1) What I am introducing as new to the science of earthquake technology, and at last you start to understand it, is that it is wrong when you just place the construction on the ground.

When there is no combination of compound of the soil with the construction, all the inertia tensions are converted into turns - torques and transferred to the cross sections of the bearing elements, of the beam, of the column, and of the slab.

2) When there is construction and ground consolidation, all inertia tensions are diverted and driven into the ground and not over the cross sections that are currently being sent.

3) There is a big difference from consolidation, in, consolidation.

a) By screwing the base of a small and square cross-section of the column with the ground the benefit is small.

b) If we screw on both sides, the base of an elongated wall with the ground the benefit is too much.

c) By screwing together the upper edges of an elongated wall with the ground, the benefit is unimaginably even greater.

d) If we screw on both sides, at each corner, all the upper edges of a building, made entirely of reinforced concrete, with the ground, we get the greatest benefit we can have.

The reason is simple, it has to do with the lever arm, and the elasticity.

https://www.zougla.gr/greece/article/ergodigos-epinoise-elpidofora-antisismiki-evresitexnia

More Ioannis Lymperis's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions