I find that experiential insight into ontology or the deeper core level of reality comes through a process of loving empathic communion with other individuals and one's own life experience, as suggested by Martin Buber's dictum that "all real living is meeting." Communion produces insight into the intrinsically relational, connective, contextual, shared, interdynamic nature of reality. In two books that I have recently published (listed on my ResearchGate profile, with sample chapters), I and the other authors discuss how non-dualistic heartfelt communion produces appreciative insight into how everyone and everything is truly "beautiful in their own way," intrinsically lovable, precious, and irreplaceable in their natural particularity and natural genuineness. For a summary of my views about how deeply invested communion can enhance appreciative insight into the lovable quality of ontology, reality, and individual living beings, please see my attached blog, "The Co-Creative Muse."
I've bypassed this question for a while because it bothered me: are thinking of the questions of being as a personal worldview or a personal worldview as a condition of one's being?
Check out Ashok K. Gangadean's "Comparative Ontology: relative and absolute truth," (1980) Philosophy East and West. Where he mentions comparative or across worldviews, think of any two people with different worldviews.