Radiation cooling or heating does not consume any work. We welcome guidance from thermal scientists and engineers.
This is a radiation simulation case using COMSOL, which satisfies empirical laws and energy conservation. See image for details
1. This setting includes radiation experience: when the gas density is small, the radiation intensity is proportional to the density, and the absorption coefficient is inversely proportional to the density (the smaller the absorption coefficient, the stronger the absorption capacity)----- Domain 1 gas density=1, Domain 2 gas density=2.,
2. Radiation generates a temperature difference of 2.1 ℃, rendering the second law of thermodynamics invalid.
3. This transposition can be connected in series to generate stronger heating and cooling capabilities, with low cost, and can be industrialized and commercialized.
4. Article Using COMSOL to Prove the Temperature Difference Caused by A...
This article also includes an analysis of the imbalance in calculating radiation. Welcome to read.
Both radiative cooling and heating take advantage of the natural properties of thermal radiation and do not require additional energy input or work to achieve the desired cooling or heating effect. it's important to note that the effectiveness of these processes can be influenced by factors such as the design of the surfaces or materials, environmental conditions, and other variables
Muhammed imamın anlattığına ek olarak Radyasyon bulunduğu ortamı etkiler ve o ortamın şeklini alabilir. Bulunduğu ortamın hacmine etki eder ve o hacmin şeklini alır.
The second law follows from a very simple principle of nature, which is that information is never lost or created, and that the equations of motion are reversible, in the sense that you can deduce the past from the present as well as you can deduce the future.
In classical physics there are often a continuum of possible states in a system (as opposed to quantum mechanics where the Hilbert spaces are separable), which makes the matter of determining the 'amount of information' a bit more complicated. However, if a system can still be simulated to arbitrary precision with a discretization (such that you can record the information of any state of the system in a finite vector), then the second law will apply to that system, given that each future state after a time step will be uniquely determined by a past state before that time step, and vice versa.
The explanation for this is actually quite simple: If the time evolution is one-to-one, it must map the set of all possible states into itself, and thus for all unordered initial states that maps into an ordered final state, the must also be a corresponding ordered state that maps into an unordered state. So even though order might appear out of chaos temporarily, it will always fluctuate back into chaos.
Therefore, when you have an interesting idea for a perpetual motion machine of the second kind that you want to investigate, it is always helpful to ask oneself: Can my idea be simulated by a discrete system? (It sometimes helps to try to simplify the idea and the system first.) And if so, will the equations of motion be reversible, i.e. can I run the simulation backwards in reverse? (If your system behaves according to the laws of physics, they ought to reversible, at least as far as we know.) This might then help one realize what one has missed.
I hope this general tip might be helpful in solving your puzzle. Good luck!
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Chemical Engineering