Dr Florian on what criterion we can decide if our model is best suited for repeated indicator approach or two stage model to run the model? like in my case I have two higher order constructs and the whole model including these two higher order construct are reflective-reflective. so Can I choose one of the approaches or there must be some guidelines that I need to follow to decide which method will be better for me. Looking forward for your reply. thanking you in advance.
Dear Shoaib,
I suggest you to see links and attached file on topic.
GENERAL DISTRESS AS SECOND ORDER LATENT ... - Core
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/41166704.pdf
Estimating hierarchical constructs using consistent ... - Emerald Insight
https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/.../IMDS-07-2016-02...
Best regards
Thank you and Jazakallah for sharing links and attached files regarding the above cited topic. much appreciated. Dr. Mourad your Second Link related to https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/.../IMDS-07-2016-02... unfortunately did not work. Can you resend the link again.
Thank you for your understanding.
Warm Regards
Salam Shoaib,
Use only title of link and all links can work good luck.
Best regards
Thank you ...yes you were right it worked like this. This article
"Estimating hierarchical constructs using consistent partial least squares: The case of second-order composites of common factors", the authors ran it with PLSc....PLS Consistent and as a factor model. And I asked the question and it was precisely about running composite reflective two-stage model in SmartPLS...like i am running it as a composite model not factor model which you can run either through CB-SEM or PLSc. But anyways thanks for sharing the valuable links.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Kinesiology
- Running