I have seen values for cell volume from 0.1 pl (erythrocyte) to 1pl (fibroblast in culture) to 5 pl (liver cell) to 10 pl (fibroblast). Mostly water, so density perhaps 1.05. I am sure there is a more useful answer out there, but that may enable you to start calculating.
Thanks a lot for your input. Assuming 1 pl and water, 1 billion cells would weigh about 1 mg, which is quite reasonable. By the way, are these numbers empirical data?
just to add the following values for volume of cells which I found in an old (ultrastructural related) Data Book*) :
- Volume of Plasmocytes (variously sized) in medullary cords of a mediastinal lymph node from a normal, ten week-old rat, after measurements of 443 random cells (SAINTE-MARIE, 1964):
Mean cellular volume (MCV in µm³):
depending on nuclear diameter range (NDR in µm):
NDR: 6.1 - 9.0: MCV 382 µm³
NDR: 5.1 - 6.0: MCV 268 µm³
NDR: 4.1 - 5.0: MCV 258 µm³
NDR: 3.0 - 4.0: MCV 212 µm³
Plasmocytes with cytoplasmic inclusions (measurement of 55 additional plasmocytes containing Russel’s bodies or crystals and which often are binucleated. On a total of 55 cells, 7 have a nuclear range varying between 4.5 and 6.0, and the remaining 48 cells between 3.0 and 4.5 µm.
NDR: 4.5 - 6.0: MCV 623 µm³
NDR: 3.0 - 4.5: MCV 490 µm³
- Volume of B-Cells of rat nucleus supraopticus (ENESTRÖM 1967):
Unoperated: 5814 +/- 507 µm³
Adrenalectomized, 4 days: 3779+/- 338 µm³
7 days: 7830+/- 752 µm³
12 days: 6946+/- 639 µm³
17-25 days, 2% NaCl: 6748+/- 656 µm³
12 days 2% NaCl + 27-33 days 1.5% NaCl: 4157+/- 694 µm³
15 days 2% NaCl + 3-14 days H2O: 4261+/- 911 µm³
References (*) from: DAVID Heinz(Ed) Quantitative Ultrastructural Data of Animal and Human Cells, G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart-New York 1977(ISBN 3-437-30275-2, p. 499, and 520, resp.):
ENESTRÖM S (1967): Nucleus supraopticus.A morphological and experimental study in the rat. Acta pathol. microbiol. scand. suppl. 186, 483-493
SAINTE-MARIE G (1964): Study on plamocytopoiesis. Am. J. Anat. 114,207-233.
Hopefully helpful anyway,
Best regards
Wolfgang MUSS, PhD
SALZBURG, AUSTRIA
PS to Mark CHANNELL: the URL you have posted:
http://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/bionumber.aspx?&id=103725&ver=3 unfortunately – at least for me – is inaccessible (error: “You are about to leave ResearchGateand and we will redirected you to http://bionumbers.hms.harvard.edu/bionumber.aspx?” ) (and therefore must be pasted into the/a web browser) to get the desired result page.
Also there has been a newer BioNumber meanwhile (interesting for me are the huge differences in measurements!)
Thanks to Dr. Krumschnabel, Innsbruck, Austria for your kind recommendation. and, for convenience only to inform about the newest version (=#20) of the HARVARD BioNumbers data base: