Yes...it can begin with Maxwell...

Data From the Maxwell TREATIES concerning "gravitational energy"

Dark energy does not exist, and although there is indirect evidence that dark matter or energy does exist... The scientific community, we must find a true interpretation of how gravity works. General Relativity gives us very solid mathematical evidence to believe that it exists, but it tells us something that we have to interpret the deformation or curvature of space-time, in another, deeper way. There must be a real explanation, and dark matter or energy, I am sure it is not.

Mohamed Makraini "Dark energy does not exist..."

Such a personal belief is not helpful. A consideration of the negative energy density of gravitational fields is needed.

there is an effect, only gravitational, relevant to several huge volumes of space in galaxies which has the same effect of huge masses in bending light and determining a profile of the velocities of the galaxy which in the absence of that would be much slower.

Dark because it is unknown, but as a matter of fact it is transparent (no Electro Magnetic interaction)... but should be better classified as "missing mass"... then somebody made the arbitrary choice that it should be "another kind of matter".

It might be only a missing energy due to a primordial annihilation of matter and antimatter which left a localized missing energy in the positive energy density of the background.

Wolfgang - as usual you will object or ignore (or both) but iSpace theories major progress is not only deriving exact values and with this integer geometry basing on and for 50+ constants of nature (no other model or theory was able to do this in the history of scienice, let one with he required mandatory experimental precision of (typically) 8-9 to for some like Ryfberg constant 12-14 digits (let alone make exact predictions ad enabled by integer geometry).

That said, it’s clear (at least to me) key equations derived clearly indicate to a space / subspace combination, in the following form:

10D spacetime = 3D space + 6D subspace + 1D fully discretized time

Now the 6D subspace is where the Maxwell style vortex arrangements rotatimg with speed of light c at the outmost birder pose where all the massive energy density is actually stored in (c^4/G to be precise) which is easy to see, as G in iSpace-SI units is just Volt Ampere Second^5/Meter^5 or Volt Ampere Second / Meter (aka force) decided by c^4 (with exactly 3/(299792458*10^3)^4 Newton being the iSpace derived exact qusntum of gravitational force.

https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/cosmic-simulation-reveals-how-black-holes-grow-and-evolve? this has some interesting JWST data that may relate.

also consider in light of Pearlman SPIRAL where all beyond SPIRAL light year radius i we see from radius i, i years ag, from the cosmic inflation expansion epoch that ended early in history. By the end of which the universe attained mature size, density and gravitational bound equilibrium.

the more distant the stellar object, the earlier during that transition the light we see it from (assuming arriving here at standard light speed) departed.

So no Dark Matter or Dark Energy required to account for past hyper density and energy intensity.

reference Pearlman YeC cosmological redshift hypothesis and model on researchgate

To my knowledge, succesful attempts to solve DM and DE are the following:

by Gary Nash

Preprint Modified General Relativity and dark energy

by Asher Yahalom

Article Retarded Gravity in Disk Galaxies

the principle they start from is very different.

Christian G. Wolf "...as usual you will object or ignore (or both) but iSpace theories major progress is..."

Sorry, but discussing the major progress of iSpace theory is off-topic here.

Roger M. Pearlman Yec , Stefano Quattrini

The presence of an omnipresent dark energy with a density of 1.0E+34J/m³ inserts a new player in the game about dark matter.

Every mass, even the mass of a single particle or a photon, creates a small dent in the dark energy density. If the particle moves relative to the dark energy at rest, the dent moves with it. Then a tiny amount of dark energy must avoid the moving dent. Avoiding the dent implies a movement, which costs a tiny amount of energy. This energy must be provided by the moving particle, which loses some of its kinetic energy.

But with this effect we have identified a source of energy for the dark energy in the background. This source is the interior of stars, with an extremely high density of fast moving particles and photons. But this means that the omnipresent dark energy gains a lot of additional energy from the activity inside stars.

Additional energy means an increased energy density. Increased energy density leads to a density gradient with a gravitational impact.

The gravitational impact of the increased density caused by star activity is opposite to the reduced density caused by a mass.

This means in the near vicinity of a star, the gravitational impact of the star mass is partially screened by the gravitational impact of the enhanced energy density caused by the star activity.

But there is a difference between the gravitational impact of mass and star activity. The gravitational impact of star activity vanishes as soon as the increased density has declined to the background density. The gravitational impact of mass never vanishes.

This means that in distances where the gravitational impact of star activity just has vanished, the original gravitational impact of the star mass suddenly appears, apparently out of nothing.

This appearance is confused with the impact of dark matter.

The ENERGY FIELD postulated by Maxwell to have a background "potential" energy positive definite, must be also the one where both Electromagnetic waves and Gravitational waves propagate and provide a "positive energy" That energy is depleted from the region where masses collide due to gravitation for example or due to electric fields.

Such a background is nothing but the old AETHER.

The dark matter effect might be caused by a local absence of background energy due to a primordial annihilation of matter antimatter.

Stefano Quattrini "Such a background is nothing but the old AETHER."

It would be the old AETHER if it determines the propagation of electromagnetic waves. But if a movement of this medium does not have an influence on the propagation of electromagnetic waves, it is not exactly that AETHER.

That is at least the idea of Maxwell which I think is right

Stefano Quattrini

What exactly is the idea of Maxwell? That there is an AETHER with an influence on electromagneteic wave propagation, or that there is no AETHER at all, or that there is an AETHER, but without an influence on electromagnetic wave propagation?

Wolfgang Konle

with epsilon0 and mu0

and the same is responsible of the gravitational effects

Dears,

In my new proposal, I tried to explain the reason behind dark matter, and abnormal mass of mesons and bosons.

Article Mass Increase with Strong and Gravitational Potentials, and ...

Stefano Quattrini "That there is an AETHER with an influence on electromagneteic wave propagation,>>

with epsilon0 and mu0 "

Why was the MM experiment not successful in showing the existence of that AETHER?

Wolfgang Konle ,

MM experiment measured if the two-way SOL showed an anisotropy.

It is well known that the constancy of the two-way SOL does in no way single out any preferred frame.

On the contrary...

Preprint Length contraction as a necessary consequence of the two-way...

Stefano Quattrini "It is well known that the constancy of the two-way SOL does in no way single out any preferred frame."

In the meantime (independent from the MM experiment), the constant one way speed of light also has been proven.

Wolfgang Konle ,

not at all and it is not true in general unless it is an isotropic frame like in Sagnac where all the other moving frames are not.

Stefano Quattrini

What about GPS? The distances derived always are the same and do not depend on the absolute orientation in space.

The ECIF is isotropic, so that GPS moving in ECIF have Sagnac..