To my mind, the EU citizenship is an experiment that takes place in order to detect and solve problems concerning this issue. The main challenge is the global legal unification. However, the EU experience can be useful in this case.

It is worth noting that global citizenship establishment will lead to the lawyers' redundance all over the world.

First we have to define the term ''global citizenship''.

EU citizenship does not exist in terms of having all rights and responsibilities of being a citizen of Europe. It only means that one person is a citizen of the member country and as such one can travel and have work permits and/or some other amenities (depends on a EU member and its own internal regulation) more easily then non EU member citizens.

So to answer the question of global citizenship it is prerequisite to define this term.

However, any EU citizen is entitled to vote in the EU parliament election that can be defined as a global citizenship precondition on the regional level.

Oleksandra Butko, The EU citizenship experiment is a valuable model for global citizenship, but the main challenge is global legal unification.

Tamara Stojcevic, Global citizenship is a complex concept with no single definition. However, it can be generally understood as the idea that individuals have certain rights and responsibilities as citizens of the world, regardless of their nationality.

Establishing a globally recognized status of "global citizenship" is a complex and challenging endeavor with significant legal, institutional, and practical hurdles to overcome. While it is theoretically possible, it faces numerous obstacles:

1 .National Sovereignty

2. International Law

3. Enforcement and Compliance

4.National Interests and Politics

5. Practical Implementation

6. Social and Cultural Diversity

7. Resource Allocation

8.Education and Awareness

9.Security and Terrorism

10.Economic and Trade Issues

and In practice, creating a globally recognized status of global citizenship would likely require a long-term, incremental approach with buy-in from a large majority of the world's nations. It would also require international institutions and organizations, like the United Nations, to play a central role in its development and implementation. Achieving this goal would likely take many years or even decades of diplomacy, negotiations, and cooperation on a global scale.

While the concept of global citizenship is idealistic and has been discussed in academic and philosophical circles, making it a legally recognized and practical reality remains a formidable challenge due to the various political, economic, and cultural obstacles.

Establisihing a globally recognized status of 'global citizenship' is a complex and multifaceted issue with significant legal, political, and practical challenges. Here are some critical hurdles that would need to be overcome in creating and implementing such a concept:

1. Legal Challenges:

a. Sovereignty: Nations guard their sovereignty fiercely. Granting global citizenship could be seen as undermining this principle. b. Legal Framework: There's currently no international legal framework for global citizenship. Creating one would require extensive negotiation and consensus among countries, each with their own legal systems. c. Rights and Responsibilities: Defining the rights and responsibilities of global citizens, especially in relation to national laws, could be contentious.

2. Political Challenges:

a. National Interests: Countries may prioritize their national interests over a global citizenship concept, fearing loss of control over their citizens. b. Political Will: Global cooperation requires political will from all nations, which can be difficult to achieve due to differing political ideologies and priorities. c. Identity and Culture: Many people identify strongly with their nationality and culture. Convincing societies to embrace a broader sense of identity would require extensive social and political efforts.

3. Institutional Challenges:

a. Implementation and Enforcement: Establishing institutions to manage global citizenship and ensuring compliance would be a massive undertaking. b. Bureaucracy: Creating a system to register, monitor, and support global citizens would demand substantial bureaucratic resources. c. Funding: Adequate funding for global citizenship initiatives would be crucial. Determining the sources and allocation of funds globally would be a major challenge.

4. Practical Challenges:

a. Education and Awareness: Raising awareness about global citizenship and its implications would be necessary to gain public support. b. Conflict Resolution: Disputes between global citizens and national governments would require efficient and fair conflict resolution mechanisms. c. Migration and Residency: Addressing issues related to migration, residency, and stateless individuals would be vital to the concept's success.

5. Cultural Challenges:

a. Diversity: Different cultures perceive citizenship differently. Bridging these diverse perspectives would be essential. b. Language: Language barriers could impede the understanding and acceptance of the concept across different regions.

In conclusion, while the idea of global citizenship is appealing in fostering a sense of shared humanity, the hurdles are immense. Overcoming these challenges would demand unprecedented international collaboration, diplomatic skill, and a shift in global consciousness towards a more inclusive worldview.

It is politically impossible to establish 'global citizenship'. Consequently, it is not legally possible, because the law is coupled back to 'facts' and possibilities - the law does not operate in a non-existent reality. Citizenship implies a specific legal (and de facto social) relationship with the state or the European Union and other citizens. The collective of citizens is a social group referred to as 'society'. Globally, neither of these necessary elements is present.

Dear Muhammad Hamza Zakir

I think we should refer to definitions (although not one and unanimous) of people capable of self-determination and self-government. In this context we usually refer to a group of people with a feeling of belonging together, on the basis of shared cultural practices and ideas, common history, common language, common economic life etc.

best regards,

Kamil.