Hellow.
I have been wondering why we print politicians on money rather than Scientists. My argument is simple:
1. money is taken to hold value ;
2. Science is more valuable than politics;
3. Therefore we should print Scientists on money rather than politicians.
On a personal note, I would much prefer to see Richard Feynman on money than any politician. we can also insert short explanation of each person work and also contribute to the general public general knowledge.
Any Feedback on that idea ?
That would be an insult to Richard Feynman, with respect to the dominant monetary system. In addition, RF did not like honors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEUcmKDaklY
Stephen I. Ternyik Hellow.
I know he did not like honors. I don't think of it as honor as the only cause. The argument was also based on importance and spreading the work via the idea of money. It could be Einstein/ Dirac/Newton instead. You name them my man.
Thanks for commenting.
You may like to read into the following Ohad Manor
https://www.parabola.unsw.edu.au/files/articles/2000-2009/volume-36-2000/issue-1/vol36_no1_1.pdf
https://www.parabola.unsw.edu.au/files/articles/2000-2009/volume-36-2000/issue-2/vol36_no2_1.pdf
Stephen I. Ternyik Thank you very much. I downloaded and I will read.
Best regards my man.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Phytochemistry
- Extracts