Missing data, lake of novelty, bad writing, ........ect
The main reasons as I believe are:
1. Badly presented
2. Scientific faults
3. Plagiarism
4. Poor taken pictures
5. No new thing which helps the science
6. Badly formatting the tables and figures
7. Statistical analysis is not in a proper way
8. May be not in the scope of the journal
the main reasons which makes reviewer reject search may be are:
Lack of Novelty, originality, and presentation of obsolete study
Improper rationale
Unimportant and irrelevant subject matter
Lack of interpretations
Inappropriate or incomplete statistics
Journals’ popularity and the priority given to the manuscript by the editor
Author experience play an important role in presenting his papers, so after few years every young researcher will be expert in his field of knowledge and then be easily able to submit his paper(s) with more than 80% acceptance chance. Hope to all our RG colleagues more and more success in their academic activities in future. Oh I forgot to say that I utterly agree with ALL other RG colleagues impressive comment.
Emad
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Philosophy Of Science
- Reasoning