My question is: for how much longer are the community of students and teachers to be fooled by confusing theories about macroeconomics?

The universities are full of politically biased narrow-minded teachers of the old and messed-up theories in economics that were spoiled over a century ago when John Bates Clark and his friends responded to the industrialists and unions by claiming wrongly that both land and buildings are capital. The confusion that resulted has enabled student to pass their exams without they or their teachers really needing to properly understand their subject!

My recent book "Consequential Macroeconomics--Rationalizing About How Our Social System Works" has at last converted the old pseudo-science into a real one and I would be most glad to share it for free with any serious/sincere student or teacher. Write to me at  [email protected] for an e-copy. Or if that is too much, at least answer the question posed above.

More David Harold Chester's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions