It is easier for scientists engaged in nuclear fusion to switch careers to permanent motion, so it is recommended to switch careers.
The three formulas in the figure are the dynamic basis of this perpetual motion machine.
The only difficulty is charge binding: the diffusion process of charges from A to B requires a constrained electric or magnetic field. The difficulty of this constraint is relatively small compared to nuclear fusion, and it is easy for them to switch to making perpetual motion machines. Suggest transitioning to nuclear fusion and engaging in perpetual motion machines.
Although some progress has been made in nuclear fusion, there are still many technical challenges and high costs.
There are various ways to implement perpetual motion machines, not limited to this model.
Interesting the idea you have realized. I am not familiar in this area, so for a better understanding.
the following questions would be asked:
You have the following interesting remark:
'The only difficulty is charge binding: the diffusion process of charges from A to B requires a constrained electric or magnetic field. The difficulty of this constraint is relatively small compared to nuclear fusion, and it is easy for them to switch to making perpetual motion machines. Suggest transitioning to nuclear fusion and engaging in perpetual motion machines.' - In the system, you can achieve this by using the metal bucket.
after the electrical current is switched off, what maintains the permanent magnetic or electric field ? Where will the system get the energy to do this?
Your question actually involves specific technical issues, and scientists engaged in nuclear fusion can easily design an electrostatic magnetic field without energy consumption. I hope they can participate.