05 December 2022 2 9K Report

Hello, everyone. This is my first time to do drug distribution research. Our drugs were sent out for radiolabeling and PET/CT to analyze distribution in organs. We are reading papers to learn how to exactly analyze data. We notice that both %ID and %ID/g are used in papers and %ID/g seems to be more common. Looks like the %ID represents the drug or radiolabel uptake in a specific organ and %ID/g stands for the uptake per gram of this organ. We don't know if our understanding is right. We also have concern about the use of %ID/g. Do we need to use the real organ weight to calculate %ID/g? Many papers reported %ID/g of long monitors in animals without displaying tissue weight. If they did not harvest tissues then how they got the tissue weight to calculate %ID/g at different timepoint? We consulted some technicians and they told us the tissue weight was estimated through 1 gram times tissue volume (ROI). So the tissue weight is actually an estimated value. We wondered if it is accurate to use an estimated tissue weight to calculate %ID/g. We feel like the real weight is better.

Thank you for help.

More Herui Wang's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions