What's wrong with stars, which generated all but H and He elements? No need for poor single particles to look for each other in some special meeting places.

Dear Victor!

Cautiously speaking, the image of particles and nuclei in contemporary physics is characterized less by a clear analysis of observations than by wishful thinking.

If we follow the path of analysis, we recognize electrons and positrons as the elementary building blocks of particles and nuclei, i.e. of all material matter. For example, every particle shower ends in electrons, positrons and energy.

These two particles form the light mesons, which in turn are the building blocks of heavy particles and nuclei. More about it in the link.

If you have worked your way to this knowledge, you can only feel pity for 'modern' physics.

Thesis The Reason of a realistic View to Particles and Atomic Nuclei

Now just waiting for a tin foil hat peddler to arrive.

Vladimir Dusevich :

Physicists have been waiting for decades for a quark particle peddler to finally arrive.

What do you mean: are the "quarks" top or flop?

Dear Dr. Hans-G. Hildebrandt,

Alas! You are right in principle. But we go further than a simple negation. In my opinion, simple negation without creation of new understandings is unreasonable and even adverse. I think that present experimental and observational basis gives a possibility of formulation the common understanding of nature with no models in its basis. We try to make this idea understood. A continuous theory should exist from origination of Universe to explanation of solar phenomena, including origination of all atomic nuclei, and understanding of such a principal phenomenon as life. Until such a theory is absent, we no nothing real about nature. At present, models and approximate mathematics without fixation of the degree of approximation are the scourge for sciences, although, they are the driving force for the progress in engineering. Engineering is the most important form of human activity, but, in my opinion, the boundary between science and engineering should pass in the terminological plan through the use or disuse of models in the initial point of reasoning. We put the problem of formulation of such a science on nature in the journal “Life(Basel)” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235342937_Life_Origination_Hydrate_Hypothesis_LOH-Hypothesis

I hope, we made something in this direction through formulation of the PFO-CFO Theory of Solar System Formation and Transformation based at its initial logical point on the experimentally found mass defect phenomenon and continued up to the mechanisms of the Sun functioning and formation of all known atomic nuclei, for example,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333754868_Solar_protuberances_their_nature_function_and_potential_threat_to_the_Earth's_population_in_the_context_of_the_PFO-CFO_Theory_of_Solar_System_Formation_and_Transformation_Presentation and

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320187190_Massovye_vymirania_vidov_priciny_Fanerozojnyh_vymiranij_i_vozmoznost_povtorenia_podobnyh_avlenij_v_budusem_Plenarnaa_lekcia (the last can be interpreted to English with the Google Translator), and through formulation of the Life Origination Hydrate Theory (LOH-Theory) based at its initial logical point on the experimentally made three discoveries relating to natural phenomena, for example,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265255386_Life_Origination_Hydrate_Theory_LOH-Theory_and_the_Explanation_of_the_Biological_Diversification .