many places on Earth are a derivative of the globally progressing greenhouse effect?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

Should the development of motoring in the 21st century be based on electromobility or on hydrogen-oxygen engines or other clean power technology?

In a few years, strategic classic energy raw materials, ie minerals contained in the Earth's crust, will be exhausted.

Extracting these minerals from deeper layers of the earth's crust may be unprofitable.

In addition, it may be unnecessary in a situation of global warming and the development of renewable, ecologically clean sources of energy.

However, which type of power supply for motor vehicles should be developed so that the economic, social and ecological effects are the most in line with the strategic goals of the balanced economic development of the world?

If it is electromobility it will be necessary to significantly increase the production of electricity.

In connection with the above, I am asking you the following questions:

What kind of future power plants should be created in the future in order to reconcile economic efficiency with environmental protection the most?

What types of renewable electricity should be developed in the future?

Should the development of motoring in the 21st century be based on electromobility or on hydrogen-oxygen engines or other clean power technology?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

Should economics in the 21st century change in a way that would help achieve sustainable economic development?

In the greatest generalization, economics should help reconcile two opposing issues: How to create and deliver through limited markets economic goods, created on the basis of limited resources to meet unlimited human needs. Economics should also help in formulating the answer to the question: what, how and for whom to produce, produce, offer? On the other hand, in the 21st century, the economy should help answer the question: how should domestic and international economies develop in order to achieve sustainable economic development taking into account the issues of ecology, renewable energy sources, increasing the use of secondary raw materials, development of technological innovations, ecological and materials that will enable achieving sustainable development, i.e. such economic development in which the negative effects of this development for the natural environment will be gradually reduced.

This is a very important question in the context of the changing economies of the 21st century, in the context of the current fourth technological revolution, Industry 4.0.

Apparently, we are now living in the era of the fourth technological revolution, known as Industry 4.0.

The previous three technological revolutions:

1. The industrial revolution of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, determined mainly by the industrial application of the invention of a steam engine.

2. Electricity era of the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century.

3. The IT revolution of the second half of the twentieth century determined by computerization, the widespread use of the Internet and the beginning of the development of robotization.

The current fourth technological revelation, known as Industry 4.0, is motivated by the development of the following factors:

- artificial intelligence,

- cloud computing,

- machine learning,

- Big Data database technologies,

- Internet of Things.

On the basis of the development of these IT instruments and technologies, business analytics of companies such as Business Intelligence and the above-mentioned areas have been dynamically developing in recent years.

In view of the above, I turn to you with the following question: In what direction will the current technological revolution, known as Industry 4.0, develop?

Will "ECONOMY" change its character, its functions in the context of changing economies in the 21st century, in the context of the current fourth technological revolution Industry 4.0, in the context of the growing importance of renewable energy, environmental protection, to reduce the Earth's greenhouse effect and increase the scale of sustainable implementation development?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

The issue of a possible change in the role of the economy in terms of striving to create conditions for the implementation of sustainable development is very important in the 21st century. For the development of the concept of sustainable development should take into account economic conditions in the context of climate change, global warming, rising global temperature, the progressing greenhouse effect of the Earth and the associated new climatic disasters is probably the most important topic for discussion, research and for human activity in XXI century.

The topics related to the greenhouse effect on Earth, which are the subject of discussion, are particularly important and scientifically important and in the context of human life.

Will "ECONOMY" help in the 21st century solve these problems and help develop new economic formulas that will generate global sustainable economic development?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

The above discussion inspired me to the following considerations:

Is it time to change the civilization development strategy globally and focus on sustainable socio-economic development?

Will "ECONOMY" help in this, will "NEW ECONOMY" help in the 21st century?

Yes, it is necessary to change the development strategy based on intensifying the exploitation of the Earth's resources on the sustainable development strategy. It is necessary to develop new energy technologies based on renewable energy sources to slow down the progressing greenhouse effect of the Earth in order to reduce the risk of dramatic natural cataclysms. It is necessary to develop ecological innovations, while it may not be too late. It is necessary to save the Earth from destruction for future generations.

The 21st century is the last moment to introduce global sustainable development based on the development of renewable energy and ecological innovations. Sustainable development should be analyzed and measured in correlation with the analysis of economic growth and the share of individual sectors in the country's economic development, including the transformation of traditional energy sources into renewable energy, environment reclamation and recovery of recyclable materials, and ecological innovations.

I invite you to the discussion

In addition, I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

Is sustainable development possible taking into account the full harmony of economic development with ecology?

Even if it is unrealistic, what are the reasons for building a theoretical model that would present such a fully balanced development?

How to define precise measurable factors for the process of sustainable economic and ecological development in the context of the science of the "new economy"?

It is very difficult to establish precise measures for the sustainable development process. Sustainable economic development in correlation with ecology should be measured to determine if it is being implemented. It is necessary to define precise determinants that on one hand will determine the pace of economic development and on the other hand will take into account specific issues of ecology. It should be a set of quantified indicators based on selected measurable and quantitative data, so that the whole analytical process can be considered as a research objective method. The best solution will therefore be to develop an analytical scoring method, for which the basic components of this method will be defined economic and ecological quantitative indicators.

In view of the above, the current question is: How to define precise measurable factors for the process of sustainable economic and ecological development?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

The question of lobbying the oil industry for national governments to slow down reforms in the energy sector?

The analysis of differences in the scope of Renewable Energy Policy in individual countries should take into account the scale of the share of the oil refining and refining industry in the entire national economy. The large share of the oil industry in the domestic economy may generate analogous large-scale lobbying of the industry on the government, on policies on shaping a specific direction of development of this sector in a given country. This lobbying may concern, for example, the deliberate slowing of energy sector reforms in the scope of pro-ecological needs. This type of conservative policy may not take into account the needs of reforming the energy sector, including the development of renewable energy sources, ecological innovations in renewable energy technologies, ecological material innovations, etc. The development of electromobility or the development of power supply technologies based on hydrogen engines should also be added to this issue. oxygen or other environmentally neutral technologies. Such reforms are necessary in the 21st century in connection with the need to reduce greenhouse gases in order to slow down the progressing global warming process, ie the increase of the average annual temperature on Earth. In the 21st century, it is necessary to develop a new green economy in the context of the forthcoming fourth technological revolution, known as Industry 4.0.

The issues of lobbying the oil industry to slow down energy sector reforms is one of the major problems of modern economics, specifically the issues of sustainable development with the emphasis on ecology, the impact of industry and classic energy sources on the natural environment. This issue is particularly important in the context of climate change, global warming, rising average temperature on the Earth, the progressing greenhouse effect of the Earth and the related new climate disasters is probably the most important topic for discussion, research and human action in the 21st century.

The topics related to the greenhouse effect on Earth, which are the subject of discussion, are particularly important and scientifically important and in the context of human life.

In the context of this issue of lobbying of the oil industry affecting the governments of countries, there is an important issue for discussion in the field of economic development of the world in the 21st century.

Therefore, I am asking you with an important question: Does the issue of oil industry lobbying affecting national governments in order to slow down energy sector reforms be a serious problem and a brake on pro-ecological reforms in the energy sector and the development of, for example, electromobility?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

Will we be able to stop adverse climate changes, global warming, and the greenhouse effect on Earth?

Will we be able to stop or at least significantly slow down adverse climate changes, global warming, the progressing greenhouse effect on Earth and the declining resources of natural biological environments, ecosystems characterized by high biodiversity?

This is probably the most important problem to explore and solve in the 21st century.

Unfortunately, many people, including politicians and entrepreneurs managing large industrial corporations ignore the seriousness of this problem. It is necessary to develop research in this area, in the matter of examining the determinants of climate change, global warming, rising average temperature on the Earth, progressing greenhouse effect on Earth. These problems must be publicized in the mass media. While it is not too late, while this unfavorable process can be partially reversed. Or maybe we can not reverse this process anymore? Maybe it's too late? What then, will we be able to protect, at least partially, the biosphere, natural ecosystems due to these adverse climate changes, anomalies and climatic cataclysms, from drought in many areas currently agricultural or possessing a rich biosphere? Research on these topics needs to be developed, publicized, and published. Perhaps, finally, politicians and owners of industrial corporations will change their approach to more pro-ecological.

This is probably the most important question for the 21st century: Will we be able to stop or at least significantly slow down adverse climate changes, global warming, the progressing greenhouse effect on Earth and the declining resources of natural biological environments, ecosystems characterized by high biodiversity?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

If it is no longer possible to reverse the global warming process, will we at least slow down the adverse climate change, the warming of the Earth's temperature, the progressive greenhouse effect on Earth?

What actions should be taken now to make this possible in the 21st century?

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

How many degrees ° C the will increase the average temperature on the Earth by the end of the 21st century?

Since the beginning of the 20th century, the average temperature on the Earth has increased by 1 ° C

Therefore, the greenhouse effect of the Earth has already begun.

Greenhouse gas emissions have increased in recent decades.

As a result, the global warming process accelerates.

The climate is warming, and therefore more and more climatic cataclysms are emerging.

Droughts and declining areas of agricultural crops are a serious threat.

Will these adverse climate changes be deepened?

In connection with the above, it is particularly important to answer the question: How many degrees ° C the will increase the average temperature on the Earth by the end of the 21st century?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

What next with the global warming of the Earth's climate?

The report of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) shows that greenhouse gas levels on the globe are the highest in 800,000 years. Further emission, which arises according to the authors of the report mainly due to the combustion of fossil fuels, will lead to climate changes, which will be the greater, the more intensive will be the release of gases into the atmosphere. The report is a synthesis of earlier findings of the IPCC.

The conducted prognostic analyzes show that if the industrial development proceeds in the same way as before, i.e. without the implementation of eco-innovations, without reducing greenhouse gas emissions, etc. there is a risk that by 2050 the average temperature on the Earth's surface may increase by another one degrees ° C. It would have been an increase in the average temperature on the surface of the Earth from the end of the first industrial revolution, from the beginning of the 20th century by two degrees ° C. Then the pace of climate change will increase so much that the global warming process can escape any control and then the person will not be able to stop or significantly slow down this process. In such a dark scenario, the average temperature on the surface of the Earth until the end of the twenty-first century may increase by as much as four degrees ° C. Then it will be several times the increase of any negative external effects of climate change on the current state. Slak of emerging climatic cataclysms, including tornadoes, droughts, volcanic eruptions, melting of glaciers in chains of mountain peaks and in the arctic circle region at the Arctic will significantly accelerate. The melting of eternal decay in the Arctic region will release further millions of tons of methane and the greenhouse effect will accelerate even further and in the XXII century an increase in the average temperature on the Earth's surface can achieve a geometric pace. Then it will be a disaster not only for human civilization but also for a large part of life forms on Earth. Pradoxically, man as a rational, intelligent being who, evolutionarily gained an advantage over all other forms of life on Earth and subordinated the whole planet to itself, may lead to self-destruction. Or maybe it is not too late to implement a new eco-friendly economy to at least try to stop greenhouse gas emissions and reverse unfavorable global warming processes? It is therefore necessary to promote and implement the principles of sustainable development within the framework of the new green economy.

Please, answer the following questions:

What next with the global warming of the Earth's climate?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

Chart. Global Warming. CO2 emissions of greenhouse gases, a forecast of the increase in the average temperature on Earth. Source: NOAA, NASA.

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

Do you think international cooperation should increase to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on Earth?

In December 2018, the UN climate summit was held in Katowice in Poland. COP (Conference of the Parties) on climate policy on Earth. UN climate summits, i.e. COP (Conference of the Parties) are global conferences during which climate policy actions are negotiated. Poland twice hosted them - in 2008 in Poznań and in 2013 in Warsaw. In December 2018, the climate summit is held for the first time now in Katowice in Poland.

During this summit, conferences are held, discussions are held on the need to develop a sustainable development policy and the need for development of ecological, renewable energy sources in order to generate a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the future and ultimately reduce the average annual temperature rise on the Earth's surface. From the discussions it follows that it is necessary to develop eco-innovations, new pro-ecological energy sources, development of electromobility of transport means. It is necessary to develop and implement on a large scale renewable energy sources. In addition, it is important to increase the scale of afforestation, as forests and the flora contained in them absorb a large proportion of greenhouse gas emissions.

As part of this year's UN Climate Summit, the 24th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP24), 14th Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP 14) and the Conference of the Paris Agreement signatories (CMA 1) are held. About 20,000 people from 190 countries participate in the event, including politicians, representatives of non-governmental organizations, and scientific and business spheres.

Perhaps during this UN climate summit important and specific agreements, declarations and signed agreements on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions will be taken. The present lectures show that in recent years the warming process of the Earth's climate has accelerated significantly and therefore, in the black scenario of future climate changes, the temperature on the Earth's surface can rise by 4 ° C to the end of the 21st century. If this happened, then the scale of climate-related cataclysms that are dangerous to humans, including droughts, floods, fires and weather anomalies in many places around the world, will increase many times. The problem is very serious globally and therefore a lot depends on whether international cooperation will develop in order to limit these problems and their negative effects.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: Should you think that international cooperation should increase to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on Earth? In addition, another key question arises: how much of this international cooperation is possible, to what extent will real and effective measures be undertaken on the basis of the discussions and declarations undertaken to reduce greenhouse gases?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

Data source: http://cop24.katowice.eu

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

What are the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions on Earth?

The issue of reducing greenhouse gas emissions is currently one of the most important problems for urgent solutions in connection with the accelerating process of global warming.

The fact that the development of human civilization is largely responsible for the emission of greenhouse gases is an irrefutable fact confirmed by numerous independent research centers.

However, in individual countries, the development of industry is at various stages of development.

In individual countries, sources of greenhouse gas emissions can be presented in a different source structure of these emissions.

In some countries, in large agglomerations, the main source of greenhouse gas emissions is transport based on traditional combustion of fossil fuels, combustion of low-quality mineral and non-mineral minerals in domestic furnaces, and energy based on mineral combustion.

Therefore, I am asking you the following questions:

And how is greenhouse gas emissions in your countries or cities?

What are the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions in your country, in the cities where you live?

If you live in cities, is smog a problem?

Is smog the problem in your cities mainly in the winter season or also in other seasons?

Is the greenhouse gas emissions structure in your country significantly different compared to global greenhouse gas emissions data?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Chart. Global Warming. CO2 emissions of greenhouse gases, a forecast of the increase in the average temperature on Earth. Source: NOAA, NASA.

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

What future for several dozen years for the agglomeration in which we live?

In connection with the progressing process of global warming, the importance of creating and implementing eco-innovations, including architectural eco-innovations, is growing.

Currently, projects are being created: City of tommorow, Eco City, Vertical Forest, Sustainable Green City etc.

Will humanity manage to realize these projects?

Will the global warming effect of global warming lead to the disaster of many urban agglomerations?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

What were the projects of architectural eco-innovations created?

Sustainable Green City Project of The Future

Perhaps the development of architectural eco-innovations will in the future be recognized as one of the most important pro-ecological innovations as instruments for reducing negative aspects of the progressing global warming.

In connection with the progressing process of global warming, the importance of creating and implementing eco-innovations, including architectural eco-innovations, is growing.

Currently, projects are being created: City of tommorow, Eco City, Vertical Forest, Sustainable Green City etc.

Therefore, I am asking you with the following query:

Do architectural eco-innovations belong to those areas of pro-ecological innovations that can slow down the progressing process of global warming?

Will architectural eco-innovations save cities from the adverse effects of climate change?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

How to improve the waste segregation system?

At present, new ecological innovations are needed, among others in the field of new technologies for the automation of waste segregation.

The problem of effective waste segregation and management of waste management is particularly important in many developed and developing countries.

The topic is important because it largely concerns the issues of ecology, environmental protection and the possibility of implementation into national economies of sustainable development according to the concept of a new, green economy.

In my opinion, the answer to this question is particularly important in the context of the following issues:

- improving the process of effective waste segregation,

- recovery from waste of secondary raw materials that may be recycled and produce new products on their basis,

- ecologically safe removal and neutralization of harmful, toxic waste,

- environmental protection and reclamation of a devastated environment, eg in garbage dumps, mine waste dumps and industrial waste dumps,

- biological treatment of water, including rivers, lakes and reduction of garbage and waste discharged into the seas and oceans,

- development of renewable energy sources and energy based on safe incineration of waste that will not be subject to secondary recycling,

- production of biocompost from food waste for use in the process of soil fertilization,

- application of technological advances, auto-tinting and robotization of the waste segregation process,

- etc.

I believe that it is necessary to apply appropriate waste management techniques due to the need to develop a new green economy, ie to implement the principles of sustainable development. It is necessary to minimize and limit the negative effects of climate change, generated by the progressive greenhouse effect of the Earth, which is rapidly accelerating global warming.

Improvement of waste management techniques should be implemented through the increase of automation, computerization and robotization in the field of planning and logistics of this process.

In view of the above, I am asking you: How to improve the waste segregation system?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

Do banks in your country cease to finance "dirty" technologies, eg classic energy based on minerals?

During the events currently taking place in December 2018, such as the European Climate Congress and the UN climate summit, the so-called The COP (Conference of the Parties) were in favor of propositions and declarations of changes in commercial banks' credit policies, according to which the lending processes of industrial and energy enterprises being a source of greenhouse gas emissions should be reduced, i.e. first of all traditional energy based on mineral combustion, i.e. hard coal, lignite but also petroleum derivatives.

In addition, in some countries commercial banks have already stopped financing for several years, and also credited the development of services that could prove to be unprofitable in the perspective of the next years due to the global warming.

For example, in some regions of European countries where there are mountains, until recently tourism services have developed dynamically, including ski slopes, banks cease to finance the development of these services because from year to year in these mountains less and less snow falls and artificial snow generates more and more costs.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: Do banks in your country refinance to finance "dirty" technologies, eg classic energy based on minerals?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

Are there any problems in your country related to declining resources of clean water?

In the future, due to the progressive global warming, the surface resources of clean water will be decreasing.

In addition, clean water resources have been decreasing for many years due to the ongoing environmental pollution.

Global warming in many places around the Earth globe will cause weather anomalies, including droughts where up to now there was no such negative weather phenomenon.

Water resources will therefore decrease in these areas.

How are the irrigation systems for arable fields developed in your countries in situations of ever-increasing drought?

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: Are there any problems in your country related to declining resources of clean water?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

Can we still avoid a global climatic catastrophe and what should be done to avoid it?

Humanity has reportedly only had a decade of time for necessary changes in the energy sector to avoid a global climatic catastrophe, i.e. to implement the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development in line with the concept of a new, green economy

Much has to change in consumer awareness, business must change and different social groups should force policies and change legal regulations. It is necessary to develop co-financing of investment projects in the field of renewable energy sources by the state from public funds. In addition, businesses must see this business. The development of renewable energy sources should be profitable, and it is not because it is cheaper to mine minerals, to devastate the natural environment. It is cheap to run classic energy based on mineral combustion because this classic energy and mining industry of hard and brown coal, oil refinery industry, automotive industry of vehicles equipped with internal combustion engines etc. is not burdened with the costs of natural environment devastation, costs of treatment of people who suffer from due to poor air, smog and no negative effects of global warming. If the mining, energy, processing and automotive industries were burdened with these costs, then it would not be worthwhile to devastate and pollute the natural environment. Then it would be more profitable to develop energy and industry based on renewable energy sources. Inventions of electricity have over 100 years of history. 100 years ago, electric cars should be produced, but the oil business this scenario of more sustainable development has crossed out. Therefore, for over 100 years, archaic energy based on the burning of minerals has been developed. During these 100 years, the average temperature of the Earth's surface has increased by 1 degree ° C. From specific scientific studies, it appears that humanity is only 12 years left to make the necessary changes, to switch energy and industry to renewable energy sources and the automotive industry to electromobility, to reduce poor quality of stoves and domestic ovens, on the development of large and small, home solar, wind and other power plants. At the same time, investment projects in renewable energy sources should be widely developed and entire economies should switch to sustainable pro-ecological development according to the concept of a green, new economy. If during this time these changes are not implemented then the average temperature of the Earth until 2030 will increase by another min. 1 degree ° C and then in the following years the greenhouse effect will accelerate and the problem of global warming will become an irreversible process, which will mean the widespread apocalyptic climate disasters covering most of the Earth's surface before the end of the 21st century.

In view of the above, the current question is: Can we still avoid a global climatic catastrophe and what should be done to avoid it?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

The above question inspired me to the following considerations:

Is sustainable ecological pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy necessary to avoid a global climate disaster?

Sustainable proecological economic development based on the concept of a new, green economy regarding entire national economies and future global economies is a necessary future that must be realized in the 21st century if humanity wants to avoid a global climate disaster. Sustainable ecological economic development is based primarily on the creation, development and implementation of large-scale ecological innovations, renewable energy technologies, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, automation and robotization of the process of sorting waste, recovery of recyclable materials, reclamation of a devastated natural environment, afforestation of post-industrial areas, development of electromobility etc. Apparently humanity has only been a decade of time to implement this plan in order to avoid a global climate disaster resulting from the increasingly faster global warming. According to World Wide Fund for Nature (https://cop.wwf.pl/en) humanity is already an endangered species in the 21st century!

In view of the above, the current question is: Is sustainable ecological pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy necessary to avoid a global climate disaster?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

Can the afforestation of civilization-modified areas significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

In many countries, in individual regions and urban agglomerations, tree planting projects are currently underway as part of afforestation programs for civilization-modified areas. In some countries afforestation of civilizational modified areas is considered one of the most important instruments to neutralize the negative effects of greenhouse gas emissions. The main premise of this thesis is the fact that certain species of trees and shrubs absorb significant amounts of CO2 and improve microclimate and water management in surface layers of soil. However, according to the results of scientific research in a situation of high greenhouse gas emissions, afforestation will not solve the problem of global warming. If in a given country, in a given agglomeration the majority of households, motor vehicles and enterprises from the energy sector relies on burning of minerals, the emission of greenhouse gases is so high that afforestation may reduce this emission to a very small extent. In this situation, apart from afforestation, other projects should be developed that will enable the implementation of the principles of sustainable, pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy. These other pro-ecological undertakings include, first of all, the development of renewable energy sources, increasing the efficiency of waste segregation, recovering secondary materials, development of electromobility in the automotive industry, development of programs for implementation, implementation and financing of eco-innovations, such as the construction of small household ecological power plants based eg on installing house roofs photovoltaic panels replacing stoves, in which often poor quality minerals are burned, etc. Therefore, afforestation does not solve the serious problem of global warming but should be developed as one of many instruments to reduce the negative greenhouse gas emission effects.

In addition, it is particularly important to protect existing forest resources, including natural forest ecosystems characterized by high biodiversity, and therefore a high biological value, such as rainforest, tropic rainforest of the Amazon. However, this is only an example of the largest, existing natural forest ecosystem on Earth. All other such ecosystems should be under strict protection and should be excluded from the predatory, devastating forest exploitation economy, i.e. harvesting timber from these natural forest ecosystems, because in the context of the problem of global warming they are one of the most important, most valuable resources of the planet Earth .

In view of the above, the current question is: Can the afforestation of civilization-modified areas significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

Probably the future of humanity in the 21st century depends probably on the next dozen or so years?

Probably the future of humanity depends on the next decade. If, over the next few years, renewable energy sources replacing traditional energy based on the burning of minerals are developed on a massive scale, it might be possible for humankind to avoid a climatic catastrophe in the 21st century. The international climate agreement that currently (December 2018) concluded in Katowice in Poland may be a late and insufficient agreement, because most countries do not intend to develop high-budget projects for the construction and development of power plants based on renewable energy sources. In addition, changes in the automotive industry, changes leading to the development of motorization in the direction of electromobility are too slow. The problem is serious because it concerns the future of all humanity in the perspective of the next two to three generations, yet the necessary changes and reforms in the implementation of economic principles of sustainable pro-ecological development are too slow. With the current pace of changes, there may be a shortage of time to implement the necessary pro-ecological undertakings, and then the problem of global warming will become an irreversible process and will constantly accelerate!

In view of the above, the current question is: Probably the future of humanity in the 21st century depends probably on the next dozen or so years?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

If, over the next few years, renewable energy sources replacing traditional energy based on the burning of minerals are developed on a massive scale, it might be possible for humankind to avoid a climatic catastrophe in the 21st century. Therefore, in each country, various types of renewable energy sources, electromobility in the automotive industry and eco-innovation should be developed in accordance with the level of development, financial possibilities, climate and economic conditions.

I invite you to the discussion.

Economics will have to change towards sustainable pro-ecological development if the global warming process accelerates in the following decades.

The above discussion inspired me to the following considerations:

Can research be considered as the most important factor generating technological value added in knowledge-based economies?

In my opinion, scientific research is the most important source of emerging innovations, new technological solutions and improvements in production processes that contribute to civilization development and technological progress, and also constitute an important source of added value of production processes in the economies of developed countries in knowledge-based economies. In the future, research should play a particularly important role in knowledge-based economies. For example, research should generate innovative ecological and new renewable energy solutions in the future to reduce adverse climate change resulting from a progressive global warming process.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: Can research be considered as the most important factor generating technological value added in knowledge-based economies?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

Is it necessary to improve the waste management technique?

I believe that it is necessary to apply appropriate waste management techniques due to the need to develop a new green economy, ie to implement the principles of sustainable development. It is necessary to minimize and limit the negative effects of climate change, generated by the progressive greenhouse effect of the Earth, which is rapidly accelerating global warming.

Improvement of waste management techniques should be implemented through the increase of automation, computerization and robotization in the field of planning and logistics of this process.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: Is it necessary to improve the waste management technique?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion

The above question inspired me to the following considerations:

What is the role of particular social groups in disseminating the concept of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy?

The role of engineers is particularly important for enabling sustainable development, including sustainable pro-ecological development, based on the concept of a new, green economy. Engineers create new technological solutions, new energy technologies, ecological innovations, innovative ecological buildings, develop renewable energy sources in industry and other applications, create automation technologies for waste segregation, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, develop electromobility, carry out investment projects to reclaim a devastated natural environment, etc. Apart from engineers, the key actors are the state as an economic entity and financial institutions, ie the main actors of external financing of environment-friendly investment projects, thanks to which sustainable sustainable development based on the concept of green economy is enabled and implemented. The role of politicians who set the direction of the necessary systemic changes is also important. Also important is the role of citizens who within the civil and information society are increasingly aware of the threats to the growing risk of climatic cataclysms that are a derivative of the progressive global warming. The role of mass media and new online media is important, including social media portals, thanks to which the level of social awareness for this type of important problems, particularly important in the 21st century, important for humanity, for the whole planet Earth is growing.

In view of the above, the current question is: What is the role of particular social groups in the dissemination of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

The concept of zero growth, green economy, "the post-growth economy", sustainable proecological economic development as an antidote to the future global climate disaster of the end of the 21st century?

Because the issues of "the post-growth economy" and related issues such as the concept of zero growth, green economy, sustainable environmentally friendly economic development combine to form a very complex and multifaceted research area, so I will discuss this issue in the following topics.

The concept of zero growth for the domestic, or rather for, the global economy was based on theoretical considerations aimed at formulating the answer to the question: What would the economy look like in a fully sustainable, pro-annual development based on the assumptions of the green economy?

Development of ecological innovations, implementation on an industrial scale of new technological solutions for renewable energy sources, development of electromobility in the automotive industry, increasing the efficiency and automation of waste segregation and recycling, afforestation of degraded areas of civilization, reclamation of degraded natural environment, etc. in the long-term can not be implemented in In the form of large investment projects financed mainly from public funds, because it would generate a high public debt and the investment projects themselves would be growth-friendly, they would be a denial of "the post-growth economy".

The development of green economics and the long-term pursuit of the global economy for sustainable pro-ecological development must take place through the implementation of economically profitable business projects. How would the whole global economy change so that theoretical considerations could become a fact in the future? There are many answers to this question, and more specifically, recommendations for the necessary changes that must be implemented so that humanity can avoid a global climate disaster at the end of the 21st century.

These recommendations appear, for example, at UN symposia, conferences and summits, during which what should be done to slow down the global warming of the planet Earth is discussed. Some results of research on greenhouse gas emissions and projections of the continuation of the global warming process suggest that only a decade of time has already been left for the implementation and dissemination of these necessary changes, including: developing eco-innovations, implementing new technological solutions on an industrial scale. concerning renewable energy sources, development of electromobility in the automotive industry, increasing the efficiency and automation of waste segregation and recycling, afforestation of degraded areas, civilization, reclamation of degraded natural environment, etc.

Otherwise, the global warming process will accelerate and by the end of the 21st century, the average temperature at the Earth's surface can increase by as much as 4 degrees C, which will mean the melting of all glaciers, sea and ocean surface rise by 20 meters, widespread drought, steppes and desertification many current green areas, significant reduction in arable land area of agricultural production, reduction of areas suitable for human existence, numerous fires, increase of volcanic activity, more frequent climatic disasters such as tornadoes and downpours, release of methane from the arid soils of eternal desiccation of arctic regions and further acceleration of the greenhouse gas emission process and the inability of human to reverse this process.

So now there is time pressure to make the necessary changes for the implementation of the new global economy. We know what to do. We do not know how to do it to make this process based on profitable investment projects and not only on publicly financed investments, which are not always profitable and are financially limited.

Perhaps the solution is the synergy of all these pro-ecological undertakings. The synergy of simultaneous launch of various pro-ecological undertakings will generate an additional added value that will enable the improvement of these activities, including pro-ecological investment projects planned and implemented with the assumptions of the new green economy concept. Only when most of these ventures reach profitability, then only then will the globally functioning green economy based on sustainable pro-ecological economic development become real.

This development would not have to be characterized by high profitability. In the long-term, this profitability would globally approach the zero level in line with the concept of macroeconomic zero growth. Then economics could dominate globally, a global economy based on the concept of "the post-growth economy" would emerge.

If the whole process could be completed in the shortest possible time in the next dozen or so years, humanity could avoid a global climatic catastrophe which, according to the predictions of climatologists investigating the process of global warming, will most likely appear at the end of the 21st century if mankind fails to apply the necessary pro-ecological reforms.

In view of the above, the current question is: The concept of zero growth, green economy, "the post-growth economy", sustainable proecological economic development as an antidote to the future global climate disaster of the end of the 21st century?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

The above question inspired me to the following considerations:

What are the main barriers to the development of renewable energy sources?

What actions should be taken to remove or replace these barriers to the chances of developing renewable energy sources?

Are the main barriers to the development of renewable energy sources the lobbying of enterprises in the energy sector producing electricity and heat based on traditional energy of burning minerals? Is there a lack of financial resources in the majority of countries regarding the financing of high-budget pro-environmental projects from public finance funds? Should there be new, new ecological innovations, new technological solutions in the field of renewable energy sources, electromobility in the automotive field, new generations of batteries, photovoltaic panels, energy storage and transmission stations, hydrogen engines, etc. to produce and use electricity generated on the basis of renewable source of energy has become profitable to become a profitable business? If this process lasts for a long time, there may be a shortage of time to implement the necessary reforms aimed at disseminating in the global economy a model of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of green economy. If this process lasts much longer than by 2030, there may not be enough time to carry out the necessary reforms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and, consequently, the planet's warming process will accelerate considerably, this process will be irreversible and will continue to accelerate and towards the end of the 21st century century will lead to a global climate disaster that threatens the life of all humanity and most other forms of life on Earth.

In view of the above, the current question is: What are the main barriers to the development of renewable energy sources?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In the context of the above considerations, the following question is also current:

Are the biggest global problems of the future underestimated and ignored?

In my opinion, both unfavorable processes, ie the global warming and the depletion of the ozone layer in the atmosphere will increase in the future.

However, there is still some time to implement the necessary pro-ecological reforms to slow down these processes. It is estimated that there has been a decade of time to carry out the necessary pro-ecological investments, thanks to which it would be possible to implement sustainable pro-ecological development in the global economy.

Hedgehogs do not take these actions in the next decade, then these unfavorable climate processes will accelerate in the future and become permanently irreversible. Then, at the end of the twenty-first century, there will be a global climate cataclysm that will threaten the life of all humanity and a large part of other life forms that inhabit the planet Earth.

The problem is therefore serious and underestimated by politicians, entrepreneurs, industrialists and many other social groups. The problem of global warming and decreasing ozone layer in the atmosphere is too little publicized and the educated society is not educated enough.

In view of the above, the current question is: Are the biggest global problems of the future underestimated and ignored?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In addition, I note the interesting discussion inspired me to the following considerations:

The importance of agriculture in modern economies in the context of the progressive global warming of the Earth?

Agriculture is the basic sector of national economies. The technological progress that has been taking place over the millennia, including mechanization and the chemization of agriculture developed since the beginning of the 20th century, through the use of chemical plant protection products, and then genetics have increased yield per hectare. Technical and technological progress in agriculture has also contributed to the gradual decline in employment in agriculture. However, these are not the most serious problems of agriculture. However, many scientific studies and data of climatologists suggest that in the near future, in the 21st century, these will not be the most serious problems of agricultural development. Well, in the 21st century, due to the progressive global warming, crop acreages and areas of arable land can be significantly reduced. In connection with the emission of greenhouse gases in the perspective of the next dozen or so years, the process of global warming may enter the phase of acceleration of this warming and the inability to reverse this process if man in the coming years fails to implement pro-ecological reforms to implement sustainable and pro-ecological development based on national and global economy. the concept of a new, green economy. If this negative scenario was to be realized then by the end of the 21st century at the latest the average temperature at the Earth's surface will increase by as much as another 4 degrees C, which will increase and increase the scale of increasingly emerging climatic cataclysms, all glaciers and arable land areas they will decrease. As part of climate disasters, droughts, desertification and steppping of existing areas covered with greenery will appear. These processes will also reduce arable land areas. There will be problems with the boarding of a large part of the population, the scale of the national migration of people in search of places to live will increase, to survive. More and more permanent economic crises will appear and the risk of dramatic events, including wars, will increase. Humanity can not let this happen. This is the main challenge of humanity for the 21st century. In the near future, ecological innovations, renewable energy sources, streamlining the process of waste segregation and recycling, the electromobility of motorization etc. should be developed. Scientific research shows that these projects should be carried out on a large scale globally already in the perspective of the next decade. Otherwise, the process of global warming will accelerate and become an irreversible process, which in turn would lead to a global climate disaster at the latest at the end of the 21st century.

In view of the above, the current question is: The importance of agriculture in modern economies in the context of the progressive global warming of the Earth?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:

Will ecological innovations be created in the 21st century on the basis of other sciences besides ecology?

In recent years, ecological innovations have also been created on the basis of other non-ecology science. Ecological innovations are mainly created, among others, in the field of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation techniques, recycling, treatment of polluted water, reclamation of a devastated natural environment, energy-efficient construction, electromobility etc. However, more and more eco-innovations, new technological solutions, technical improvements that fit in sustainable pro-ecological economic development also arises in many other fields of science.

In view of the above, are examples of pro-ecological undertakings, technological improvements compatible with sustainable ecological development or ecological innovations that are also created in one of the following or other related fields of science, for example: Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Anthropology Theory, Medicine, Electrical Engineering , Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Business Administration, Risk Management, Big Data, Business Intelligence, Automation & Robotics, Climatology, Agriculture, Biophysics, Biochemistry, Medical Intelligence, Artificial Neural Networks, Ecosystem Analysis, Power Engineering, Construction, Food production, Forest ecology, Biology, Geoscience, Government Programs, Behavioral Sciences, Biodiversity Assessment, Green Architecture, Greenhouse, Waste, Household Products, Information Society, Innovation Management, International Entrepreneurship, Internet Technologies, Knowledge Creation, Bioelectric Energy gy Sources, Business Model Innovation, Cataclysmic Variables, Chromatography, Clean Energy, Cleantech, Climate Prediction, Collaborative Innovation, Commercialization, Computational Intelligence, Computer Science and Engineering, Conservation Biology, Consumer Behavior, Corporate Governance, Creative Economy, Crisis Communication, Cyber ??Security, Data Analysis, Database Administration, Development Cooperation, Digital Ecosystems, Discovery, Earth Sciences, Earthquake Forecasting and Geocataclysm, Econometric Analysis, Economic Integration, Economics of Innovation, Ecosystem Engineering, Electricity, Electronic Systems, Energetic Materials, Energy Technologies, Environment, Environmental Biodegradation, Flora, Food Consumption Life Sciences, Logistics Management, Materials for Sustainable Energy, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Nanomaterials, New Media Technology, Recycling, Physics of Global Warming, Plant Protection, Predictive Analytics, Production Planning, Project Development, Public Eco nomics, Public Policy, Public Policy, Sociobiology, Space Science, Sustainable Agriculture, Sustainable Development Strategies, Technology Forecasting, Transport Economics, Water Resources, Weather Forecasting, Wildlife Conservation, World Economy, ...?

In view of the above, the current question is: Will ecological innovations be created in the 21st century on the basis of other sciences besides ecology?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In the context of the progressive warming of the Earth's climate, the following question is of particular importance:

Is ecological sustainable agriculture a solution for arable farmlands declining in the 21st century?

Is ecological sustainable agriculture developed according to the concept of natural ecosystems, including the genetically-based genetically-scaled species that will be used in a limited, fully controlled environment, help in the 21st century in increasing the productivity of crop production in the situation of declining areas of arable land?

In connection with the warming up of the Earth's climate by the end of the 21st century, a significant part of the arable land will be either flooded by the seas and oceans or will be excluded from the production of crops due to intensifying drought. As part of the civilizational progress, including increasing the productivity of crop production per hectare, it will be necessary to continue research in this field. As part of the pro-ecological development of agriculture based on the assumptions of sustainable pro-ecological development, ie the concept of green economy, chemistry should be gradually reduced to reduce environmental pollution and reduce the impact of chemicals on human health and other life forms. In this way, the adverse impact of civilizational imbalances in natural ecosystems will be limited. In connection with the above, the aim of continuing increasing the production efficiency of agricultural crops per hectare in the future will be intensified by mechanization automation, robotization, improvement of weather forecasting and logistics systems for field works, and improvement of current crop varieties by increasing their resistance to viral and bacterial diseases , fungal, parasitic etc.

An important field of research and scientific discipline, thanks to which it is possible to gradually improve current crop varieties by increasing their resistance to diseases is genetics. In addition, it is necessary to improve irrigation and greenhouse systems due to the progressive global warming and more and more often natural cataclysms. It is also important to improve the techniques of recycling and re-use of waste from intensified agricultural production, so that those wastes that are unsuitable for re-use were as few as possible. It is also important to limit the wastage of produced crops, reduce and develop the recycling of organic waste from the food production process in the agri-food processing sector. As part of the development of sustainable agriculture, it is also important to develop organic farming referring to natural ecosystems. This type of agriculture refers to natural ecosystems in which primary varieties of arable crops function or function. As part of this concept of ecological agriculture, different agricultural crops grow on one agricultural area, which also limits the potential scale of pest feeding and feeding, and ensures a better economy of savings in the use of plant protection products.

Therefore, the use of genetics should be limited only to the successive improvement of current varieties of agricultural produce by increasing their resistance to viral, bacterial, fungal, parasitic diseases, and not to create completely new species of flora and fauna. In this way, through the process of improving, increasing resistance to diseases of agricultural crops, genetics would help to restore or at least significantly increase the natural balance in intensified agriculture. For this process to work it is necessary to develop also the above-mentioned other techniques of environmentally-friendly sustainable development of agriculture. All of the above-mentioned techniques must be applied in a purposefully, precisely planned integrated system of managing sustainable and environmentally friendly agriculture. In this way, the developed agriculture will be adequate to increase the risk of unfavorable effects of the progressive global warming of the Earth's climate and will be one of the most important determinants of the globally developed sustainable economic development of the entire human civilization, ie deliberately oriented development according to the concept of green economy.

In view of the above, the current question is: Is ecological sustainable agriculture developed according to the concept of natural ecosystems, including the genetically-based genetically-scaled species that will be used in a limited, fully controlled environment, help in the 21st century in increasing the productivity of crop production in the situation of declining areas of arable land?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

The above question inspired me to the following considerations:

How to develop environmentally sustainable economic development to slow down the unfavorable warming of the Earth's climate?

What are the most serious problems of civilization development that should be solved as soon as possible? What are the global problems for which research should be developed and solutions to these problems resolved in 2019 and in subsequent years?

One of such research problems, which should not be postponed for an indefinite future, is the need to develop environment-friendly sustainable economic development in order to slow down the adverse process of global warming.

With the warming of the Earth's climate, the risk of more dramatic climate cataclysms, including tsunamis, increases.

Tsunami may be a derivative of the global warming problem. Global warming generates an increase in climate disasters, including more cases of tsunamis.

But not only is the risk of more violent and more dramatic tsunamis rising. Also in recent years, there has been more other types of climate and natural climate catatics, such as droughts, rainstorms, tornadoes and weather anomalies.

At present, it should no longer be asked whether global warming generates an increase in natural disasters only what rate of growth will be recorded in the future? So many data, research centers confirms the progressing process of global warming, that the problem is unquestionable.

More and more data points to the growing risk of climate change, unfavorable for human and life on the Earth, increase of climate disasters, climatic and weather anomalies, which are the result of global warming, rising average annual temperature near the Earth's surface.

Now we should just ask: How can these adverse processes be counteracted? What ecological technologies, renewable energy sources, how to help natural environments, how to rebuild them, such as afforestation, to build natural ecosystems absorbing greenhouse gases?

How to develop ecological business ventures? How to create financing systems for this type of pro-ecological projects? How to dispel international cooperation in this matter? What actions should be taken to move towards the development of a new ecological green economy?

How to develop environmentally sustainable economic development to slow down the unfavorable warming of the Earth's climate?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

In the context of the above considerations, the following question is also current:

Should the classic economy change into a new green economy in the 21st century?

In my opinion, the classic economy should transform into a new, green economy in the 21st century.

In this way, the greatest global civilization problems related to the global warming can be solved or at least the scale of their negative effects will be reduced in this way.

In the light of the above, encouraging discussion, I turn to you with the following question:

What's your opinion on this topic?

Should the classic economy change into a new green economy in the 21st century?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In addition, I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

How can one associate the need to improve the segregation of garbage technology with the problem of global warming?

How can you link the need to improve waste segregation technologies with the problem of global warming and sustainable pro-ecological economic growth based on the concept of green economy?

Improving processes, waste segregation technology is a key problem that should also be studied scientifically.

Research should create technological improvements and ecological innovations to also reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

This is important because the warming of the Earth's climate is already recognized as an irrefutable fact by many scientific centers.

It has also been shown that man is most responsible for this unfavorable warming of the Earth's climate.

In view of the above, I believe that the improvement of waste segregation technology is one of the most important components of the integrated process of sustainable pro-ecological economic growth based on the concept of green economy?

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: How can you link the need to improve waste segregation technologies with the problem of global warming and sustainable pro-ecological economic growth based on the concept of green economy?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

Can genetics help to develop sustainable agriculture with declining arable land?

What is your opinion regarding the production of GMO crops?

What is your attitude towards the newly created cultivars of genetically modified crops?

Please answer

Best wishes

The above question inspired me to the following considerations:

Is ecological sustainable agriculture developed according to the concept of natural ecosystems, including the genetically-based genetically-scaled species that will be used in a limited, fully controlled environment, help in the 21st century in increasing the productivity of crop production in the situation of declining areas of arable land?

In connection with the warming up of the Earth's climate by the end of the 21st century, a significant part of the arable land will be either flooded by the seas and oceans or will be excluded from the production of crops due to intensifying drought. As part of the civilizational progress, including increasing the productivity of crop production per hectare, it will be necessary to continue research in this field. As part of the pro-ecological development of agriculture based on the assumptions of sustainable pro-ecological development, ie the concept of green economy, chemistry should be gradually reduced to reduce environmental pollution and reduce the impact of chemicals on human health and other life forms. In this way, the adverse impact of civilizational imbalances in natural ecosystems will be limited.

In connection with the above, the aim of continuing increasing the production efficiency of agricultural crops per hectare in the future will be intensified by mechanization automation, robotization, improvement of weather forecasting and logistics systems for field works, and improvement of current crop varieties by increasing their resistance to viral and bacterial diseases , fungal, parasitic etc. An important field of research and scientific discipline, thanks to which it is possible to gradually improve current crop varieties by increasing their resistance to diseases is genetics. In addition, it is necessary to improve irrigation and greenhouse systems due to the progressive global warming and more and more often natural cataclysms. It is also important to improve the techniques of recycling and re-use of waste from intensified agricultural production, so that those wastes that are unsuitable for re-use were as few as possible. It is also important to limit the wastage of produced crops, reduce and develop the recycling of organic waste from the food production process in the agri-food processing sector.

As part of the development of sustainable agriculture, it is also important to develop organic farming referring to natural ecosystems. This type of agriculture refers to natural ecosystems in which primary varieties of arable crops function or function. As part of this concept of ecological agriculture, different agricultural crops grow on one agricultural area, which also limits the potential scale of pest feeding and feeding, and ensures a better economy of savings in the use of plant protection products.

Therefore, the use of genetics should be limited only to the successive improvement of current varieties of agricultural produce by increasing their resistance to viral, bacterial, fungal, parasitic diseases, and not to create completely new species of flora and fauna. In this way, through the process of improving, increasing resistance to diseases of agricultural crops, genetics would help to restore or at least significantly increase the natural balance in intensified agriculture. For this process to work it is necessary to develop also the above-mentioned other techniques of environmentally-friendly sustainable development of agriculture.

All of the above-mentioned techniques must be applied in a purposefully, precisely planned integrated system of managing sustainable and environmentally friendly agriculture. In this way, the developed agriculture will be adequate to increase the risk of unfavorable effects of the progressive global warming of the Earth's climate and will be one of the most important determinants of the globally developed sustainable economic development of the entire human civilization, ie deliberately oriented development according to the concept of green economy.

In view of the above, the current question is: Can genetics help to develop sustainable agriculture with declining arable land?

Is ecological sustainable agriculture developed according to the concept of natural ecosystems, including the genetically-based genetically-scaled species that will be used in a limited, fully controlled environment, help in the 21st century in increasing the productivity of crop production in the situation of declining areas of arable land?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

What kind of innovations do you think should be developed for the needs of sustainable pro-ecological development?

In the context of progressing environmental pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, global warming, etc., it is necessary to create and develop new pro-ecological technologies and various types of innovations.

Therefore, I am asking you for the following query:

What kind of innovations do you think should be developed for the needs of sustainable pro-ecological development?

Please answer

Best wishes

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

How can environmental protection and biodiversity be improved by using current ecological technologies?

Due to the current civilization progress in recent decades, acceleration of the development of industry, automotive, urban agglomerations, intensification of agricultural production, etc. and related greenhouse gas emissions, global warming, ozone layer depletion in the atmosphere, increase of environmental pollution, growing problem of smog in urban agglomerations, the increase in pollution of the seas and oceans to which unsorted waste is thrown away is cut out as part of the predatory economy of tropical forests in the Amazon and other largest natural forest ecosystems.

In addition, the secondary effect of global warming of the Earth's climate is the increasing, more frequent weather anomalies, including drought, leading to steppe and desertification of areas that were previously natural forest ecosystems or areas exploited by agriculture.

As a result of the above-mentioned processes, every year many species of flora and fauna disappear forever.

As a result, natural biodiversity diminishes, which for millions of years evolved evolutionally on Earth.

In this way the natural resources of the planet Earth are irretrievably in decline.

In view of the above, the issue of environmental protection and biodiversity is one of the most important challenges of humanity in the 21st century.

Classical economics must change towards a green economy based on the strategy of sustainable pro-ecological development.

Therefore, I am asking you for the following query:

How can environmental protection and biodiversity be improved by using current ecological technologies?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

Should environmental issues be one of the main determinants of globalization in the 21st century?

In my opinion, in the superwar perspective, various aspects of public safety should be developed, including economic, financial, cybernetic security, information security, data transfer, various capital factors in the international perspective, but also environmental security. Internationally operating institutions should be developed, which should improve various systems, including the above-mentioned categories, security systems operating at the international level.

In this way, the world in various aspects could develop more effectively, in a balanced model, in seeking to reduce the scale of many negative societal phenomena, reduce the scale of economic stratification of different social strata, reduce the scale of international income disparities and equipping with production factors. In addition, in connection with the progressive global warming of the Earth, discussions, institutions and activities in the field of environmental protection should also be developed, including reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, improvement of waste segregation techniques, development of renewable energy sources, internationally developed eco-innovations, etc.

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

Should sustainable and pro-ecological economic development be an important determinant of shaping economic policy?

Yes, in my opinion, sustainable pro-ecological economic development should be an important determinant of shaping economic policy.

Do you agree with my opinion?

For many centuries, the economies of countries and enterprises have developed without knowing or ignoring the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development.

On the other hand, in the 21st century the realities have changed, the global warming process is accelerating and if the reforms of pro-ecological changes, development of renewable energy, recycling development, development of environmental protection etc. are not implemented, in the short term the global warming process will become an irreversible process and at the end of the 21st century the planet Earth, humanity and many other forms of life on Earth are threatened by climatic extermination due to the high rise of negative anomalies and climatic cataclysms.

Sustainable pro-ecological economic development, now and in the future, can not be ignored further, it can not be considered a myth. Economics must change towards the concept of green economy. The economic policies of states should also change in such a way as to activate for the development of ecological innovations and support the processes of sustainable pro-ecological development.

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

Which disciplines and industries etc. will develop the model of sustainable ecological economic development in the 21st century?

What disciplines, areas of contemporary economic systems, industries, etc. will in the 21st century develop the model of sustainable pro-ecological economic development according to the concept of green economy?

In connection with the progressing global warming and the increase in the risk and frequency of climate disasters, it is necessary to implement pro-ecological reforms as soon as possible into economic processes. First of all, renewable energy sources should be developed, replacing the classic energy based on the burning of minerals. In addition, it is necessary to improve the technology of automation and robotization in the processes of waste segregation, recycling and re-use of various types of raw materials.

Also, electromobility, ecological agriculture, zero-energy construction, etc. should be developed.

In recent years ecological innovations have been created mainly in the field of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation techniques, recycling, treatment of polluted water, reclamation of a devastated natural environment, energy-efficient construction, electromobility etc. However, more and more eco-innovations, new technological solutions, technical improvements which is part of sustainable ecological development, is also created in many other fields of science.

In view of the above, are examples of pro-ecological undertakings, technological improvements compatible with sustainable ecological development or ecological innovations that are also created in one of the following or other related fields of science, for example: Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Anthropology Theory, Medicine, Electrical Engineering , Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Business Administration, Risk Management, Big Data, Business Intelligence, Automation & Robotics, Climatology, Agriculture, Biophysics, Biochemistry, Medical Intelligence, Artificial Neural Networks, Ecosystem Analysis, Power Engineering, Construction, Food production, Forest ecology, Biology, Geoscience, Government Programs, Behavioral Sciences, Biodiversity Assessment, Green Architecture, Greenhouse, Waste, Household Products, Information Society, Innovation Management, International Entrepreneurship, Internet Technologies, Knowledge Creation, Bioelectric Energy gy Sources, Business Model Innovation, Cataclysmic Variables, Chromatography, Clean Energy, Cleantech, Climate Prediction, Collaborative Innovation, Commercialization, Computational Intelligence, Computer Science and Engineering, Conservation Biology, Consumer Behavior, Corporate Governance, Creative Economy, Crisis Communication, Cyber Security, Data Analysis, Database Administration, Development Cooperation, Digital Ecosystems, Economic Ecoindicators, Ecosystem Ecology, Energy Industry, Ecological Modeling Ecological Economics, Ecological Indicators, Discovery, Earth Sciences, Earthquake Forecasting and Geocataclysm, Econometric Analysis, Economic Integration, Economics of Innovation, Ecosystem Engineering, Electricity, Electronic Systems, Energetic Materials, Energy Technologies, Environment, Environmental Biodegradation, Flora, Food Consumption Life Sciences, Logistics Management, Materials for Sustainable Energy, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Nanomaterials, New Media Technology, Recycling, Physics of Global Warming, Plant Protection, Predicive Analytics, Production Planning, Project Development, Public Economics, Public Policy, Public Policy, Sociobiology, Space Science, Sustainable Agriculture, Sustainable Development Strategies, Technology Forecasting, Transport Economics, Water Resources, Weather Forecasting, Wildlife Conservation, World Economy, ...?

In view of the above, the current question is: What areas of knowledge will be involved in shaping sustainable pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

What types of environment-friendly investment projects can generate an improvement in economic growth?

In which large pro-ecological investment projects many new jobs can be created and in the long-term, new economic added value will be generated, and revenue will be increased and economic growth will be improved?

In what undertakings, types of economic activity should a pro-development sustainable development policy be used to generate additional jobs and improve economic growth for the period of forecasted slowdown in economic growth?

In my opinion, an example of this type of large pro-ecological investment projects is the construction of large power plants producing electricity as part of renewable energy technologies.

What other large pro-environmental investment projects can generate new economic added value, increase in revenues and improvement of economic growth in the long-term perspective?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

Will the development of science improve the living conditions of people in the future?

From the history of science development, many examples of scientific discoveries can be given, which gave humanity significant for the development of civilization and prosperity, various inventions, the effects of scientific discoveries in the form of new materials, technologies, etc. that have found practical application in various areas of production of economic goods that have become in common use by people, they have increased prosperity and made life easier.

However, the answer to this question in the context of the future of the next several dozen or more years, ie in the perspective of the development of science in the 21st century, is already determined by new factors. To these factors should be added global problems and their negative effects such as progressive global warming, increase in greenhouse gas emissions, increased risk of various climatic cataclysms, increased environmental pollution, declining resources of raw materials, arable land and clean water, the need to develop renewable sources of energy, electromobility, recycling, etc., ie the need to develop business processes according to the model of sustainable pro-ecological development, according to the green economy concept.

Whether thanks to the development of science people become happy, it depends mainly on the results of scientific research, scientific discoveries, new concepts created, innovative solutions in specific fields of knowledge regarding their applications in various areas of human life, but also for life on Earth and the natural environment earth. Considering the impact of the development of civilization on the natural environment of the planet Earth, progressive global warming, increasing climatic disasters, also the issues of pro-ecological applications of scientific discoveries are important, because in the 21st century it will be possible to save the planet Earth through a climate catastrophe. If this plan can be achieved in the 21st century, then life on Earth will be saved, and thus people in later generations will be happier.

In connection with the above, I am asking you the following question:

Will the development of science improve the living conditions of people in the future?

Please reply

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

Should commercial banks increase the scale of financing pro-ecological projects?

Commercial banks are interested in financing pro-ecological projects, also referred to as green projects, if they are profitable projects. In many countries, commercial banks provide commercial loans for the implementation of economic projects in the field of green projects if the borrower has creditworthiness.

It is increasingly common for commercial banks to finance economic projects in the field of green projects for marketing purposes and to improve their image in the context of interbank competition.

In addition, a few, operating multinational, globally large investment banks, implementing certain fundamental international policy goals, such as the World Bank, declare that in the coming years they will increase the scale of financial resources allocated for financing pro-ecological projects.

In my opinion, both large investment banks as well as many smaller commercial, deposit and credit banks should increase the scale of financing of pro-ecological projects every year.

This issue is particularly important in connection with the progressive global warming of the Earth. Global warming is recognized by many scientific centers as one of the greatest threats to humanity and life on Earth in the perspective of the end of the 21st century. Therefore, it is necessary to develop environmentally friendly projects, such as the development of renewable energy sources, reduction of classic energy sources based on mineral incineration, improvement of waste segregation techniques, recycling, development of electromobility, sustainable agricultural production, environmental protection, etc., by all possible means.

In connection with the above, I am asking you the following question:

Should commercial banks increase the scale of financing pro-ecological projects?

Please reply

Best wishes

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

Does the development of smart cities improve people's lives?

The development of smart cities is a part of the broader concept of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the use of modern, innovative information technologies and in addition to ecology.

In this way, the development of smart cities also improves people's lives and can make people happier.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

Please reply

Best wishes

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

How can you increase the efficiency of environmental policy?

How can the effectiveness of the environmental policy of the state be increased in order to achieve sustainable ecological development based on the concept of green economy in the shortest possible time?

Please reply

Best wishes

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

Are current weather anomalies the effect of progressive global warming?

At the beginning of 2019 (end of January, beginning of February 2019) in Australia the heat of the centuries has been recorded reaching in some places to almost 50 ° C,

and in the USA, in some places now winter has appeared with frosts reaching around minus 50 degrees C.

In recent years, various weather anomalies have appeared more and more.

The recorded increase in weather anomalies and climatic cataclysms may be a derivative of the progressing greenhouse effect, ie the warming of the Earth's climate. This is also confirmed by the numerous climatic cataclysms and weather anomalies that also occurred in the last year of 2018 appear in numerous places on the Earth. In the autumn of 2018, fires of huge forest areas appeared in some areas of the Earth, such as in Scandinavia, California in the USA, Australia, the Iberian Peninsula, Africa, etc. In addition, weather anomalies, e.g. snow and floods in October and November 2018 occurred in the south of Europe. In addition, numerous tornadoes in 2018 in many places on Earth and so on.

Perhaps these problems will get worse. It is necessary to improve security systems and anti-crisis services, improve the prediction of these anomalies and climatic cataclysms so that people can, have managed to get shelter or cope with an imminent cataclysm. One of the technologies that can help in more precise forecasting of these cataclysms is the processing of large collections of historical and current information on this subject in the cloud computing technology in Big Data database systems.

In view of the above, in connection with the increasingly frequent cataclysms and climatic anomalies, perhaps in the future we will be forced to change our assessment of particular seasons, and for example favorite in some climatic zones, summer will no longer be universally recognized as a positive season, if at this time will often appear increasingly higher temperatures, droughts, fires, tornadoes, etc.

In connection with the above, I would like to ask you:

Are the current weather anomalies the effect of global warming?

Please reply

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

What areas of knowledge will be involved in shaping sustainable pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century?

In recent years ecological innovations have been created mainly in the field of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation techniques, recycling, treatment of polluted water, reclamation of a devastated natural environment, energy-efficient construction, electromobility etc. However, more and more eco-innovations, new technological solutions, technical improvements which is part of sustainable ecological development, is also created in many other fields of science.

In view of the above, are examples of pro-ecological undertakings, technological improvements compatible with sustainable ecological development or ecological innovations that are also created in one of the following or other related fields of science, for example: Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Anthropology Theory, Medicine, Electrical Engineering , Artificial Intelligence, Genetics, Business Administration, Risk Management, Big Data, Business Intelligence, Automation & Robotics, Climatology, Agriculture, Biophysics, Biochemistry, Medical Intelligence, Artificial Neural Networks, Ecosystem Analysis, Power Engineering, Construction, Food production, Forest ecology, Biology, Geoscience, Government Programs, Behavioral Sciences, Biodiversity Assessment, Green Architecture, Greenhouse, Waste, Household Products, Information Society, Innovation Management, International Entrepreneurship, Internet Technologies, Knowledge Creation, Bioelectric Energy gy Sources, Business Model Innovation, Cataclysmic Variables, Chromatography, Clean Energy, Cleantech, Climate Prediction, Collaborative Innovation, Commercialization, Computational Intelligence, Computer Science and Engineering, Conservation Biology, Consumer Behavior, Corporate Governance, Creative Economy, Crisis Communication, Cyber ??Security, Data Analysis, Database Administration, Development Cooperation, Digital Ecosystems, Economic Ecoindicators, Ecosystem Ecology, Energy Industry, Ecological Modeling Ecological Economics, Ecological Indicators, Discovery, Earth Sciences, Earthquake Forecasting and Geocataclysm, Econometric Analysis, Economic Integration, Economics of Innovation, Ecosystem Engineering, Electricity, Electronic Systems, Energetic Materials, Energy Technologies, Environment, Environmental Biodegradation, Flora, Food Consumption Life Sciences, Logistics Management, Materials for Sustainable Energy, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Nanomaterials, New Media Technology, Recycling, Physics of Global Warming, Plant Protection, Predicive Analytics, Production Planning, Project Development, Public Economics, Public Policy, Public Policy, Sociobiology, Space Science, Sustainable Agriculture, Sustainable Development Strategies, Technology Forecasting, Transport Economics, Water Resources, Weather Forecasting, Wildlife Conservation, World Economy, ...?

In view of the above, the current question is: What areas of knowledge will be involved in shaping sustainable pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

What impact will global warming have on the migration of the population?

In connection with the warming of the Earth's climate, progressive global warming, some areas located in the sub-tropical zone in the future will not be fit for existence, and the migration processes of the population will be intensified.

Do you agree with my opinion?

Please reply

Best wishes

The above discussion inspired me to the following considerations:

Can artificial intelligence be used to predict future development of processes?

Can artificial intelligence be used to predict the future development of the studied and observed complex processes such as global warming forecasting or economic development, technological development, civilization development, etc.?

Please reply

Best wishes

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

During the history of life on Earth there were 5 great extinctions of species of fauna and flora. Have you started the 6th species extinction?

In the multi-million year history of life on Earth there have been 5 great extinctions of species of fauna and flora.

In the context of human civilization activity and the rapidly progressing process of global warming, has the 6th species died out?

Please reply

Best wishes

The above question inspired me to the following considerations:

Can artificial photosynthesis inhibit global warming and be a salvation for human civilization in the 21st century?

Apparently it is already possible to produce in laboratory conditions photochemical systems capable of conducting processes of artificial photosynthesis?

Will the construction of photochemical systems capable of conducting processes of artificial photosynthesis reduce in the future the excessive emission of greenhouse gases and protect the Earth, natural ecosystems and humans against the growing cry of accelerating the global warning process and the potential negative effects of increasingly frequent climatic cataclysms?

Will man manage to build photochemical systems capable of conducting artificial photosynthesis processes on an industrial scale to buffer the negative effects of increasing greenhouse gas emissions and inhibit the global warming process?

Please reply

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, the following question is also current:

Are there banks that take into account predicted climate change in the creditworthiness assessment process?

Are there banks that take into account the forecasted climate changes related to the ongoing global warming process in the creditworthiness assessment process?

Are there banks that in lending in the field of granting long-term investment and mortgage loans in the process of assessing the creditworthiness of potential borrowers include forecasted climate changes related to the ongoing global warming process?

For long-term investment loans and mortgages granted for 20, 30 years or more, predicted climate changes related to the ongoing global warming process may already be significant.

Please reply

Best wishes

In addition, I note the interesting discussion inspired me to the following considerations:

How can you slow down the global warming process in the 21st century?

Do you agree with my opinion that in the context of the projected acceleration of the global warming process, humanity in order to avoid a global climate catastrophe should take as a priority in the 21st century a change in the classical economy on the new green economy to develop economies according to the concept of sustainable pro-ecological development, including replacing classic energy sources based on the combustion of minerals for renewable energy sources.

In addition, in economic processes should be implemented as soon as possible and possibly the largest funds programs for reduction of greenhouse gases?

How can you slow down the global warming process in the 21st century?

Please reply

Best wishes

Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:

Which factor determines the most progressive global warming process and how should the economy change?

In my opinion, many factors affect the ongoing global warming process.

Both human civilization activities and natural factors generate continuing unfavorable climate changes and global warming.

In the long-term perspective, it is difficult to predict dozens of years which processes will progress faster because many factors related to the development of human civilization as well as natural and cosmic is important.

However, in my opinion, the greatest impact on the accelerating global warming process is generated by human civilization, and above all obsolete energy technologies based on the burning of minerals.

In connection with the above, it is necessary to develop environmentally friendly technologies for renewable energy sources, electromobility, improvement of waste segregation and recycling techniques, sustainable development of agriculture, industry, urban agglomerations according to the smart city concept, etc.

In the longer term, shaping the regional, national and global economic policies should take into account the change in the philosophy of economic development in such a way as to change the classical economy towards green economy.

Do you agree with my opinion?

Please reply

Best wishes

In the context of the progressive warming of the Earth's climate, the following question is of particular importance:

Is sustainable development possible taking into account the full harmony of economic development with ecology?

Even if it is unrealistic, what are the reasons for building a theoretical model that would present such a fully balanced development?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion

In addition, I note the interesting discussion inspired me to the following considerations:

How to define precise measurable factors for the process of sustainable economic and ecological development?

It is very difficult to establish precise measures for the sustainable development process. Sustainable economic development in correlation with ecology should be measured to determine if it is being implemented. It is necessary to define precise determinants that on one hand will determine the pace of economic development and on the other hand will take into account specific issues of ecology. It should be a set of quantified indicators based on selected measurable and quantitative data, so that the whole analytical process can be considered as a research objective method. The best solution will therefore be to develop an analytical scoring method, for which the basic components of this method will be defined economic and ecological quantitative indicators.

In view of the above, the current question is: How to define precise measurable factors for the process of sustainable economic and ecological development?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:

Is it time to change the civilization development strategy globally and focus on sustainable socio-economic development?

Yes, it is necessary to change the development strategy based on intensifying the exploitation of the Earth's resources on the sustainable development strategy. It is necessary to develop new energy technologies based on renewable energy sources to slow down the progressing greenhouse effect of the Earth in order to reduce the risk of dramatic natural cataclysms. It is necessary to develop ecological innovations, while it may not be too late. It is necessary to save the Earth through destruction for future generations.

The 21st century is the last moment to introduce global sustainable development based on the development of renewable energy and ecological innovations. Sustainable development should be analyzed and measured in correlation with the analysis of economic growth and the share of individual sectors in the country's economic development, including the transformation of traditional energy sources into renewable energy, environment reclamation and recovery of recyclable materials, and ecological innovations.

I invite you to the discussion

The above question inspired me to the following considerations:

Does the activation of innovation and the implementation of new technologies into the industry contribute to the sustainable development of the national economy?

In my opinion, the role of activating innovativeness and implementing new technologies in the industry is important for the effective economic development of the country and supports the sustainable development of the national economy.

In sustainable socio-economic development of the national economy, one of the most important issues is the activation of innovation and entrepreneurship in order to stimulate the development of business entities, especially those companies that based their business model on the implementation of new technologies, innovations, patents, including technical and engineering technology solutions. , production, logistics, IT, process, management, etc.

Therefore, the role of engineers is very large in such organized development of the national economy oriented in economic policy on socio-economic development with particular emphasis on the activation of innovation and supporting the development of companies that their business model rely on new technologies, including engineering technologies.

I invite you to the discussion

I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

Is the greenhouse effect on Earth already objectively recognized by the climate research centers as an irreversible process?

More and more research centers operating in different countries and investigating climate change state that the progressing greenhouse effect on Earth is already a fact. As a result, the risk of increasingly frequent and increasingly dramatic climate disasters is increasing. Man has less and less time to counteract these negative processes.

It is necessary to change the development strategy based on intensifying the exploitation of the Earth's resources on the sustainable development strategy. It is necessary to develop new energy technologies based on renewable energy sources to slow down the progressing greenhouse effect of the Earth in order to reduce the risk of dramatic natural cataclysms. It is necessary to develop ecological innovations, while it may not be too late. It is necessary to save the Earth through destruction for future generations.

In view of the above, I am asking you to answer the following question: Is the greenhouse effect on Earth already objectively recognized by the climate research centers as an irreversible process?

I invite you to the discussion

In addition, I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

How would you design energy if you had unlimited financial resources?

How would you design a similar or different futurological energy and civilization project, containing renewable energy sources of renewable energy and recreation of natural conditions, referring to natural ecosystems, which after years would gain the possibility of self-recreating?

For example, whether with unlimited investment funds or whether it would be possible to achieve a sustainable economic ecosystem from scratch to achieve economic efficiency at least at the zero growth level as follows: Can a large solar power plant be developed in the desert and water obtained from energy to develop agricultural production and plant ecosystems, including forest ecosystems, which, after several dozen years, could almost function themselves?

An important factor would be the possible progressive climate change in a given area and the geographical scope of the area covered by this investment project.

In some science fiction movies there are scenes that suggest that it is possible, economically justified and real. However, the vision presented in science-fiction movies to create real projects can, however, be a very big difference. But many futurological visions that were created in the past have been implemented, so it is justified to undertake such attempts to create further futurological projects.

In connection with the above, I would like to ask you the following question: How would you design energy if you had unlimited financial resources? How would you design a similar or different futurological energy and civilization project, containing renewable energy sources of renewable energy and recreation of natural conditions, referring to natural ecosystems, which after years would gain the possibility of self-recreating?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

Should chemistry and monoculture be reduced in sustainable and ecological agriculture and techniques of natural ecosystems developed?

Should chemistry and monoculture be reduced in sustainable and ecological agriculture and agricultural techniques referring to natural ecosystems should be developed?

Many studies show that the most effective organic farming involves cultivating a formula that refers to natural, complex, biologically multispecies ecosystems.

The formula of ecological agriculture consisting in cultivating many different plant species side by side, referring to the formation of a natural ecosystem, allows to eliminate chemical plant protection products and reduce biological fertilization.

Only the use of biologically neutral machines and technical devices for crops to correct the functioning of organic crops would allow the improvement of this formula and the pursuit of sustainable agriculture.

Only the question of the legitimacy of using or possibly resigning from the creation of new, more resistant to various diseases and pests of new varieties of cultivated plants through the application of genetics engineering would remain to be considered.

It is not about creating new species of plants or animals through genetic manipulation techniques, but about breeding more resistant to diseases and pests new crop varieties as a perfecting cultivation formula referring to the natural ecosystem.

Crops referring to the natural biological biological system should be improved by the creation and introduction into these complex crops of these new varieties of crop plants in order to restore biological balance, which was previously significantly reduced through the widespread use of monoculture crops grown under classical agriculture.

In this way, it is possible to recreate sustainable agriculture in the future in areas where formerly monocultural farming crops or reclamation areas were previously operated.

Therefore, I would like to ask you: Should chemistry and monoculture be reduced in sustainable and ecological agriculture and agricultural techniques referring to natural ecosystems should be developed?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

How to effectively promote the issue of natural ecosystems in the context of developing models of sustainable development in the media?

In order to effectively promote the issue of natural ecosystems in the context of developing models of sustainable development, it is first necessary to develop an information program that will act as the content of specific social campaigns conducted in various types of media, including new media, also on social media portals. Both social information campaigns should be conducted on a large scale. In addition, there should be successive changes to the law, ie new legal regulations that will motivate the transformation of business models towards the development of green economy and sustainable development. These campaigns should also motivate research centers to create new ecological innovations and new technological solutions in the field of renewable energy sources.

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

Is it possible in the future to develop the economy in a sustainable development model modeled on natural ecosystems?

First, natural ecosystems should be fully described and precisely presented in the media, including new online media. Then, natural ecosystems should be actively and widely promoted as models of sustainable development, including models of sustainable economic development on a national and global level.

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

How can you describe, explore and measure the ecological added value resulting from the synergy of pro-ecological activities ...?

In the 21st century, various solutions based on ecological innovations, renewable energy technologies, green economy, clean economy, reclamation of secondary raw materials, etc. should be developed. This way, added value can be generated based on the synergy achieved in parallel, mutually supporting processes. In this way, this kind of ecological added value can help to create a new economy in the future based on more sustainable development.

In view of the above, I am asking you: How can you describe, explore and measure the ecological added value resulting from the synergy of pro-ecological activities ...?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

Should chemistry and monoculture be reduced in sustainable forestry, and technologies that relate to natural ecosystems should be developed?

Many studies show that the most effective organic forestry consists in cultivating forest stands in a formula referring to natural, complex, biologically multispecies ecosystems characterized by high biodiversity.

The ecological forestry formula based on the cultivation of many different species of trees and shrubs adjacent to each other, referring to the formation of a natural ecosystem, allows to eliminate chemical measures to protect forest spruce and shrubs and reduce biological fertilization.

Only the application of biologically neutral machines and technical devices to crops to correct the functioning of organic forest crops would allow the improvement of this formula and striving to achieve sustainable forestry.

Only the question of the legitimacy of using or possibly resigning from the creation of new, more resistant to various diseases and pests, new varieties of cultivated trees and shrubs through the use of genetics engineering would remain to be considered.

It is not about creation of new species of plants or animals through genetic manipulation techniques, but about breeding newer varieties of forest trees and shrubs that are more resistant to diseases and pests as a perfecting formula of cultivation referring to the natural ecosystem.

Cultivation of forest stands referring to the formula of the natural biological ecosystem should be improved by creating and introducing to these complex crops these new varieties of trees and shrubs in order to restore biological balance, which was previously significantly reduced through the widespread use of forest and forestry monoculture carried out under classic forestry.

In this way, it is possible to recreate sustainable forestry in the future in areas where classical monocultural forest crops were previously grown or in reclaimed areas.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: should sustainable chemistry and monoculture be reduced in sustainable forestry, and forestry techniques referring to natural ecosystems should be developed?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

Can the afforestation of civilization-modified areas significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

In many countries, in individual regions and urban agglomerations, tree planting projects are currently underway as part of afforestation programs for civilization-modified areas. In some countries afforestation of civilizational modified areas is considered one of the most important instruments to neutralize the negative effects of greenhouse gas emissions. The main premise of this thesis is the fact that certain species of trees and shrubs absorb significant amounts of CO2 and improve microclimate and water management in surface layers of soil. However, according to the results of scientific research in a situation of high greenhouse gas emissions, afforestation will not solve the problem of global warming. If in a given country, in a given agglomeration the majority of households, motor vehicles and enterprises from the energy sector relies on burning of minerals, the emission of greenhouse gases is so high that afforestation may reduce this emission to a very small extent. In this situation, apart from afforestation, other projects should be developed that will enable the implementation of the principles of sustainable, pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy.

These other pro-ecological undertakings include, first of all, the development of renewable energy sources, increasing the efficiency of waste segregation, recovering secondary materials, development of electromobility in the automotive industry, development of programs for implementation, implementation and financing of eco-innovations, such as the construction of small household ecological power plants based eg on installing house roofs photovoltaic panels replacing stoves, in which often poor quality minerals are burned, etc. Therefore, afforestation does not solve the serious problem of global warming but should be developed as one of many instruments to reduce the negative greenhouse gas emission effects.

In addition, it is particularly important to protect existing forest resources, including natural forest ecosystems characterized by high biodiversity, and therefore a high biological value, such as rainforest, tropic rainforest of the Amazon. However, this is only an example of the largest, existing natural forest ecosystem on Earth. All other such ecosystems should be under strict protection and should be excluded from the predatory, devastating forest exploitation economy, i.e. harvesting timber from these natural forest ecosystems, because in the context of the problem of global warming they are one of the most important, most valuable resources of the planet Earth.

In view of the above, the current question is: Can the afforestation of civilization-modified areas significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

If too few activities are being undertaken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

The visions of the future, in which global sustainable pro-ecological development is dominating, actually looks like a dream.

But it would be nice if it happened. Unfortunately, currently, too little is being done on this issue, primarily in the field of international co-operative.

The international agreement signed today (December 2018) in Katowice in Poland during the UN Climate Summit does not generate much real new ventures.

Most countries have declared that there will be something to do to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but this is not much.

Most countries do not intend to increase expenditures on pro-ecological undertakings, on necessary reforms in enenvironment, on the development of large investment projects in the field of renewable energy sources.

And there is so little time left, supposedly only a decade of time for necessary reforms to avoid climatic armageddon at the end of the 21st century.

In view of the above, the current question is: If too few activities are being undertaken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

Probably the future of humanity in the 21st century depends probably on the next dozen or so years?

Probably the future of humanity depends on the next decade. If, over the next few years, renewable energy sources replacing traditional energy based on the burning of minerals are developed on a massive scale, it might be possible for humankind to avoid a climatic catastrophe in the 21st century.

The international climate agreement that currently (December 2018) concluded in Katowice in Poland may be a late and insufficient agreement, because most countries do not intend to develop high-budget projects for the construction and development of power plants based on renewable energy sources. In addition, changes in the automotive industry, changes leading to the development of motorization in the direction of electromobility are too slow.

The problem is serious because it concerns the future of all humanity in the perspective of the next two to three generations, yet the necessary changes and reforms in the implementation of economic principles of sustainable pro-ecological development are too slow. With the current pace of changes, there may be a shortage of time to implement the necessary pro-ecological undertakings, and then the problem of global warming will become an irreversible process and will constantly accelerate!

In view of the above, the current question is: Probably the future of humanity in the 21st century depends probably on the next dozen or so years?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

If, over the next few years, renewable energy sources replacing traditional energy based on the burning of minerals are developed on a massive scale, it might be possible for humankind to avoid a climatic catastrophe in the 21st century. Therefore, in each country, various types of renewable energy sources, electromobility in the automotive industry and eco-innovation should be developed in accordance with the level of development, financial possibilities, climate and economic conditions.

I invite you to the discussion.

Economics will have to change towards sustainable pro-ecological development if the global warming process accelerates in the following decades.

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

What are the key determinants of the implementation of sustainable pro-ecological development according to the concept of green economy?

- Recycling, renewable energy, electromobility, etc. are some of the most important factors for the implementation of sustainable pro-ecological development?

- Effective segregation of rubbish, recycling, reduction of plastic packaging, etc. are some of the most important factors for the implementation of sustainable pro-ecological development?

In my opinion, such factors as effective waste segregation, recycling, reduction of plastic packaging, development of renewable energy sources, electromobility in motorization, afforestation, architectural ecological innovations, etc. are one of the most important factors to enable real implementation of sustainable pro-ecological development based on a new, green economy.

Effective segregation of rubbish, recycling, reduction of plastic packaging is one of the most important factors for the implementation of sustainable pro-ecological development.

These are the necessary determinants of the real implementation of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of green, new economics.

According to the findings of the last UN Climate Summit held in Katowice in December 2018, it is necessary to gradually withdraw from the production and use of plastic packaging, including plastic cutlery, straws, dishes and replace them with biodegradable, produced from some grains and vegetables.

Recently, the European Parliament voted for legal norms, with which this type of plastic packaging and plastic cutlery, straws and dishes will be withdrawn from 2021. This is one of the important activities in the directions of real implementation of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of green, new economics. In addition, it is necessary to increase the efficiency of recycling and the reduction of toxic waste discharged into the environment.

For example, a cigarette butt discharged into the environment pollutes approx. 1000 liters of water. This is just an example suggesting the necessity to continue taking pro-ecological next steps. On the one hand, the role of the state and the media in the issue of pro-ecological education of the society is important. On the other hand, the industry that generates various types of waste, polluting the natural environment, the industry that produces non-degradable or non-biodegradable and toxic packaging and products that are currently not recyclable should be burdened with the costs of implementing new recycling technologies, reclamation of degraded natural environment and removal of toxic waste from this environment.

Only then will the economic pressure force the creation of new eco-innovations, the production of goods from biodegradable materials or materials that can be safely neutralized or burnt in garbage incinerators.

The electrical energy necessary to supply the aforementioned pro-ecological undertakings should come as far as possible from the development of renewable energy sources. Besides, it is necessary to develop electromobility in the automotive industry, etc. Only the synergy of these various pro-ecological undertakings will generate new categories of added value, which in the future will increase the economic efficiency of these processes.

Only this way will it be possible to implement real sustainable development based on the concept of a green, new economy.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: What are the key determinants of the implementation of sustainable pro-ecological development according to the concept of green economy?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

The process of popularizing the concept of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy?

What is the role of particular social groups in disseminating the concept of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy?

The role of engineers is particularly important for enabling sustainable development, including sustainable pro-ecological development, based on the concept of a new, green economy. Engineers create new technological solutions, new energy technologies, ecological innovations, innovative ecological buildings, develop renewable energy sources in industry and other applications, create automation technologies for waste segregation, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, develop electromobility, carry out investment projects to reclaim a devastated natural environment, etc.

Apart from engineers, the key actors are the state as an economic entity and financial institutions, ie the main actors of external financing of environment-friendly investment projects, thanks to which sustainable sustainable development based on the concept of green economy is enabled and implemented. The role of politicians who set the direction of the necessary systemic changes is also important. Also important is the role of citizens who within the civil and information society are increasingly aware of the threats to the growing risk of climatic cataclysms that are a derivative of the progressive global warming. The role of mass media and new online media is important, including social media portals, thanks to which the level of social awareness for this type of important problems, particularly important in the 21st century, important for humanity, for the whole planet Earth is growing.

In view of the above, the current question is: What is the role of particular social groups in the dissemination of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

What are the main barriers to the development of renewable energy sources?

What actions should be taken to remove or replace these barriers to the chances of developing renewable energy sources?

Are the main barriers to the development of renewable energy sources the lobbying of enterprises in the energy sector producing electricity and heat based on traditional energy of burning minerals? Is there a lack of financial resources in the majority of countries regarding the financing of high-budget pro-environmental projects from public finance funds?

Should there be new, new ecological innovations, new technological solutions in the field of renewable energy sources, electromobility in the automotive field, new generations of batteries, photovoltaic panels, energy storage and transmission stations, hydrogen engines, etc. to produce and use electricity generated on the basis of renewable source of energy has become profitable to become a profitable business?

If this process lasts for a long time, there may be a shortage of time to implement the necessary reforms aimed at disseminating in the global economy a model of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of green economy. If this process lasts much longer than by 2030, there may not be enough time to carry out the necessary reforms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and, consequently, the planet's warming process will accelerate considerably, this process will be irreversible and will continue to accelerate and towards the end of the 21st century century will lead to a global climate disaster that threatens the life of all humanity and most other forms of life on Earth.

In view of the above, the current question is: What are the main barriers to the development of renewable energy sources?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

What are the main directions of the development of electromobility of the automotive industry?

Will the technologies of electric motors and the new generation of batteries installed in cars and other motor vehicles be developed in the scope of the main directions of development of electromobility of the automotive industry? Will the technology of hydrogen engines or other types of engines be developed as part of the development of eco-motorisation? At present, in the majority of countries, there is no financial resources for financing high-budget pro-ecological projects from public finance funds?

Should new, new ecological innovations, new technological solutions in the field of renewable energy sources, new ecoelectrodes producing electricity for the needs of electromobility in the automotive industry, new generations of batteries, photovoltaic panels, energy storage and transmission stations, hydrogen and other engines, etc. be created that the production and use of electricity generated from renewable energy sources becomes profitable, that it becomes a profitable business, that electromobility will become more and more profitable, profitable, and the prices of electric cars drop significantly?

If this process lasts for a long time, there may be a shortage of time to implement the necessary reforms aimed at disseminating in the global economy a model of sustainable pro-ecological development based on the concept of green economy. If this process lasts much longer than by 2030, there may not be enough time to carry out the necessary reforms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and, consequently, the planet's warming process will accelerate considerably, this process will be irreversible and will continue to accelerate and towards the end of the 21st century century will lead to a global climate disaster that threatens the life of all humanity and most other forms of life on Earth.

In view of the above, the current question is: What are the main directions of the development of electromobility of the automotive industry?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

The importance of agriculture in modern economies in the context of the progressive global warming of the Earth?

Agriculture is the basic sector of national economies. The technological progress that has been taking place over the millennia, including mechanization and the chemization of agriculture developed since the beginning of the 20th century, through the use of chemical plant protection products, and then genetics have increased yield per hectare. Technical and technological progress in agriculture has also contributed to the gradual decline in employment in agriculture. However, these are not the most serious problems of agriculture.

However, many scientific studies and data of climatologists suggest that in the near future, in the 21st century, these will not be the most serious problems of agricultural development. Well, in the 21st century, due to the progressive global warming, crop acreages and areas of arable land can be significantly reduced. In connection with the emission of greenhouse gases in the perspective of the next dozen or so years, the process of global warming may enter the phase of acceleration of this warming and the inability to reverse this process if man in the coming years fails to implement pro-ecological reforms to implement sustainable and pro-ecological development based on national and global economy. the concept of a new, green economy.

If this negative scenario was to be realized then by the end of the 21st century at the latest the average temperature at the Earth's surface will increase by as much as another 4 degrees C, which will increase and increase the scale of increasingly emerging climatic cataclysms, all glaciers and arable land areas they will decrease. As part of climate disasters, droughts, desertification and steppping of existing areas covered with greenery will appear. These processes will also reduce arable land areas. There will be problems with the boarding of a large part of the population, the scale of the national migration of people in search of places to live will increase, to survive. More and more permanent economic crises will appear and the risk of dramatic events, including wars, will increase.

Humanity can not let this happen. This is the main challenge of humanity for the 21st century. In the near future, ecological innovations, renewable energy sources, streamlining the process of waste segregation and recycling, the electromobility of motorization etc. should be developed. Scientific research shows that these projects should be carried out on a large scale globally already in the perspective of the next decade. Otherwise, the process of global warming will accelerate and become an irreversible process, which in turn would lead to a global climate disaster at the latest at the end of the 21st century.

In view of the above, the current question is: The importance of agriculture in modern economies in the context of the progressive global warming of the Earth?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

Is ecological sustainable agriculture a solution for arable farmlands declining in the 21st century?

Is ecological sustainable agriculture developed according to the concept of natural ecosystems, including the genetically-based genetically-scaled species that will be used in a limited, fully controlled environment, help in the 21st century in increasing the productivity of crop production in the situation of declining areas of arable land?

In connection with the warming up of the Earth's climate by the end of the 21st century, a significant part of the arable land will be either flooded by the seas and oceans or will be excluded from the production of crops due to intensifying drought. As part of the civilizational progress, including increasing the productivity of crop production per hectare, it will be necessary to continue research in this field. As part of the pro-ecological development of agriculture based on the assumptions of sustainable pro-ecological development, ie the concept of green economy, chemistry should be gradually reduced to reduce environmental pollution and reduce the impact of chemicals on human health and other life forms. In this way, the adverse impact of civilizational imbalances in natural ecosystems will be limited.

In connection with the above, the aim of continuing increasing the production efficiency of agricultural crops per hectare in the future will be intensified by mechanization automation, robotization, improvement of weather forecasting and logistics systems for field works, and improvement of current crop varieties by increasing their resistance to viral and bacterial diseases , fungal, parasitic etc. An important field of research and scientific discipline, thanks to which it is possible to gradually improve current crop varieties by increasing their resistance to diseases is genetics.

In addition, it is necessary to improve irrigation and greenhouse systems due to the progressive global warming and more and more often natural cataclysms. It is also important to improve the techniques of recycling and re-use of waste from intensified agricultural production, so that those wastes that are unsuitable for re-use were as few as possible. It is also important to limit the wastage of produced crops, reduce and develop the recycling of organic waste from the food production process in the agri-food processing sector. As part of the development of sustainable agriculture, it is also important to develop organic farming referring to natural ecosystems. This type of agriculture refers to natural ecosystems in which primary varieties of arable crops function or function.

As part of this concept of ecological agriculture, different agricultural crops grow on one agricultural area, which also limits the potential scale of pest feeding and feeding, and ensures a better economy of savings in the use of plant protection products. Therefore, the use of genetics should be limited only to the successive improvement of current varieties of agricultural produce by increasing their resistance to viral, bacterial, fungal, parasitic diseases, and not to create completely new species of flora and fauna.

In this way, through the process of improving, increasing resistance to diseases of agricultural crops, genetics would help to restore or at least significantly increase the natural balance in intensified agriculture. For this process to work it is necessary to develop also the above-mentioned other techniques of environmentally-friendly sustainable development of agriculture. All of the above-mentioned techniques must be applied in a purposefully, precisely planned integrated system of managing sustainable and environmentally friendly agriculture.

In this way, the developed agriculture will be adequate to increase the risk of unfavorable effects of the progressive global warming of the Earth's climate and will be one of the most important determinants of the globally developed sustainable economic development of the entire human civilization, ie deliberately oriented development according to the concept of green economy.

In view of the above, the current question is: Is ecological sustainable agriculture developed according to the concept of natural ecosystems, including the genetically-based genetically-scaled species that will be used in a limited, fully controlled environment, help in the 21st century in increasing the productivity of crop production in the situation of declining areas of arable land?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

Should the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development through education and mass media be promoted?

Dissemination of the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development of the global economy through education and social campaigns in the mass media

The aim of promoting the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development of the global economy should be to educate the society, including the broadcasting of social campaigns in the mass media.

Perhaps thanks to this, the significance and strength of specific barriers to the principle of sustainable development of the global economy will gradually decrease.

In view of the above, the current question is: Should the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development through education and mass media be promoted?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to scientific cooperation

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

What are the determinants of sustainable pro-ecological industrial development?

Sustainable pro-ecological industry development based on the concept of green economy consists in changing the business model that takes into account the following issues:

- reduction of production maximizing the quantity and activation of qualitative production,

- minimization of negative externalities, including generation of production waste polluting the environment,

- maximizing the recovery of secondary raw materials, development of recycling,

- implementation of saving and purification systems used for the production of water in a closed circuit,

- transition to renewable energy sources as a source of electricity for production processes,

- taxation of production plants, imposition on the production company of the costs necessary to carry out the reclamation of devastated environment as a secondary effect of the production process,

- improvement of employees motivation instruments to invent, design proecological technological improvements of the production process and development of ecological innovations.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: What other determinants of sustainable pro-ecological industrial development can be mentioned in addition to the above?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

What pro-ecological activities can and should be implemented by The World Bank to inspire and effectively act on the issue of the sustainable pro-ecological development of the World?

According to the announcement of the President of the World Bank, from 2020 on, the expenditure on pro-ecological activities will be doubled.

Among other things, The World Bank will allocate USD 100 billion for investments in the public sector and additional USD billion for pro-ecological projects on various topics that are supposed to implement and inspire changes in the new green economy to ultimately reduce greenhouse gas emissions on Earth and to slow down increase in average temperature on the Earth's surface.

However, what specific pro-ecological investments should be implemented in order to achieve the intended results? How should those pro-ecological projects be run and in which topics, eg renewable energy sources, creation and implementation of ecological innovations, technologies and pro-ecological materials, etc.?

What pro-ecological activities can and should be implemented by The World Bank to inspire and effectively act on the issue of the sustainable pro-ecological development of the World?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

How can the quality control system for waste segregation be improved?

Improvement of waste segregation carried out by citizens is an important issue that is an important element of sustainable pro-ecological development.

For some time, specific waste segregation and recycling techniques have been carried out in many developed and developing countries.

However, in many cases it does not work perfectly, and due to the growing problem of growing landfills of unsorted and non-biodegradable waste, these techniques should be improved.

On the other hand, in many cases also the waste segregation quality control system also does not work properly.

In the light of the above, encouraging discussion, I turn to you with the following question: Do you know any methods, tools on how to improve the quality control system for waste segregation, which is the segregation of citizens?

Please answer.

I invite you to the discussion.

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

How to develop environmentally sustainable economic development to slow down the unfavorable warming of the Earth's climate?

What are the most serious problems of civilization development that should be solved as soon as possible? What are the global problems for which research should be developed and solutions to these problems resolved in 2019 and in subsequent years?

One of such research problems, which should not be postponed for an indefinite future, is the need to develop environment-friendly sustainable economic development in order to slow down the adverse process of global warming.

With the warming of the Earth's climate, the risk of more dramatic climate cataclysms, including tsunamis, increases.

Tsunami may be a derivative of the global warming problem. Global warming generates an increase in climate disasters, including more cases of tsunamis.

But not only is the risk of more violent and more dramatic tsunamis rising. Also in recent years, there has been more other types of climate and natural climate catatics, such as droughts, rainstorms, tornadoes and weather anomalies.

At present, it should no longer be asked whether global warming generates an increase in natural disasters only what rate of growth will be recorded in the future? So many data, research centers confirms the progressing process of global warming, that the problem is unquestionable.

More and more data points to the growing risk of climate change, unfavorable for human and life on the Earth, increase of climate disasters, climatic and weather anomalies, which are the result of global warming, rising average annual temperature near the Earth's surface.

Now we should just ask: How can these adverse processes be counteracted? What ecological technologies, renewable energy sources, how to help natural environments, how to rebuild them, such as afforestation, to build natural ecosystems absorbing greenhouse gases?

How to develop ecological business ventures? How to create financing systems for this type of pro-ecological projects? How to dispel international cooperation in this matter? What actions should be taken to move towards the development of a new ecological green economy?

How to develop environmentally sustainable economic development to slow down the unfavorable warming of the Earth's climate?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

What are the applications of data analysis in Big Data technology for the needs of sustainable pro-ecological economic development?

One of the key elements of the revolution in the field of digital information analysis is the analysis of large data sets in Big Data database systems. I describe the applications of data analysis technology in Big Data database systems as well as the possibility of using it for the needs of sustainable pro-ecological economic development in discussions conducted on the Research Gate portal.

In addition, the essence and applications of data analysis technology in Big Data database systems are described in the following publications.

The issues of the use of information contained in Big Data database systems for the purposes of conducting Business Intelligence analyzes are described in the publications:

Article APPLICATION OF DATA BASE SYSTEMS BIG DATA AND BUSINESS INTEL...

Article The Big Data technologies as an important factor of electron...

Article The Technological Solutions Big Data and the Importance of B...

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

In addition, I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

Should humanity strive to achieve full sustainable socio-economic pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century?

I answer this question in the affirmative that YES, humanity should strive to achieve full sustainable socio-economic pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century, because less time has been spent on introducing necessary pro-ecological reforms in industry, energy, material innovations, recycling etc. is one of the most important challenges of humanity in the 21st century.

And what is your opinion on this matter?

Do you agree with me?

Please answer

Best wishes

I believe that this is one of the most important challenges for humanity in the context of the development of human civilization in the 21st century:

Should humanity strive to achieve full sustainable socio-economic pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century?

Some researchers of this problem ask the following question: Is full sustainable socio-economic ecological development in the 21st century possible?

Currently, ecological innovations are being developed in many countries, and renewable energy sources are being developed. For max. decades of traditional energy sources based on minerals will be exhausted. Agricultural arable areas are also likely to shrink. Economics will force an increase in the use of secondary raw materials and reductions in more and more expensive emissions of harmful waste.

So in the new pro-ecological economy synergies of pro-ecological different activities will be realized. This synergy may perhaps generate the necessary added value. this added value may, at least partly, help to realize the beautiful ideas of sustainable socio-economic development. Will this happen now? But everything should be done to make it possible, if it ever was possible.

Even if it were to prove in the future that Sustainable socio-economic development is not possible, in the 21st century it is necessary to try to do everything to make it possible to approach it as closely as possible. However, everything possible should be done to achieve sustainable socio-economic development. In the context of this issue, the following question arises: Whether as part of taking up actions that could develop new sustainable development, or whether bottom-up social movements will inspire politicians to undertake pro-ecological initiatives in the future. At the moment, international conferences are held, during which debates on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and accelerating the processes of generating eco-innovations and implementing renewable energy sources on a larger scale. Perhaps there should be even more such discussions, perhaps the pressure from scientists should be greater for politicians, while it is not too late yet? Unless it is too late? But it probably does not make sense to accept, to think that it is too late, but you have to do what you can in the future, in part, be able to implement sustainable socio-economic development. Will humanity survive until the XXII century in comparable living conditions to those present? It is not known, but everything possible must be done to ensure that these conditions are not significantly worsened in terms of the protection of the natural environment and the progressing greenhouse effect on Earth.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: Should humanity strive to achieve full sustainable socio-economic pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century?

I answer this question in the affirmative that YES, humanity should strive to achieve full sustainable socio-economic pro-ecological economic development in the 21st century, because less time has been spent on introducing necessary pro-ecological reforms in industry, energy, material innovations, recycling etc. is one of the most important challenges of humanity in the 21st century.

And what is your opinion on this matter?

Do you agree with me?

Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes