I'm looking for the criteria used to evaluate construct "quality." We recently published a paper (see link) about a practical tool for evaluating whether two constructs measure the same phenomenon (no respondents needed), but for a follow-up paper we need to go deeper and develop an evaluative framework based on past thinking both on what a construct IS and how one evaluates them. Any help appreciated!
Article A Tool for Addressing Construct Identity in Literature Revie...
Dear Kai,
I can not figure out how I can contribute to or assist you in your study. Are you doing some counterbalancing , factor analysis or path analysis?
Hi Rahimi,
This is more about creating a list of all the different perspectives of how one evaluates a construct (usually a set of questions purporting to measure the phenomenon--for example self-efficacy). Would you be willing to remove the copies of your post? Kai :-)
hi I dont why there are copies my reply , interesting !
Isn't factor analysis? whats concept is under study?
Thanks for your answer, Thomas. Some very helpful thoughts to follow up on here. :)
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Statistics
- Statistical Techniques
- Structural Equation Modeling