29 July 2021 3 2K Report

Dear researchers,

I would like to ask about the differences between moderation and moderated mediation analysis? And how to make hypotheses in a moderated mediation relationship?

For example, in a model like this (see attached file), if I am curious about whether corporate image moderates the relationship between customer satisfaction(the moderator) and repurchase intention, do I only do a moderation analysis or a second stage moderated mediation analysis?

If I am going to do moderated mediation, am I testing whether corporate image moderates the mediation effect of customer satisfaction on repurchase intention? I cannot relate to any practical implications of this moderated mediation analysis? Moreover, if making hypotheses, should I say: corporate image moderates the indirect effect of customer experience on repurchase intention through customer satisfaction?

My point is if I am only interested in whether corporate image moderates the relationship between customer satisfaction and repurchase intention, as customer satisfaction is a mediator, do I have to do moderated mediation analysis? what's its advantage compared with merely moderation analysis?

Could anyone recommend some papers that conducted moderated mediation analysis? I want to see how they make hypotheses, and how to interpret the findings. Although I have read the paper by Andrew F. Hayes (2015) "An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation", I still feel not very clear.

Thank you all

Best Regards

Kara

Similar questions and discussions