This is a very specific question. The constitutions of nearly 170 countries recognize a right to dignity. I'm asking for judicial cases that engaged a claim of a violation of the right to dignity as a separate, independent, enforceable right unconnected to other rights.
There are tons of cases that refer to dignity in all sorts of ways, including as a norm or as a complement to other rights, say, a right to privacy, reproduction or voting, for example. But lawsuits that rely and are resolved solely on a right to dignity are a needle in a haystack. So I'm wondering if others know of these unique cases. Thank you!
The right to dignity is a fundamental human rights law principle widely recognized in jurisdictions worldwide. It is rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which affirms that everyone is born with dignity and equal rights. In this context, the right to dignity serves as a basis for the protection of other human rights and can also serve as a basis for legal action in its own right in courts. In many countries, courts have begun to recognize the right to dignity as a basis for assessing human rights violations, allowing individuals to seek legal protection for acts that degrade their dignity. However, despite this growing recognition, the understanding and application of the right to dignity often varies across countries, creating global challenges for law enforcement and the consistency of human rights protection. Within the framework of legal theory, the right to dignity can be understood through a progressive legal approach that emphasizes the importance of adapting the law to social change and human values. This theory suggests that courts have a critical role in interpreting and applying human rights principles, including the right to dignity, in their respective social and cultural contexts. For example, some constitutional courts in newly democratic countries have adopted dignity as a constitutional principle underlying all other rights, thus establishing a more inclusive legal framework that is responsive to individuals' needs. However, challenges remain in reaching a consensus on the substance and application of the right to dignity across jurisdictions, often influenced by local and historical factors.
No question that dignity is recognized under international, regional, national and subnational law. For present purposes I'm most interested in this part of the answer above: "In many countries, courts have begun to recognize the right to dignity as a basis for assessing human rights violations, allowing individuals to seek legal protection for acts that degrade their dignity." I'm aware of hundreds of cases in which dignity is invoked to compliment or or in support of other rights. But in which cases does/did a right to dignity serve as a sole, independent stand-alone right recognize and vindicated by a court?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Statistics
- Applied Statistics
- Survey Design
- Questionnaire