In your opinion, if a journal organizes the publication of a work in the form of chapters, the quality of the publication is evaluated according to the value of the journal or the value of the publishing house?
It may refer to what is positively appreciated by a single subject, but also to what is found worthy by groups, who may share purposes, preferences, and norms, rather to say yes.
in my opinion, the quality of publication will be evaluated by the value of the journal but I personally prefer to evaluate the quality base on the journal value and publishing house and also with the quality of chapters when I study them
It may refer to what is positively appreciated by a single subject, but also to what is found worthy by groups, who may share purposes, preferences, and norms, rather to say yes.