The extremely interesting and topical questions below were about the rift between digital and analog circuits

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Did_the_digital_versus_analog_game_come_to_end?

https://www.researchgate.net/post/With_the_advent_of_Digital_and_Anolog_ICs_is_the_importance_of_Design_of_Analog_Electronic_Circuits_getting_diminished

But the human aspects engendered by this "war" are even more important for us, human beings, living and working in this continously changing environment. This "digitalization" makes a tremendous impact on the electronics, particularly on electronics education. In addition to all the positive sides of this process, there are negative aspects as well...

First of all, this tendency has imposed the domination of the formal approach in technical education. Making circuits digital, miniaturizing and enclosing them in packages, and interacting with them by means of software (e.g., FPGA) has apparently eliminated the need of technical abilities, a natural aptitude to technics (simply, the vocation for mastering something material, e.g., real circuits, with his/her own hands). This gives a chance to students that are averse to technics to enter technical universities at the expense of those having a technical vocation. For example, students graduated mathematical, philological, trading and other non-technical schools can easily enter Technical university of Sofia by solving a few mathematical problems without any proof of their technical aptitudes). In the Computer systems department, where I teach basic, digital and microcomputer circuitry, our students become sooner a kind of "informatics" specialists than real engineers...

Of course, the same sorry truth can be said about teachers and university lecturers. The abstract digital ground gives an excellent opportunity for those of them having no technical sense, abilities and vocation, to work in technical departments where to build "brilliant" courses and to carry out "striking" lections analyzing circuits by applying sophisticated formal methods without understanding circuit phenomena. I have noted the sorry truth that I can talk with my colleagues about anything but only without circuits...

This topic is considered in the interesting materials below kindly given by Prof. Lutz von Wangenheim:

https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id=518bca57d4c118b434000053&key=60b7d518bca574623f

https://www.researchgate.net/go.Deref.html?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.analog.com%2Fen%2Fcontent%2Fcu_rr_its_an_analog_world%2Ffca.html

It is interesting to predict what will be the results of this process...

More Cyril Mechkov's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions