I'm interested in doing sum formula annotation to highly resolved metabolites in high-resolution mass spectrometry via the isotopic peaks. A nice summary of how this is done I've found here:

http://www.sepscience.com/Information/Archive/MS-Solutions/254-/MS-Solutions-5-The-Role-of-Isotope-Peak-Intensities-Obtained-Using-Mass-Spectrometry-in-Determining-an-Elemental-Composition-Part-1

In short, the intensity of the first 13C-isotopic peak is the C-number of the monoisotopic mass times 1.1, meaning a compound with 10 12C atoms (at 100%) has a 9 12C and 1 13C peak at a relative intensity of 11%, the so-called X+1-peak. The second isotopic peak, X+2, is calculated by 0.006 × nC2.

Now, I'm having trouble with a certain metabolite with the sum formula C55H57O29 (see attached file). At this oxygen count, I assume the 18O peak already can have an impact at the isotopic peaks. The according isotopic peak can be calculated by 0.20 times nO. I'm unsure of the composition of the second isotopic peak (m/z 1183) of my compound. The first isotopic peak, m/z 1182 has one 13C-Atom and an intensity of 55 x 1.1, which correctly is 60.5, as can be seen. m/z 1183, purely considering 13C, and not 18O, should have an intensity of 55² x 0.06 = 18.15, but I see an intensity of 23.97. However, the annoted sum formula from purely 13C is very good (0.48 ppm). If I consider now that m/z 1183 also contains one 18O-Atom, 0.20 x 29 = 5.8. Because isotopic peak abundances are additive for each element, this would be 18.15 + 5.8 = 23.95, which fits near perfectly for the intensity I actually see (23.97)

However, the annotated sum formula with two 13C and one 18O, C5313C2H57O2818O, has a mass of 1185 m/z, and I actually see this as a very good first sum formula offer at 0.66 ppm. Did I make some mistake in the calculations of m/z 1183, or how can it be that the intensity is 23.97, while it should be 18.15, assuming 18O doesn't factor in already at the second isotopic peak - as the first isotopic peak where it occurs is obviously m/z 1185?

Thanks in advance.

More Hannes Doerfler's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions