Dear academicians and researchers
We recently wrote a narrative review paper on “ChatGPT and Academic Research: A Review and Recommendations Based on Practical Examples”. Our findings were
To read the full paper: https://journals.cspc.edu.ph/index.php/jemds/article/view/175
We have also proposed some recommendations for academic researchers based on our findings.
Recommendations are attached here.
However, what is your own experience regarding this issue?
Md. Mizanur Rahman,
Thank you for providing this information.
Best regards
The underlying theory of LLMs is very crude with respect to the level of complexity to truly write a paper. I see no underlying justification for the general research community to use it (besides using it as the toy it is). While the technology holds promise, it is dangerous to use unless one knows the underlying limitations of the mathematical equations involved.
Oh!! That is a great observation "Arturo Geigel". Thank you for your suggestions as well.
ChatGPT provides interesting information, but it is not possible to verify the sources of the information provided :) (all references are false) However, it is an excellent tool for summarizing text and condensing information. By using ChatGPT, you can reduce the length of your text while keeping the same information. To do this, it is important to ask it to write in a concise style.
Thank you so much, professor Lëonid Volkov. Yes, professor, your observation is correct. Academicians, researchers, and students can use ChatGPT to summarise the article. But, in terms of referencing, and synthesising the information, we need to be very careful.
Thank you Dr. Md. Mizanur for providing us with such research findings.
Have no experience dealing with ChatGPT.
However, I have had a great deal in experience with Artificial Intelligence from an adaptive control utilizing the Kalman Filtering-via math modeling perspective. From this domain perspective, the notions presented in your article are very much inline with the successful understanding of medical homeostasis concepts of "feedforward (unstable) and feedback(stable) control loops.
As such, I found your article contributes to our* QMH(Quantifying Mental Health) WKDB (World Knowledge DataBase) of circumstantial evidence
necessary for design of our ontological forensic simulator.
Respectfully, Al Fermelia
* Stephen Ternyik and AF.
Thank you so much, Professor Al Fermelia, for your constructive reply.
Very interesting work. ChatGPT is now considered a threat in that it is seen as the main tool for plagiarism.
It is in fact no more a threat than commissioned essay writers always were. there are just as many clues, especially with the random and sometimes peculiar errors the system generates to create the suspicion of plagiarism in the firsts instance. From that point on a short interview with he suspected plagiarist usual conforms that are not the author of the work.
If you want create text based on existing databases, then ChatGTP is a wonderful tool. But if it is new data not in databases that can be searched by ChatGTP, it can’t do nothing with it. So, you must have your databases ready.
There are other AI applications such as Rytr, Jasper, Copy.ai, Synthesia and Looka. In the future more applications will be developed.
I have been using artificial intelligence for the past month. The name of the application I use is bearly.ai. I can say that it is successful in summarising articles in the literature, but I had difficulties in summarising a doctoral thesis. I also find it extremely favourable that artificial intelligence gives original research ideas on any subject. Besides its positive features, it also has negative features. One of them is that I can say that there are problems in literature research. It is also possible to say that it cannot analyse dataset. At the same time, the use of artificial intelligence causes confusion about academic plagiarism. But it is certain that it will increase academic performance. Artificial intelligence is far from doing things that a human can do right now. But this may be possible in the near future. Unfortunately, this situation is very scary. Currently, artificial intelligence can be used as a recommendation tool. So that, time is saved.
I tried bing in skype, and it seems to work well with references, since it has access to PUBMED.
Thank you so much, Bedriye Güneş, for your valuable observations.
Regards.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Phytochemistry
- Extracts