I recently conducted cDNA synthesis followed by conventional PCR for quality assessment. In the course of this experiment, I observed some unexpected results that have raised questions about the reliability of my cDNA and its potential impact on real-time PCR experiments.

Specifically, here are the key observations:

  • RT- Sample: The reverse transcription negative control (RT-) showed the presence of two bands, with one of them being my target gene. This was unexpected as the RT- control is typically used to confirm the absence of cDNA synthesis. I'm puzzled by the presence of my target in this control (the NTC did not show any bands).
  • Sample Variability: In the PCR results, all of my samples indicated my target gene, but I noticed variations in both stringency and intensity of the bands, despite matching the RNA amounts to 1000 ng during cDNA synthesis (The A260/A280 of all the samples were in the range of 1.8-2). This variability across samples is concerning and may affect the reliability of my results (The A260/A280 of all the samples were in the range of 1.8-2).
  • My primary concern is whether these observations in the cDNA synthesis and conventional PCR could potentially impact the outcomes of my real-time PCR experiments. Real-time PCR requires high precision, and any issues with cDNA quality or PCR variability could affect the accuracy of gene expression quantification.

    I would greatly appreciate insights from the research community regarding the possible reasons for these observations and their potential implications for downstream real-time PCR experiments. Your expertise and suggestions on troubleshooting or optimizing this process would be invaluable.

    More Amirhossein Mohajeri Khorasani's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions