I am running subgroup analysis (adult vs. child) and meta-regression on a set of data using Comprehensive Meta Analysis.

(1) The overall effect size using basic stat (Random Effect, log odds ratio) is 0.778.

The meta-regression using intercept only is 0.778.

When I group studies by age, mixed effect analysis produce point estimate of overall effect 0.780.

Overall effect sizes for fixed effects model are the same for three methods.

(2) The subgroup analysis produce Q-value 0.753 for mixed effect analysis.

The regression produces Q value of 0.662 for "test of the model" line.

The total between study variance for the two methods are the same.

The N is same for all analysis.

My understanding is that the three numbers in (1) should be equal and the two numbers in (2) should be equal since they are essentially calculating the same thing when there are only two subgroups.

Could someone explain why the numbers are different ?

Thank you!

Similar questions and discussions