Yes there are part of the same dimension. But it's not only ones, depends of the context and competence too. There are many variables and framework theory to explain the achievement. I suggest you the socio cultural perspective.
There is no doubt that human resources prepared and trained are the basis of the progress of different peoples and nations. If they have the right conditions and satisfy their psychological, physiological and social needs, their role in giving and producing will be the most effective. Satisfying the needs of the individual can guarantee his satisfaction with his work and thus lead to the improvement and development of his performance. This is what aspire countries that seek to advance the people and improve their way of life that the individual of all ages needs to achieve a reasonable degree of success and achievement and self-fulfillment in different areas of life.
"Is self recognition and self satisfaction part of need of achievement? You ask. You go on and ask if self recognition and self satisfaction are different variables or they come under the umbrella of need of achievement.
As I see it, self- recognition and self- satisfaction are different variables even though they come under the umbrella of need of achievement. Self-recognition is the case when the individual has, for example, a high sense of self-esteem and self-eficcacy. When this is the case, self-satisfaction or satisfaction with himself/herself tends to occur. Thus, self-recognition and self-satisfaction are deeply intertwined. When self-recognition is the case, one tends to see himself/herself as someone who feels good and happy with himself/herself.
Needlless to say, when self-recognition and self- satisfaction are the case, one's need of achievemnet or self-actualization in Maslow's sense is fulfilled.
I would be interested to hear answer if this question would be asked to Grigory Perelman. In my opinion, this is the only case when a person voluntarily does not want to be famous as the society wishes. Therefore, for him personally, his self-recognition is no more than his self-satisfaction. He did this only out of curiosity and nothing more than to prove to himself that he can do anything. Why? Because his act is the pinnacle of morality in science and it is difficult for us to understand it, although there are some explanations. Perelman firmly believed that mathematics was the world's most moral science and he was cruelly mistaken. It turned out that this is not the case. Therefore, he became frustrated and no longer wants anything from life, he generally retired. However, one must understand that his method of proof is much more important than his result, although this result was worth one million dollars.
Leticia Nayeli Ramírez-Ramírez Anastas Ivanov Ivanov Orlando M Lourenço Hazim Al Dilaimy thank you very much for the clear explanation of the terms. i am currently doing content analysis of my interviews. the participants have repetitively mentioned these terms (self-recognition and self-satisfaction ). i am having a hard time to create themes/sub themes for these two terms. as i am following McClelland's motivational theory. i wanted to have some expert's view whether they come under the umbrella of need of achievement or not.
The two constructs have their roots in neuroscience and are very essential to one's achievements in life because they are a prerequisite to self awareness and self reflection. Self recognition is the point of understanding the image of the self . On the other hand, self satisfaction is a state of the mind which one feels when a particular action results in positive consequences. Of course, self-satisfaction is something which relaxes the mind and sometimes may prevent us from further attempts in successfully finishing the task at hand. Therefore, one should always transcend the satisfaction level and try to achieve more. Stopping at the point of self satisfaction may rob one a chance to become the best.
And we must place both self-recognition and self-achievement, although they seem to be only psychological in nature, into the proper social and societal contexts: What does it mean to be self-aware in one society vs another? Is 'self-accomplishment' ever really totally-detached from the socially acceptable goals? Being a sociologist, I find that I have to keep reminding people that "individuality" is a societal product of Modern type societies. In pre-Modern societies, there is simply very little desire or need for separate persons ('individuals') to 'go and do their own thing'; doing so would be disruptive of the stability, predictability, and interdependence that allows the structure to work: If Jeb is a farmer with whom I, being a fisherman, trade, I don't suddenly want him to decide to become a musician- or I risk having my children starve.
Self-esteem: It is the positive and constructive assessment of the individual himself and his skills and the extent of his success and failure to achieve the goals set for himself and his achievements, that is, the individual's access to a high level of self-esteem and confidence.
Both are related to achievement of sorts. One can be satisfied with what one does without necessarily seeking a reward. However, it would be nice to be recognized, for example, by your university or organization for good work done. It is also possible that over time, a person does good work and is not recognized and someone who has done less significant work gets an award. Events like this may result in the person not just being content with self-satisfaction because the frustration is slowly building up.
Self satisfaction and self recognition are used as a synonyms with self actualization which occurs at the top of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. It means that it is the point of perfection for Human beings. So, both of them are related to human needs.