Is the real scientific research is secret and always hidden in a big research companies? Do you agree with the idea that the real scientific research is unpublished work?
I am believe that ‘authentic’ journal is one that aims to publish research conducted in good faith for the purposes of informing the readership and engaging them in scientific discussion. This is as opposed to so-called ‘fake’ predatory journals, which are more designed to make money on researchers’ pressure to publish by charging for publication and setting very low standards while retaining the trappings and finery of scientific publishing.
Another point to consider that is not part of the question, you could check the journal , However, being included in a big serious commercial citation database, like say Thomson Web of Knowledge or Elsevier Scopus, and DOAJ is a decent base-level indication that a journal is ‘real’.
No, i don't. i think scientific research should be open and logical, that could be helpful for other researcher and that could stop duplication as well.
I have heard rumours of secretive scientific researches especially in warring technology Stock market and appreciation of markets in competing industries as well as cyber generations. Yet, I dont view these as real scientific researches. A real scientific research is the one that is open to public criticisms. It is the one that is put into the public academic domain for other researchers to vouch the findings through a justification of the theories and concepts propounded in similar (replication)
of course it is and thats why some companies asking always not to publish the results if they are sponsoring a research. theses companies have even the wright to make a PhD thesis not public if they are sponsoring the PhD student. I have the experience about that and I am supervising a PhD student suffering from this.
I am believe that ‘authentic’ journal is one that aims to publish research conducted in good faith for the purposes of informing the readership and engaging them in scientific discussion. This is as opposed to so-called ‘fake’ predatory journals, which are more designed to make money on researchers’ pressure to publish by charging for publication and setting very low standards while retaining the trappings and finery of scientific publishing.
Another point to consider that is not part of the question, you could check the journal , However, being included in a big serious commercial citation database, like say Thomson Web of Knowledge or Elsevier Scopus, and DOAJ is a decent base-level indication that a journal is ‘real’.
I agree with Doha's words. There are many scientific journals as a fake and the paper is published within a month, but the real scientific journals take more time minimum 4 months like Thomson Reuters.
Real research has been published. Companies have improved them and commercialized. All the data about radioisotope production is well known. The Idea of Mo-99/Tc-99m generators (heart of nuclear medicine) was never patented. The generators has been prepared in millions by different firms in various countries and sold worldwide.
I don't agree with you. Your question tends to decrease the value of many accessible real scientific researches. The measurements of real scientific research is not only the good content, but also its wide spread, how useful it is by people, and people satisfaction on it. A secret and unknown real scientific research lose its importance and value.
I partially agree with you, I believe that huge research projects that produces paradigm shifting products or even theories is difficult to be found in universities online data bases... However, the available research is still REAL :)
This is the perfect question, I think the real scientific research is a hidden ( top secret) and I agree with you is an unpublished. But, this work at a high level of importance.