How can commissions selecting candidates for education judge scientific competence of the candidates when the commissions do not master the science literature because of language constraints? Are communication skills more important than the contents of what is transmitted for education in these selection procedures?
For instance, if it is clearly explained and understood by the students it must definitely be true?
It is understood that there will always be those constraints from a foreign language. We do not always speak the language so you need to make efforts and progress always to be as good as native speakers.
It is important how we formulate sentences so as to be understood by everyone.
There is obviously a consistent difference in language training level between a native speaker and other speakers. There are also talented and untalented native speakers, which allows at least some overlap in language expression abilities between native speakers and other speakers.
Anyway, if you don't master the language used in the literature exploited for education and science education, there is a problem with the adequate knowledge flow between the different members constituting the education and science environment.
If a foreign language is not more than a tool to get access to relevant research-related information, does language belong to the 'technical' or 'scientific' compartment of research activities?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science
- Computer Communications (Networks)
- Internet