Which of the following is the best for estimating phonon contribution: a non-magnetic analogue or Debye-Einstein model?
Hi,
I suggest you see the links on the topic.
Article A Model for Calculating the Heat Capacity of Aqueous Solutio...
Article Machine Learning Prediction of Heat Capacity for Solid Inorganics
Article Modelling of Heat Flow When Thermal Conductivity, Specific H...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0017931018326401
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167732220341659
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2009/2009.08896.pdf
Best regards
The Debye-Einstein model is typically better for estimating phonon contribution than a non-magnetic analogue.
The Debye-Einstein model assumes that all phonons have the same energy and that the vibrational frequencies of the atoms are distributed according to a Debye or Einstein distribution. This model is based on statistical mechanics and has been widely used to estimate phonon contribution in solids.
In contrast, a non-magnetic analogue assumes that the magnetic properties of a material are not relevant to its phonon behavior. While this approach may be useful in some cases, it does not take into account the full complexity of phonon behavior in a material and may not be as accurate as the Debye-Einstein model.
- Badges
- Science topic