Flag/Indicator species are known to be representative indicator in large-scale biodiversity conservation. But in a regional or micro-scale urban area, should we still take flagship species as a crucial surrogate/representative index?
If so, what is the proper way to select flagship species in urban area?
If not, how should we assess the biodiversity conservation outcomes in urban area?
Thank you.
I suggest that key or bio-indicators species be investigated for biodiversity conservation at micro-scales urban areas.
I can't think of any specific species that would fit the flagship label in urban ecosystems, since it mostly specifies iconic or symbolic species that characterize the conservation status of the system. It might be more relevant to characterize keystone or indicator species due to the highly managed and strong turnover rate of urban areas. These species instead symbolize the support functions that strengthen the entire community.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Zoology
- Ornithology