Firstly - 'Open innovation' is the term used to describe this process, this involves engaging with parties external to the company and in the purest sense enabling unsolicited approaches with new product or service ideas. Traditionally companies innovated internally or used consultants etc. who were contracted. Occasionally public were engaged through competitions etc. in all cases there was a contractual agreement that the Intellectual property (IP) would belong to the company. This potential minefield of receiving unsolicited ideas and then being sued when the company launches a product even remotely similar tends to inhibit Open Innovation in its most 'Open' form and companies employing this will generally implement some form of control process.
In terms of how companies screen ideas - most large companies will have a formal innovation process - often referred to as an 'Innovation funnel'. At different stages there will be a formal review process where ideas are either accepted or rejected before the next stage of development begins. However there are also a number of process used between these gates, particularly during the early stages of ideation and concept generation. There are a number of methods that can be used some qualitative, some quantitative depending on the level of development and the aspects being assessed. At an ideas level it is usually assessed either by experts within the company, SWOT analysis, focus groups of consumers and so on. An idea can be assessed on many levels, market potential, consumer benefits, technical feasibility, business fit, etc. At a later stage as the idea is transformed into a design concept these will often be evaluated against the Product Design Specification (PDS) which may use weighting to provide a single point score. Other tools such as quality function deployment (QFD) can also be used.
However, coming back to my first point, most companies will return an unsolicited idea for a new product from outside the company unopened for the potential legal reasons mentioned.
I would add that you must get all the perspectives into the room: The users who would use the product; The design and production teams who would get the product out; The sales and marketing teams who meet customers across segments; The finance and legal staff to take care of the costs, pitfalls and opportunities from their angles.
Have a session with presentations from each of the product champion teams. You will get a winner, or you may get ideas for a hybrid winner!
Thank you Prof. Dhananjay for your response. Yes of course i agree with you.. brainstorming is a good way of collecting new ideas.. Actually I wanted to know how companies SELECT the most feasible ideas..to proceed with...
Companies, especially large companies, will have to start with idea matrix to find a recurrence idea. Then follow formal approach suggested above. Idea matrix is relatively new. It is something like having a grid in a square box with different groups (or sources of ides) place on right and bottom axes. The essence is to identify the dominant idea across all groups/sources. Remember, today's business environment is highly integrated, automated and globalized. Many organisations would prefer going global to leverage on the advantages of the convergence technologies. Therefore, an idea that are likely to be limited to a particular group of audience is less preferable in modern organisations. Thus, developing a product that appeal to a larger audience requires distilling ideas from the difference sources. It is idea matrix that enable the distillation to be effected.