Hi,

Months ago, I started a systematic review with a critical approach on engineering education and COVID-19. In the review, I included proposals with a solid empirical evidence that showed alternatives to deal with the pandemic because I identified a gap in this sense. Unfortunately, this work is taking longer than I expected and my biggest concern is not have a consistent amount of papers that synthetize the current panorama of COVID-19, taking into account that my search query was performed in march, 2021.

At this moment, I can not include more papers because of the large number of proposals that only would increase the analysis, delaying much more the review.

So, my question is about what are your recommendations in this case to finish sucessfully this review?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

Jonathan