Statistical analysis is one of the most used and misused weapon of information/misinformation not only today but in the history of mankind. It is said numbers do not lie but they do through statistics. Always it is a good thing to have wider space of samples, but the space from which sample collected is also dependent on what our project is (if it is to search for behaviors that depend on local or global parameters ). If a person wants to do research on his/her own institution based on data from there, then of course the sample should be there. But if the study is to get a broader understanding and comparison is involved, then data sample should be beyond the place of work.
Thanks for your beautiful comment that the intuition sampling method can be used but the researcher must employ reliability procedures to beef up the robustness of the research. Many thanks. Best regards
I think it depends on whether or not the intuition comes from knowledge of previous reliable studies. If the researcher knows that, for the type of study conducted, a sample size of 50 has a history of being reliable, then I see nothing wrong with intuition. But if the type of study is innovative or the researcher lacks knowledge about previous reliable sample sizes, then going with intuition is a bad idea.
Statistical analysis is one of the most used and misused weapon of information/misinformation not only today but in the history of mankind. It is said numbers do not lie but they do through statistics. Always it is a good thing to have wider space of samples, but the space from which sample collected is also dependent on what our project is (if it is to search for behaviors that depend on local or global parameters ). If a person wants to do research on his/her own institution based on data from there, then of course the sample should be there. But if the study is to get a broader understanding and comparison is involved, then data sample should be beyond the place of work.
I am grateful for your strong comparative analysis of the subject under discussion. Your arguments are very sound and offers great light to many of us. Thank you dearly. Best regards
Samples in qualitative research are usually small when compared to their quantitative size.It should be noted that the researcher in the qualitative study depends on his skill and research experience in the selection of samples, as the samples of small size may be more useful than large size in some studies, especially studies requiring observations or interviews of certain cases, as they provide Depth and better analysis of the surface analysis of larger samples.