27 September 2018 6 9K Report

Hello there, I wonder if anyone may help please?

A slightly longwinded introduction (apologies!)

For my PhD I am using two qualitative methodologies sequentially.

  • Firstly, to explore service user views on how they may construct safety, to have a meaningful life outside of mental healthcare. This will be employing grounded theory.
  • Secondly, for the theory to be explored by mental health clinicians using a focus group, and thematic analysis to examine if, and how the theory may better inform safety planning on a psychiatric ward.
  • Just in case, safety planning is part of risk management in mental health care, but there is debate who determines this safety and how it is defined. For example, Berg, Rørtveit and Aase, (2017) found safety planning (in regard of suicide) could be quite risk adverse for service users in hospital, focusing on limiting life opportunities in case of suicide, whereas service users spoke of suicide risk reducing, when safety planning involved promoting life satisfaction. Hence the rational to explore service user experiences of safety, to strive for a meaningful life outside of healthcare, then examine its potential application to safety planning on a psychiatric ward.

    Finally, my question… I was wondering if pragmatism as a philosophical position was suitable to underpin a ‘qual-qual’ research design as it would be with mixed methods. Also, is anyone aware of literature that discusses pragmatism with multimethod (when multimethod is defined as using two methodologies not just qualitative and quantitative).

    And if possible a second question, is pragmatism perhaps more of a framework to allow combinations of epistemologies to meet the programmatic goal of the research, or an actual paradigm in itself?

    I look forward to any comments, and sorry in advance if I do not respond back straight away.

    Thank you.

    Kris

    More Kris Deering's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions