Hans-G. Hildebrandt

20 Questions 246 Answers 0 Followers

Questions related from Hans-G. Hildebrandt

What about the theories of β-decays and the W- and Z-Bosons?

The great experiment at the LHC has proven the non-existence of quarks. But current theories claim that 'quarks' are the decaying particles if β-electrons resp. β-positrons arise. If the theories...

20 October 2019 5,238 3 View

Is the cause of the β+-decay of atomic nuclei a hidden pair production?

The electron-positron pair production and the β+-transformation of atomic nuclei require the same minimum energy of 1,022MeV.The competing processes of the β+-transformation of an atomic nucleus...

02 February 2017 7,569 71 View

What gives us the security to predict: matter can be compressed at dimensions equal to or smaller as the mathematical calculated Schwarzschild radius?

Maybe a very high mass star can itself compress to very high matter density.But what observations lead to the assumption, a smaller object could collapse at Schwarzschild dimension?I remind the...

25 November 2016 3,220 32 View

Why do not exist certain quark-combinations?

The quark theory assigns certain quark combinations to the different particles, par example:Proton p = (uud)Neutron n = (udd)ngative delta Δ– = (ddd)ngative omega Ω– = (sss)Provided that the quark...

21 August 2016 1,554 4 View

Does physics overlooks some significant minor details? (2)

The electron-positron pair production as well as the β+-emission require a minimum energy of 1,022MeV. Therefore it can be stated that the underlying cause of the β+-emission is a...

26 April 2016 7,018 30 View

Are electrical carge and spin of electron/positron two sides of the same coin?

The spin is classically declared by comparison with a rotary motion of particles. But this is impossible like Bohr's assumption, the electrons circulate around the atomic nucleus. It should be...

11 November 2015 4,478 6 View

What caused space and time?

Space and time don't exist obviously without matter. The assumption is incorrect respectively wrong that space and time are objective present or existing and the matter only overmoulding or...

29 October 2015 4,281 60 View

Do non-superconductive materials also show the Podkletnow-Effect?

Superconductive materials like Niob, which are rotating at high speed deform the gravitational field. You can name it Podkletnow-Effect. Do non-superconductive materials also show a small effect,...

25 June 2015 9,664 3 View

Are there only 61 elementary particles?

We have to expect that theoretical physics needs even more than 61 particles to declare the world of real particles and atomic nuclei. Otherwise was the proof of 'quarks' at LHC a failure. You can...

01 January 1970 1,299 27 View

Is physics able to declare observations (experimantal fidings etc) without always bear the theories in mind?

Contemplation on a Black Spot (Author: W. Engelhardt) We remember the picture of an anomaly in the centre of M87. This anomaly can have several causes. The explorers are convinced that they saw a...

01 January 1970 5,717 29 View

Contemporary physics - an exact science or a breeding ground for theories?

Contemporary physics is from the view of particle physics a breeding ground for theories which quite misses a serious analysis of all the comprehensive facts collected over decades. The amount of...

01 January 1970 5,666 35 View

Was the Podklednov-experiment also performed with a large rotating mass at normal temperatures??

Podklednov et al have gravity influenced by a rotating superconductive disk. The experiment has limited size dimensions because of very low temperatures etc. Was this experiment ever performed by...

01 January 1970 8,682 5 View

"Black Hole" or simply an Explosion?

A picture was published a few days ago. It shows ostensible a "Black Hole" within the galaxy M87. Looks like an explosion of a nova or an explosion of a whole cluster of this galaxy. The...

01 January 1970 4,833 8 View

Is it possible that a particle crossed the space uninfluenced for eternity?

In contrast to the theoretical space of mathematics is the real physical space never free from any form of matter. Therefore it is impossible that any particle crossed the space uninfluenced for...

01 January 1970 4,609 30 View

Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?

All planetary systems have similar formation conditions. It is to be expected that the arrangement of the different celestical bodies within the system is always about the same: Central star -...

01 January 1970 1,474 9 View

Why are K0S and and K0L considered as particles and antiparticles?

Particles and antiparticles have the same mass and lifetime. They each decay into equal particles with opposite charges. Not so these particles. Their lifetimes are very different and their decays...

01 January 1970 5,764 9 View

Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?

All planetary systems have similar formation conditions. It is to be expected that the arrangement of the different celestical bodies within the system is always about the same: Central star -...

01 January 1970 3,631 3 View

Are atomic nuclei spatial particle lattices?

If one approaches the nucleus and particle world on analytical way and not with the usual theoretical-mathematical thought processes, then atomic nuclei become visible as spatial particle...

01 January 1970 7,945 9 View

Are quarks theoretical fantasies?

The detection of quarks has always failed so far. Shouldn't that be sufficient evidence for their non-existence? As we know, quarks were invented to explain the structure of proton, neutron and...

01 January 1970 3,547 100 View

Do we have always the knowledge to produce energy by not dangerous nuclear processes?

There are some different and independently experimental references to nuclear processes at low energy (called LENR). This reactions are characterised by high energy release and apparent no...

01 January 1970 4,701 7 View