I thought you might be interested in the following experiment done in the University of Ottawa, about Quantum Entanglement in which the state has been determined in that symbol of Ancient Taoism, of a Unity in Duality, which in my own work is represented by means of Unity of two complementaries, I mean differentes entities, such as Time and Space, not reduced the one to the other, as is done, normally in main stream Physics.

I thought you might be interested to know that the University of Ottawa in an experiment about quantum entanglement(see attachment), found that symbol of Unity in Duality, that ancient Taoism had found a long time ago, I mean that circle that includes, both the Yin and Yang concept, that as a matter of fact, is that same symbol I have represented in my work as I have called a Basic Unit System concept based on complex numbers, that permits to represent two different orders of reality such as Time and Space, that in general are reduced in main stream physics the one to the other, even though the father of Quantum Mechanics when he represented that duality of wave-particle by means of his famous Complex’s wave equation, stablished clearly a new framework that was not reductionist anymore, and as so he complained in his colloquium of 1952, when he wrote:

“Let me say at the outset, that in this discourse, I am opposing not a few special statementa of quantum mechanics held today, I am opposing as it were the whole of it, l am opposing its basic views that have been shaped 25 years ago, when Max Born put forward his probability interpretation, which was accepted by almost everybody. It has been worked out in great detail to form a scheme of admirable logical consistency that has been inculcated ever since to every young student of theoretical physics.

The view I am opposing is so widely accepted, without ever being questioned, that I would have some difficulties in making you believe that I really, consider it inadequate and wish to abandon it. It is, as I said, the probability view of quantum mechanics. You know how it pervades the whole system, it always implied in everything a quantum theorist tells you. Nearly every result he pronounces is about the probability of this or that or that . . . happening-with usually a great many alternatives. The idea that they be not alternatives but all really happen simultaneously seems lunatic to him, just impossible. "

Edgar Paternina

[email protected]

The most fundamental concept that would help us to understand Quantum entanglement is that this process is non-local.

your question could be asked even in worse way, imagine different reference frames moving with different directions and velocities which would cause different appearance of measurements to each of them. by keeping in mind that this process is non-local due to special relativity, we can try to imagine what is happening. how ever, it's accepted that the first measurement causes collapse.

I hope this answer helps you. some philosophy books like d'Espagnat books can help you to have a better understanding about these concepts.

When knowing Clifford translation connecting any two wave functions as points on three-dimensional sphere (see, for example, Alexander Soiguine "The Torsion Mechanics" and references therein) it follows that the result of measurement of any observable by one wave function immediately gives the result of (not made) measurement by another wave function. When assuming observables are also identified by points on three-dimensional sphere, we get that measurements of any number of observables by arbitrary set of wave functions are simultaneously available.

This is geometrically clear and unambiguous explanation of strict connectivity of the results of measurements instead of quite absurd “entanglement” in conventional quantum mechanics.

Dear Professor,

Will it be possible for you to contribute a Book Chapter in this topic in our edited book on Quantum Computing to be published by Elsevier...?

Regards,

GC Deka