Within the field of foreign policy analysis, especially, its application to the foreign policy and intervention behaviour of African states, scholars have argued that more than one IR approach is required to fully explain their FP and intervention behaviour. The question then is, how many approaches should be employed, if it is true that one approach is insufficient? Should we simply add more and more perspectives to get a fuller view with each step? Or is there an epistemological outer limit of applying a multi-perspective eclectic approach when analysing these FP and intervention behaviours ?