It can be said that the effective performance and effectiveness of the methods of understanding the world in any field of science and knowledge is similar to a mechanism similar to Darwin's principle of natural selection. Various methods are used by humans, but what is effective and capable of survival remains!

Implicitly, this approach contains Popper's falsifiability in a structured manner. Where is the element of challenging the scientific theories? Is this element based in the mechanism of human thinking? Or her desire to know more about the world? Whatever it is, it seems that in an endless effort, man uses various theories to understand the world, and these theories find the most effective form in his critique. The theory remains for some time until the new discoveries of other people challenge these theories in another attempt and finally the new theory swallows the old theory in itself! And the work will be repeated again!

More Seyed Mohammad Mousavi's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions