Is the process of reviewing a research submitted to a conference different from presenting it to a Journal
Hello
It depends on the policy of the publisher. But most of the time, in conferences there is more flexibility because you have enough time to edit your study before publishing. This is my experience, not a generalization.
Liqaa
Dear Azzam Sabah Hameed
Is the process of reviewing a research submitted to a conference different from presenting it to a journal?
Yes, the reason is that a conference duration is very small, so that the reviewers are enforced to give results in a short time which is not the case for a peer reviewed journal. Regards
Thanks dear Dr.Azzam for sharing this question.
I strongly believe that it MUST be the same process including local or international conference or journal. According to my so simple experience in this regard, international such activities are easier than local ones where they always using electronic reviewing. Today 2nd. of November 2017 I have reviewed a paper under covering of the Thomson Reuters, so kindly find the attached posters.
Emad
Yes,
the process of reviewing a research submitted to a conference Is not longues, the the one of the présentation of it to a Journal.
if you présentation is for you very clear, it need to made accent on the possible ??? But in Journal it existe some politico of édition ... the rewievers , etc.
Dear Paul,
No, there is not a slight difference, but principal difference.
The conference papers is more personal view on the expériences and problems...
And in journal paper it need to présent you results,
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Education
- Higher Education
- Conferences