Is the marketing of the results of scientific research a basic criterion for evaluating the efficiency and quality of research
Hello
No, the basic creterion for evaluating the efficiency and quality of Research are the ability of research to treat a problem or leading to a step on developing in the field of sientific research also a good design of the research and using of a good and an updating references.
Regards
Hello
No, the basic creterion for evaluating the efficiency and quality of Research are the ability of research to treat a problem or leading to a step on developing in the field of sientific research also a good design of the research and using of a good and an updating references.
Regards
It depends some research are aimed at statistical or data collection
Some are meant for building theories (theoretical math )
Some like mine are product oriented communication or devices , so we need to have a fair understanding of market or product relevance ...
If the research is not of high quality, then no matter how much marketing is involved, it doesn't make it better.
Dear sir
Link may be help you
Appreciate your efforts… best wishes
https://books.google.iq/books?id=a8mjR90bcOkC&pg=PA109&lpg=PA109&dq=Is+the+marketing+of+the+results+of+scientific+research+a+basic+criterion+for+evaluating+the+efficiency+and+quality+of+research?&source=bl&ots=ADmrNYNyzQ&sig=utmaNcEnUgHH-8MmYbk0OHaLyg8&hl=ar&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiYjtqb88jYAhUSalAKHQaaBzQQ6AEIKTAB#v=onepage&q=Is%20the%20marketing%20of%20the%20results%20of%20scientific%20research%20a%20basic%20criterion%20for%20evaluating%20the%20efficiency%20and%20quality%20of%20research%3F&f=false
No.
To me, it is the benefit of mankind.
If my research can assist the mankind, then I am a successful researcher.
We all agree that marketing should not be playing any role in determining research quality. But is it really so in real life?
For me personally, marketing and defining research quality/credibility does not go together.
In it's essence, a relevant and credible research outcome should push the research frontier. It should, but it does not always - this is where predatory journals come into action -> just for the sake of vanity, pure promotion and advertising.
No; it is rather a criterion for promoting and increasing the visibility of the scientific research.
The quality of a research is never determined by marketing strategies. It is how well the researcher carefully followed the requirements and ethics in scientific research. Marketing is just an avenue to promote the international visibility and readability of the paper. Its eventual reference and citation is as a result of the usefulness and richness of its contents to practice.
No because the efficiency and quality of some research may remain unknown and/or unused for generations. Examples include finite differences, calculus, Newton's laws, etc.
Evaluation of so-called development research relation can be judged by market value.
However, evaluation of basic research can not be evaluated by market value alone. Because evaluation of basic research can only be judged in a long time.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Microbiology
- Scientific Research