The theoretical difference is somehow clear for me, but unfortunately, I've not still been able to figure out what's the difference between these two methods in terms of their application in statistical packages.
Let me explain it using my research example, which consists of seven latent variables, and each one contains a considerable number of items/indicators as usual of socio-psychological phenomena. The path model could not be run using indicators and their latent constructs in Lisrel, but it could be run when I create a composite variable out of the indicators for each individual latent variables in SPSS.
- Is this latter method Path Analysis? In other words, the practical difference between SEM and Path Analysis is this fact that in case of a Path Analysis we have to compute a composite variable for latent variables and in case of SEM we must not?
- The other question of mine is whether composite variable should be computed using weighted or unweighted mean?
Thank you in advance,
It is exactly like you thought. An SEM model always consists of a measurement model, which links indicators to latent variables and a structural model, which expresses the (linear) relations between latent variables. A naked structural model is commonly called path analysis. If a model only contains the measurement part that is a confirmatory factor analysis, essentially.
Hi Saeed,
this has often been discussed, for instance here:
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_difference_between_a_regression_analysis_and_SEM
HTH
Holger
http://prof.usb.ve/jjramirez/POSTGRADO/AFC/Art03%20Cap%2017%20Path%20Analysis%20y%20SEM.pdf
https://www.theanalysisfactor.com/four-types-sem/
http://theicph.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/How-to-conduct-Path-Analysis-and-SEM-for-Health-Research_24-Sep-2016_Prof-Bhisma-Murti.pdf
Article Testing Standardized Effects in Structural Equation Modeling...
Dear Prof. Saeed Ehsanfar,
Practical difference between SEM and Path Analysis.
I hope the information will help you.
With Best Wishes,
Samir G Pandya
It is exactly like you thought. An SEM model always consists of a measurement model, which links indicators to latent variables and a structural model, which expresses the (linear) relations between latent variables. A naked structural model is commonly called path analysis. If a model only contains the measurement part that is a confirmatory factor analysis, essentially.
Dear Professors, Martin Schmettow , Samir G Pandya , Cristian Ramos-Vera , Holger Steinmetz
Thank you for all your answers. They helped me a lot.
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Statistics
- Statistical Techniques
- Structural Equation Modeling