Dear all,
I have a question:
If you’re developing a new theoretical framework (e.g., a modified spacetime model with internal consistency and analytic derivations), how do you handle empirical or numerical demonstrations in your first publication?
– Do you include test runs or simulations already in the first paper (even if they are basic or illustrative)?
– Or do you focus the first paper entirely on the conceptual foundation, and postpone any validation or visual modeling to a follow-up work or appendix?
I’m currently working on a model that describes gravity and black holes using frequency-based segmentation of spacetime. The theory is logically self-contained, but I’m debating whether basic wave propagation simulations or metric visualizations should be included already or if that would dilute the clarity of the conceptual core.
Would love to hear how you approach this in your own work, especially when introducing frameworks that reinterpret classical GR assumptions.
Preprint Segmented Spacetime - A Frequency-Based Framework for Gravit...
Great question about simulations! I actually read your segmented spacetime paper - fascinating approach to reinterpreting quantum mechanics through discrete frequency structures.
Regarding your simulation question: I think numerical demonstrations would significantly strengthen your framework, particularly because some of the key concepts (like segment density encoding gravitational phenomena and the N₀ = 4 matter emergence condition) could benefit from concrete visualisation.
I faced exactly this decision while developing my quantum gravity framework. I included numerical simulations validating the theoretical predictions in the foundational paper, and I think it was crucial because:
- Abstract concepts become much clearer with visual demonstrations
- Simulations can reveal emergent behaviours not obvious from the formalism
- It also helps you to refine your approach more and serves as strong evidence of your theory's self-consistency.
- Provides concrete examples of the theory's behaviour
However, in my case, I kept them focused and directly relevant to the core claims rather than exploring every possible application. So the conceptual narrative stayed clear.
For your work specifically, I'd suggest simulating:
- How segment density variations produce gravitational-like effects
- The discrete evolution process leading to matter emergence at N₀ = 4
- Frequency interference patterns in your geometric uncertainty principle. Your frequency-based reinterpretation is genuinely creative - how do you plan to connect the segmental quantisation to observable phenomena? I'd be curious to see how your discrete temporal structures manifest in measurable predictions.
Introduce your scientists to new science on the channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@energyscientist777
Aswathy Prakash Thekkepurakkal Prakashan Thank you for your reply. We started to test with data. Thanks again for the ideas.
Vasiliy Karpenko Yeah... present it to your 11 followers... somewhat not interested. Got more followers on my own channel. Bye...
Vasiliy Karpenko Stop abusing questions of other people for selfmarketing. Sadly there is neither a delete nor downvote button here. It's annoying!
I read your article.
Conclusion: it does not have a technological future.
Vasiliy Karpenko The opinion of a guy who needs to sneak through boards leaving links to his creepy Youtube channel with 11 followers... Just spare us your "conclussions", OK? Just have some respect and just leave...
Frau, Carmen Wrede!
I don't understand your position.
1. I sincerely wanted to help you with the issue of physics and mathematics, space-time, since this topic is familiar to me.
2. The spin phase is a small stroke in the general theory of energy-informational analysis of the movement of material systems.
3. Every Spin in Nature is determined by the joint Action of the fundamental laws of physics: conservation, change, transfer and packing of matter (the triad of energies: general, passive, active).
4. The spin quantizes its phase by 30o. (this is confirmed by the hadron collider).
5. In my videos, the spin model is shown in the figure on slide 6.1 (it's a pity in the Russian version, the figure was missed in the English version). And on slide No. 6, the spin of our galaxy with the speeds of stars is studied with gravity and without gravity.
The fact of the existence of a deeper force than gravity, which rotates all stars at the same speed at a large distance from the center of the galaxy, has been established.
6. The expansion of the Universe creates a hyperbolic spiral around Spin. And radial and tangential motions are related by the hyperbolic relationship of space-time. Therefore, the "golden section" is a complex value in relation to the translational radial motion.
7. I try to make my research technological in the matter of motion in physical space.
That's all I wanted to say.
Therefore, sorry for the disturbance.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Bioecology
- Systems Ecology
- Landscape Ecology
- Connectivity