The right thing would be for science to stand on one foot in the old knowledge and with the other foot to be ready to kick and change everything. But this is not the case. What we are taught in universities is completely anachronistic when we face reality The bad thing is that we think the new is stupid while the opposite is happening. Of course, it is not the students' fault for what they are learning, but those who did not take care to teach that science is not something fixed and absolute, but a moving sand that changes through research. The biggest problem a researcher faces is not discovering the new and the best, but how he will pass on what he has discovered to the people around him, who think they know everything, because they were taught at the university they attended. The first thing students had to learn at university would be that science is primarily research on the new, and secondly the level of science. But they do not consciously teach it, because universities are ultimately manipulated to prepare people for the existing industry of interests and not to conduct research. It does not surprise me at all that people with open minds understand me, while some educated graduates troll me. No forum of civil engineers in Greece allows me to write about my research with the result that ordinary citizens are more informed about the new in seismic construction technology than civil engineers. Conspiracy or stupidity? Whatever it is, it is not a science. Where are the Greek professors of seismic technology to assist in my research? However, I invite them in good faith to an open scientific discussion to finally see the truth of what I say, that I claim that I defeated the earthquake!

More Ioannis Lymperis's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions