More and more research centers operating in different countries and investigating climate change state that the progressing greenhouse effect on Earth is already a fact. As a result, the risk of increasingly frequent and increasingly dramatic climate disasters is increasing. Man has less and less time to counteract these negative processes.
It is necessary to change the development strategy based on intensifying the exploitation of the Earth's resources on the sustainable development strategy. It is necessary to develop new energy technologies based on renewable energy sources to slow down the progressing greenhouse effect of the Earth in order to reduce the risk of dramatic natural cataclysms. It is necessary to develop ecological innovations, while it may not be too late. It is necessary to save the Earth through destruction for future generations.
In view of the above, I am asking you to answer the following question: Is the greenhouse effect on Earth already objectively recognized by the climate research centers as an irreversible process?
I invite you to the discussion
We can say Yes and at the same time No. The most climate research centers have recognized the greenhouse effect on Earth, but as an irreversible process, I do not think so.
When we see a smoke coming from a forest; we say: there is a fire.
Did we see the fire? No only the smoke.... These are facts based on logic or previous experiences
The greenhouse effect has long been recognized by research centers and in the past, from the age of 60. Since the 1990s, many international researchers have come together under the auspices of the United Nations to work on this rapid and global climate change and its evolution. Regarding the cycle I totally agree with my colleague Kenneth M Towe
As far as I understand, if you are certain of the damage we have in our ecosystem, secondary to the greenhouse effect, here in Colombia the centers of Meteorologia, express their concern, when a natural disaster occurs, and the Community wonders What?
Is it possible that man with the help of modern RES energy technology would stop the greenhouse effect on Earth?
Unfortunately, more and more data and research centers scientifically confirms that progressively progressing global warming has become a fact. First and foremost, human activity influences this. The impact of natural factors is significant, however, the progress of civilization, industrial development, greenhouse gas emissions in the past few decades has increased significantly and continues to grow. The biggest problem may be the inability to reverse this process even if all of the industry, energy and transport are now switching to renewable energy sources.
In view of the above, the current question is: Is it possible that man with the help of modern RES energy technology would stop the greenhouse effect on Earth?
Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.
If it is no longer possible to reverse the global warming process, will we at least slow down the adverse climate change, the warming of the Earth's temperature, the progressive greenhouse effect on Earth? What actions should be taken now to make this possible in the 21st century? Please reply. I invite you to the discussion
" How plant-covered buildings improve urban life
A new report shows that greenery-lined structures combat both pollution and stress
By Barbara Eldredge@barbaraeldredge Sep 19, 2016,
"Living building facades do more than look good, they make the air good and they make urbanites feel good. At least, that’s the finding of a new report from global engineering firm Arup.
The company reported a series of studies exploring the impact of plant-covered building elements on air quality, acoustics, temperatures, energy use, and general quality of life.
Poor air quality is a growing concern for city-dwellers, where air pollution accounts for millions of premature deaths every year. Arup created a sophisticated computer model to calculate the flow of air through different types of cityscapes, examining how pollution might be impacted by green facades. Green façades can result in local reductions in concentrations of particulate matter, typically between 10 and 20%," wrote Martin Pauli, a senior architect at Arup. The study found that different plant species also created different affects, with pine and birch plants outperforming other species in combating air pollution during winter months (https://www.curbed.com/2016/9/19/12972332/green-sustainable-design-buildings-pollution-arup)".
The 2015 winning design for the Urban Habitat Award by Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat was the ParkRoyal on Pickering, a hotel in Singapore created by WOHA(https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/5-remarkable-buildings-that-use-trees-as-design-element)
Did you know, Professor, that this is a fact that is not only scientific, but also religious, for we Muslims, God said in the Holy Quran, Appeared corruption in the land and may have won the hands of people.
It should not be assumed that the global warming process has become irreversible. It does not have to be too late to develop ecological innovations, renewable energy sources, increase the efficiency of recyclables, reduce plastic production, etc. to implement the concept of pro-ecological sustainable zero development and the implementation of green economy. Perhaps it is not too late to attempt to implement environmentally sustainable development, we owe it to future generations, we owe it to our children and grandchildren. Such statements have repeatedly appeared during lectures and discussions during the UN Climate Summit, the so-called COP (Conference of the Parties), which was held in Katowice in December 2018.
I invite you to the discussion.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Atmospheric Sciences
- Climate Science
- Climate Change