I have some histological tooth sections marked Mandrillus but they are quite a bit smaller than Madrillus sphinx teeth. Are Mandrillus leucophaeus teeth smaller? I'm having a terrible time finding any data on this.
I haven't been able to find an electronic copy of this paper (the digital subscription at my institution doesn't go back far enough on the particular journal), but it's one that sounds like it might have some useful bits of info for you:
Vitzthum, V.J., 1990. Odontometric variation within and between taxonomic levels of cercopithecidae: Implications for interpetations of fossil samples. Human Evolution 5 (4): 359-374.
Abstract: This study examines metric variation of the post-canine permanent dentition of four monkey groups (savannah and forest baboons, savannah and forest guenons) represented by 1,840 individuals. Papio, Mandrillus, Cercopithecus aethiops, and C. mitis each display marked within-group variation in tooth size. Taxonomic status and/or sexual composition of a sample does not correspond to a particular magnitude of variation. Therefore, the use of the coefficient of variation to assess either the specific or sexual composition of fossil samples is untenable.