Dear P. P. Afxenti Do you really believe one or two-dimension static equation that has been written in past, where it does not recognize temperature, pressure, taste, smells, size, colors.... can describe three-dimension of nature that it is changing constantly?

Thank you for sharing

That

“…Physics is the subject of non multiple explanations i.e one and robust, it drives part of 8ts prestige from this.….”

-looks as rather, if too, strange claim. Any/every scientific object/effect/process principally has only unique really scientific explanation; and in any/every science, including physics.

Correspondingly, as that is rigorously scientifically proven in the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s Planck scale informational physical model, in this case it is enough to read one of 2 main papers https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383127718_The_Informational_Physical_Model_and_Fundamental_Problems_in_Physics

- Matter’s spacetime is fundamentally absolute,

- and it is rigorously scientifically shown, that it is fundamentally flat, fundamentally continuous, and fundamentally “Cartesian”, (at least) [4+4+1]4D spacetime with metrics (at least) (cτ,X,Y,Z, g,w,e,s,ct), i.e. is only some (at least) [4+4+1]4D “empty container” that has infinite dimensions;

- which fundamentally cannot be impacted by anything in Matter, including “contracted”, “dilated”, “curved”, etc.; and fundamentally cannot impact on anything in Matter.

Really Gravity fundamentally is nothing else as some fundamental Nature force, and, as the other [Weak, Electric, Nuclear/Strong] Forces, which act in “flat” spacetime [that is another thing that the mainstream physics spacetime really is rather strange, but that is to certain extent outside this thread question], acts in the [4+4+1]4D “flat” spacetime above.

Moreover, Matter is rather simple logical construction, and, as that completely rigorously scientifically shown in the SS&VT model, more see section 6 in the link above, where initial Planck scale models of Gravity, Electric, and Nuclear Forces are presented, at least 3 these Forces act by the same scheme.

More see the link above, SS posts in the threads https://www.researchgate.net/post/NO18How_the_View_of_Space-Time_is_Unified_4-Is_Space-Time_Expansion_a_Space-Time_Creation#view=6703c6197fb0022adf0597ce/1/2/3/1/3/3 , pages 1,2,3,

https://www.researchgate.net/post/NO47What_is_Force_a_Field_Where_is_the_Force_Field_How_does_it_appear_Is_the_Force_Field_a_Regulating_Effect_of_the_Energy-Momentum_Field/2, pages 1,2, and

- [useful comment about what is “space”] https://www.researchgate.net/post/what_is_the_most_important_problem_in_the_theoretical_physics_now#view=6664575e41c39451ce08b623/1680/1681/1680/1683/1683/1683/1683/1684/1683/1685/1685/1686/1685/1685/1686/1685/1687/1686/1685/1689/1689/1688/1690/1691/1700/1758/1758/1759/1764/1765/1764/1765/1766/1768/1768/1769/1768/1769/1769/1769/1770/1769/1770/1769/1769/1770/1771/1769/1770/1771/1771/1772 , page 1769 [and on page 1770, though]

- are relevant to this thread question.

Cheers