Alternatives to current treatments for bacterial and viral infection

Please discuss your findings and thoughts on this.

In the face of antibiotic and antiviral resistance increasing worldwide are there other approaches than antibiotics to address this approaching crisis such as immunotherapies that enhance immune responses in infected patients? The impact of antibiotics on the world, about eighty years ago, revolutionized the treatment of bacterial infections just as antiviral therapy changed the prognosis of HIV infection.  Despite the World Health Assembly adopting a resolution, in 1998, encouraging member states to address the problem of antimicrobial resistance and to take action.1 Following this, in 2000, the World Health Organization presented a global strategy for the containment of antimicrobial resistance, calling for a multidisciplinary and coordinated approach.2,3 The resources needed to implement the strategy are not available.

Some of alternative strategies against infection include gene therapies that enhance the immune response to infection and bacteriophage antibiotics as antimicrobial defenses. Prokaryotic gene therapy has been suggested to combat multidrug resistant bacterial infection and was in use pre-antibiotic (pre1929).

A pathogen that tends to develop resistance such as Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for about 260000 nosocomial infections in the USA and causes between 60000 and 80000 deaths annually. Resistance to the newer Streptogamins, where resistance is related to the horizontal transmission of SatA (Synercid), has already been documented in streptogammin fed poultry. Apart from the obvious lifestyle choices and dietary requirements for a healthy immune response to pathogens (reduced stress factors, increased antioxidant function). Once infected, could biomedical approaches to boosting innate immune responses an alternative to antibiotics and antiviral drugs, a similar strategy to some cancer gene therapy approaches that consist of protective immune response stimulation.

Antibacterial therapy

Currently, an immunotherapeutic is in the early stages of development and would work by using antibodies, which neutralizes Clostridium difficile. Development of immunotherapeutic is being considered to treat patients with difficult to treat bacterial infections.

Antiviral and antitumor therapy

Immunotherapy has been used to treat cancer for some time and some researchers have reported antiviral effects when using percutaneous, intrahepatic IL-12 gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma [Sangro B et al., 2004]. An adenoviral vector delivered this IL-12 gene and when delivered directly to the site of the tumour there was little evidence of hypersensitivity and autoimmune reactions. Antiviral effects have been reported in patients treated with IL-12 gene therapy for liver tumors. One issue arising from enhanced immune response such as systemic IL-12 and IFN gamma therapy to treat viruses such as HCV can cause drug-induced hypersensitivity.

As our understanding expands about innate and adaptive immune responses and immunotherapy techniques develop, could this knowledge be directed to investigating new approaches to treating some microbial infectious diseases by pooling our knowledge and resources collaboratively?

There is great therapeutic potential in antimicrobial peptides, part of the innate immune system, whose action is confirmed in animal models and indicates that host defense peptides are crucial for both prevention and clearance of infection. However there is an argument that using these peptides may advance microbial resistance to natural innate defenses.

More Annwyne Houldsworth's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions