Dear collegue,

For me, it's just literature or science fiction ... and the bad one.

The alleged prophecies are written in ambiguous language that "predict" almost anything, according to the expectations or interests of the reader.

A phenomenon of pareidolia, in short.

As for the exegetes of Nostradamus, they are naive, or unscrupulous merchants.

Best regards.

I agree with Gustavo Chalier . If such foretelling is correct then let the exegetes see a future bad events and prevent it . According to their claim the Gulf war and many other catastrophes were predicted ! So why were they silent before these crisis and no action taken to stop these disasters ?

You are right, Abdul-Sahib Hasani: the problem with all these prophecies is that they can only be analyzed (and understood in their entirety) post eventum.

As they are not formulated in clear language and never say, for example: "In this year there will be a war in East Asia or earthquake in Southern Europe", always a connection is sought with a known fact that to be known, had that have already happened.

The value of these prophecies, therefore, is null.

We in Argentina have a series of "prophecies" written and illustrated by Benjamín Solari Paravicini in the mid-twentieth century, which are interesting as an artistic game ... and it's fun to see his exegetes, that every so often, especially after the elections, said: "This candidate has won, as predicted Benjamin Solari Paravicini."

It's really very funny!

Hello, Dear.

Read my book, you will see all you need...

Best regards.