- How do individuals and institutions organise their work to advance sustainability across SDGs for societal relevance?
- What are the intellectual dispositions and cognitive strategies that serve Anthropocene thinkers?
- What obstacles do global environmental change confront as attempt to produce exemplary interdisciplinary work?
To answer these questions, we could consider doing much better than the Planetary Boundaries framework due to the critiques, some of which are:
1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.10.004 and response http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.01.010 and reply https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.01.008
2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.004
3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.006
4. https://doi.org/10.1038/climate.2009.93
5. https://doi.org/10.1038/climate.2009.99
6. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-080337
7. https://www.nature.com/news/we-must-set-planetary-boundaries-wisely-1.10694
8. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12256
9. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab22c9
It also means thinking beyond the SDGs:
1. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-02-2017-0043
2. http://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i4.729
3. https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/disaster-choice/202007/sustainable-development-goal-18
4. https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/disaster-choice/202009/the-sustainable-development-goals-after-five-years
And considering much wider sustainable development agendas:
1. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8959-2_2
2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imic.2015.04.001
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Ecology