That is whole new paradigm, Tony!! Quite interesting to see like the two types of oscillations with electromagnetic waves that I am developing alongside Emory Taylor with upcoming paper publications on extending Maxwellian electromagnetism and the photon constant of c of light.

Yet another aspect that I am developing alongside my coauthors will be the concept of the weak gravity versus strong gravity, which would explain all the vagaries that four fundamental forces act on - the strong nuclear, the weak nuclear, gravitational, and electromagnetic types. Finally, they can all be unified together under this umbrella eventually!!

Thank you with your innovative paradigm!!

Sincerely,

Rajan Iyer

ENGINEERINGINC INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONAL TEKNET EARTH GLOBAL

About "GR reduces to Newton's theory in the weak field approximation", I think it is a forced merger of two completely different theories of gravity, which is more like GR's wishful thinking. This is a shameless act. Not only copied Newton, but also judged Newton's theory as wrong.

Newton believed that the gravitational speed is very large (But it must be limited), and GR believed that the gravitational speed is equal to the speed of light. So Newtonian gravity can ignore the effect of gravitational delay, but GR must consider the gravitational delay. The speed of gravity is the most fundamental difference between the two theories of gravity.

GR wants to explain gravity by bending space-time, but GR seems to have forgotten that the source of gravity is in motion. Taking the solar system as an example, the sun revolves around the Milky Way at a speed of 240 km/s. If the speed of space-time bending is equal to the speed of light, then the curvature of space-time will gradually increase with the movement of the sun. I think anyone who has studied physics can understand this truth.

From the perspective of 3D, the space-time curvature is the most obvious in the direction of the sun’s speed. This seems reasonable, but have you ever thought about it, velocity is relative, what direction is the real moving direction of the sun? In what direction is the most obvious direction of space-time curvature? Is the velocity relative to the center of the Milky Way 240km/s, or does it need to be superimposed on the velocity of the Milky Way at 600km/s, or does it need to be superimposed on the velocity of the galaxy cluster where the Milky Way is located?

Maybe "relativity" should be called "absolute theory" instead.

Unless the speed of space-time bending is much faster than the speed of light, otherwise, "GR can be reduced to Newton's theory in the weak field approximation" cannot be established! I think this is the biggest bug of GR.

Another example: the diameter of the Milky Way is more than 180,000 light-years. If the speed of space-time bending caused by the Milky Way is equal to the speed of light, then the change in space-time at the edge of the galaxy will lag behind by 90,000 years, that is, the gravitational force from the center of the Milky Way has been delayed for 90,000 years, which will cause the Milky Way to become very unstable. It is conceivable that the Milky Way has disintegrated a long, long time ago.

GR is the biggest mistake in the history of human physical science! Even if mass causes space-time to bend, GR also cannot justify itself, and in fact space-time is very flat. Hope GR ends soon. But I believe that any "geocentric theory" will not easily withdraw from the stage of history, and no one will easily give up their own interests.

The transverse wave requires a surface. For example in you water analogy, the surface is between water and air. Where is your surface?

This is not idle on my part, I think I may have a surface.

John Hodge ,

This is a good question, a fish moving through the water can also cause waves around the fish.

When a car passes by you, I think what you feel is not only the sound of the car horn, but also the wind formed by the air squeezed by the car.

Yeah, yeah.

Where is the surface? I notice in your paper you use ``c'' the surface wave instead of the >>>>c longitudinal wave for Sun's wave Doppler. Seems inconsistent with this question.

John Hodge ,

Maybe the example of water waves stuck your mind.

Imagine that you are a thinking fish in the deep sea, and a shark swims towards you quickly. At this time, you can not only hear the sound of the friction between the shark and the water, but also feel the water waves formed by the shark squeezing the sea water. Perhaps it would be more appropriate to call it water flow.

Well, I hope you can understand. The water flow here is the transverse wave of the gravitational field, and the sound wave here is the longitudinal wave of the gravitational field.

John Hodge ,

One suggestion is not to limit the water waves to the water surface. Water waves can also form in the deep sea. When they reach the surface of the water, you can see the water waves.

No, no. waves in water are longitudinal. I suggest the transverse wave is at a surface - of the shark in you analogy. That is, this limits the speed of the shark. Any wave transmitted at some distance from the shark has to be longitudinal. But very close even say the shark's skin is transverse wave. That is the surface I was thinking of. In my case (the STOE) the hod is a particle that forms the electromagnetic signals and photons and larger particles. Hods have a speed limit of c. The longitudinal waves in the plenum ( a homogenous scalar field) have speed >>>c as van Flandern and de Sangro have measured.

van Flandern is an astrophysicist I respect.

Tony

A velocity of 7 million times c is definitely absurd. Can you not see that. No aberration in gravity is instead caused by the fact that gravity does not move at all, and instead is EMERGING inside matter as an effect of the ether's state of motion.

2 different waves with 2 different speeds are definitely too much: absurd.

From ______________________ John-Erik

Tony Yuan

You didn't mention the other reference wherein the speed of the coulomb force was experimentally found to be >>>>c

Stefanovich, E.V., 2017, Does Pizzella’s experiment violate causality?,J. of Physics: Conf. Series, 845, 012016.

or

Stefanovich, E.V. on RG

Propagation speed of Coulomb force. What do experiments say?

Thanks for you question and insight. It has helped me in my thinking about my model (th STOE).

The issue I had been thinking of recently has been causation, entanglement, and friction. I had been thinking friction was a plenum (a continouus component of the universe that supports wave speeds>>>c and causes gravity) and why hods ( the discrete matter that causes EM signals and photon observationa). Why do hods travel at c? Well, friction? But the plenum must obey the heat equation which has no friction. So, hods and photons are a surface in the plenum and the reaction of the plenum in the heat equation (restricts 1 degree of freddom for the plenum density to flow) causes a ``surface wave'' which slows the hods to speed = c (because hods are light).

Perhaps you could suggest what friction is?

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_friction_on_a_quantum_level_of_particle_interaction_labeled_vacuum_friction?_ec=topicPostOverviewAuthoredQuestions&_sg=8ZLjPuNo2xmV6goh19PfN4Kujwr7ZfLttF8DNu9T6UzxQyZNpRu6fkWnvr1g5AD8TpV108GV_va2VSRW

John Hodge

I have a friend who is a world-class physics professor who studies turbulence. I think you can do some discussions.

NASA has given the orbital precession data of the planets in the solar system, which come from astronomical observations and fitting based on the Einstein-Infeld-Hoffmann equation. (E-I-H equation). It's a really amazing job. So does this mean GR is correct?

If you have studied and used the E-I-H equation, you should know that it does not consider the gravitational delay brought by the slow gravitational speed c, that is to say, the E-I-H equation is based on the premise that the gravitational speed is very huge. The same is true from the description of the E-I-H equation "GR is reduced to Newton's theory under the weak field approximation".

The E-I-H equation has already negated GR's view that the gravitational speed is equal to the light speed c. The E-I-H equation is more like an improvement of Newton's gravitational equation based on Newton's gravitational theory.

GR tells us that the sun bends the space-time, then in what direction does the space-time bend? Is it the direction of the velocity of 240 km/s that the sun revolves around the center of the Milky Way? Or other directions? Have you ever thought that the sun is also moving with the Milky Way at a velocity of 600 km/s?

Have you ever thought that the galaxy cluster where the Milky Way is located is not absolutely static?

Physics is not religion, but physics is science. I very much hope that we can realize the harm that GR brings to human beings. thank you very much.

[[If the gravitational speed is equal to the speed of light c, then we have to consider the effect of gravitational delay. For example, the gravitational force received by planets no longer comes from the current real position of the sun. For example, the diameter of the Milky Way reaches 180,000 light-years, and the gravitational force at the center of the Milky Way takes a long time to reach its edge. Such a large gravitational delay would make the Milky Way very unstable.]]

I have to say that I agree with the above statement very much. Previously I had some misunderstandings on your theory......Although I cannot say I completely agree with the premise of your derivation now, but I do think your theory has its due value, especially the above statement.

https://youtu.be/ab5CemUmAWs

https://youtu.be/jnqo5kqSnRA

LIGO detected electromagnetic wave anomalies and also detected gravitational waves. To be more precise, it detected disturbances in the gravitational field. GW is a transverse wave whose speed is equal to that of an electromagnetic wave.

But the speed of GWs does not represent the speed of gravity. So since the earth can detect GWs from the depths of the universe, we can naturally think of the disturbance of the sun to the surrounding gravitational field. Although it will be much smaller, for planets, because they are very close to the sun, this impact is not possible Ignored.

Also following this idea, I established a gravity model under the influence of GWs and derived the dynamic gravity equation, which is a modification of Newton's gravity equation. I applied this equation to the calculation of the orbits of the planets in the solar system, and the results obtained are basically consistent with the astronomical observation data released by NASA. This is exciting data.

I hope the world takes notice of this discovery, but it does pose a challenge to GR.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab5CemUmAWs&t=100s

Tony Yuan ,

I am near finish of the article:

Research Proposal Physico-metaphysical proof of the existence of graviton (Fiz...

Chapter Physico-metaphysical proof of the existence of graviton

The part about gravity waves... I shared it yesterday, but the concept has existed since before (I do not know precise: 1 week or 2 weeks before the announcement of the LIGO narrative discovery of gravity waves.) and have only just gotten there:

'LIGO detected electromagnetic wave anomalies and also detected gravitational waves. To be more precise, it detected disturbances in the gravitational field. GW is a transverse wave whose speed is equal to that of an electromagnetic wave.'

The narrative of the LIGo is well refuted:

Article A 2017. Fizikai Nobel-díj „gravitációs hullámai”

Here is my concept of GW: needed for graviton (Hungarian):

Chapter Physico-metaphysical proof of the existence of graviton

Regards,

Laszlo

Dear Tony Tony Yuan ,

It is not necessary to talk about things that are intangible no one can verify it.

Here is the gravity wave:

Raw Data Fizikailag-metafizikailag bizonyítani lehet a graviton létezésesét

(only hungarian version)

and graviton:

Chapter 230902-En-H-Gr-t

are related to specific facts

Regards,

Laszlo

Q: I would like to ask you a question: Is the solar gravity on Earth derived from the true position of the sun or from the position we see? According to GR, the gravitational speed is equal to the speed of light, so the solar gravity on Earth comes from the sun 8 minutes ago. Is my understanding correct?

A: But there is a question that always troubles me. If the speed of gravity equals the speed of light, how do the planets in our solar system maintain orbital stability? I added gravity delay based on Newton's gravity equation and found that the orbits of planets become very unstable. However, as I gradually increase the speed of gravity from c to 10c to 100c, the orbits of planets become more and more stable. I don't know how to explain this phenomenon.

Q: But there is a question that always troubles me. If the speed of gravity equals the speed of light, how do the planets in our solar system maintain orbital stability? I added gravity delay based on Newton's gravity equation and found that the orbits of planets become very unstable. However, as I gradually increase the speed of gravity from c to 10c to 100c, the orbits of planets become more and more stable. I don't know how to explain this phenomenon.

A: ...

Dear Tony Tony Yuan ,

If you ask yourself the wrong questions, the answers will be just as wrong. I already said the article was good.Corrected it is even better. There are clear answers to your questions. The new Hungarian version is not up yet, I will put it up only if it is properly proofread linguistically.

Regards,

Laszlo