The wave-particle duality states that describing light needs the use of the wave model as well as the particle model. This question tries to describe light by using only the wave model.
When I saw the title of your article, I thought it would be a very good article! That doesn't mean it's not a good article. With a little modification, it would be excellent. And you deserve to make that little modification... In that case, you should modify your opinion about gravity.
You've made the point, but the results of the double slit experiment can only be understood by taking into account the (some kind of) wave nature of light.
When I saw the title of your article, I thought it would be a very good article! That doesn't mean it's not a good article. With a little modification, it would be excellent. And you deserve to make that little modification... In that case, you should modify your opinion about gravity.
What is wrong with my gravity model?
You've made the point, but the results of the double slit experiment can only be understood by taking into account the (some kind of) wave nature of light.
Yes, I regard light as waves only, and not as particles, in agreement with the wave model. So, what do you mean?
Gravity is not an effect, but a consequence of the structure of space associated with matter what is behind the ordinary matter...light particles exist, the wave is the medium through which they travel!
Gravity is not an effect, but a consequence of the structure of space associated with matter what is behind the ordinary matter...
Gravity is an emergent force. So, there must be a reason to it, and behind ordinary matter there must be an undetectable matter that is split up in small parts that we cannot detect.
light particles exist, the wave is the medium through which they travel!
It is the other way around: waves can describe the behaviour of an ether based on particle.
Our perceptions are close, I can't accept the difference, but you shouldn't accept it either. You captured this perfectly. I agree with your idea that I managed to give a seemingly objective explanation for the phenomenon of ball lightning. The article is in Hungarian. I don't have time to translate it properly into English.
Preprint A villámok anyaga és a Föld térfázisának hiánya mint kulcsté...
I tend to pay attention to translations, and because of that, they become much better than the original.
You find the essence in an intervening piece of writing.
Research Proposal 'The effect of lightning on the Earth's gravitational field'
I have never seen ball lightning, I have three witnesses... It would be good to interview one of these people in the summer and check one of the qualities described in the article! Which practical area of expertise are you strongest in?
Poster Gravitational Kneading Deformations on Clay to Gravel Mixed ...
This material based on similar ideas of yours. It is true that there is a difference between my own idea and this concept, but consensus is often a good thing!